Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ? Cover

Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Volume 11 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. Bileišis, M. and P. Kovač. 2017. “Conclusion: Main Themes of Public Administration Reforms in the Eastern EU Member States.” In Bileišis, M., Kovač, P. (eds.). <em>Public Administration Reforms in Eastern European Union Member States: Post-Accession Convergence and Divergence</em>. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration / Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 471 – 494.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bouckaert, G., J. Nemec, V. Nakrošis, G. Hajnal and K. Tõnnisson. 2008. <em>Public Management Reform in Central and Eastern Europe</em>. Bratislava: NISPA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Chum, J. 2015. “Demytizace státní služby: Hledat nové symboly prestiže.” <em>Veřejná správa</em> 8, 15 – 17.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. EUROPEAID. 2015. <em>Evaluation of PHARE Financial Assistance to Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia</em>. Finale Report published on 19 January 2015. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/fi-nancial_assistance/phare/evaluation/2015/20150806-phare-ex-post-evaluation-final-report.pdf">https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/fi-nancial_assistance/phare/evaluation/2015/20150806-phare-ex-post-evaluation-final-report.pdf</ext-link> (last accessed 16 January 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Hendrych, D. et al. 1996. <em>Správní právo (Obecná část)</em>. Praha: C. H. BECK.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Hesse, J. J. 1998. “Rebuilding the State: Administrative Reform in Central and Eastern Europe.” In <em>Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space</em>. Sigma Paper 23, 168 – 179. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5kml6143zd8p-en.pdf?expires=1525927234&amp;id=id&amp;accname=guest&amp;checksum=8362DF08495FA0A1920E4C74C66C78EA">https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5kml6143zd8p-en.pdf?expires=1525927234&amp;id=id&amp;accname=guest&amp;checksum=8362DF08495FA0A1920E4C74C66C78EA</ext-link> (last accessed 16 January 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Korbel, F. et al. 2005. <em>Právo na informace (komentář)</em>. Praha: Linde.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Kuhlmann, S. and H. Wollmann. 2014. <em>Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe</em>. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Kužílek, O. and M. Žantovský. 2002. <em>Svoboda informací: Svobodný přístup k informacím v právním řádu České republiky</em>. Praha: Linde.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. 2009. “The Sustainability of Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after Accession.” SIGMA Paper 44. Paris: OECD Publications.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. MHW Consortium. 2007. <em>Phare Ex Post Evaluation. Phase 2, National and CBC Programmes: The Czech Republic</em>. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://aei.pitt.edu/93386/">http://aei.pitt.edu/93386/</ext-link> (last accessed 16 January 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016a. <em>Dopadová ex-post evaluace strategie realizace Smart administration v období 2007 – 2015 Efektivní veřejná správa a přátelské veřejné služby</em>. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.smartadministration.cz/docDetail.aspx?docid=22021463&amp;doctype=ART">http://www.smartadministration.cz/docDetail.aspx?docid=22021463&amp;doctype=ART</ext-link> (last accessed 4 October 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016b. <em>Analýza využívání metod kvality ve veřejné správě</em>. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/analyza-vyuzivani-metod-kvalityve-verejne-sprave-k-sc-1-3.aspx">http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/analyza-vyuzivani-metod-kvalityve-verejne-sprave-k-sc-1-3.aspx</ext-link> (last accessed 9 October 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016c. <em>Analýza měření a hodnocení výkonu veřejné správy v ČR</em>. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/4-analyza-sc-1-4-hodnoceni-amereni-vykonu-vs-v-cr-f-pdf.aspx">http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/4-analyza-sc-1-4-hodnoceni-amereni-vykonu-vs-v-cr-f-pdf.aspx</ext-link> (last accessed 9 October 2017).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Ministerstvo vnitra. 2017. <em>Systém měření a hodnocení veřejné správy</em>. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/mereni-a-hodnoceni-verejne-spravy.aspx">http://www.mvcr.cz/soubor/mereni-a-hodnoceni-verejne-spravy.aspx</ext-link> (last accessed 9 January 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Národni Vzdělávací Fond. 1998. <em>Analýza veřejné správy České republiky (Souhrnná zpráva)</em>. Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.nvf.cz/archiv/versprava/analyza/obsah.htm">http://www.nvf.cz/archiv/versprava/analyza/obsah.htm</ext-link> (last accessed 10 May 2010).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Nemec, J. 2008. “Public Management Reforms in CEE: Lessons Learned.” In Bouckaert, G., Nemec, J. Nakrosis, V., Hajnal, G., Tonnisson, K. (eds.). <em>Public Management Reform in Central and Eastern Europe</em>. Bratislava: NISPA, 343 – 371.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Nemec, J., G. Bouckaert and V. Nakrosis. 2011. “Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results.” <em>The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy</em> 4(1), 9 – 32.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Ochrana, F., M. J. Půček and D. Špaček. 2015. <em>Veřejná správa</em>. Brno: Ekonomickosprávní fakulta.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. OECD. 2001. <em>Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making</em>. Paris, OECD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. OECD. 2009. <em>Government at a Glance</em>. Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Pokorná, K. 2016. <em>Dopady zavedení služebního zákona na konkrétní úřad</em>. Master Thesis tutored by D. Špaček. Brno: Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University. Reprinted in <em>Veřejná správa</em> 25 – 26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Špaček, D. 2010. “Promotion of Quality Management in Public Administration: The Approach of Czech Central Government.” <em>Národohospodářský obzor</em> 4, 133 – 150.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/v10135-011-0002-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/v10135-011-0002-2</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Špaček, D. 2014. “Coordination of and through E-Government: The Case of the Czech Republic.” <em>The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy</em> 7(1), 83 – 106.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2014-0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/nispa-2014-0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Špaček, D. 2015a. “E-government Policy and its Implementation in the Czech Republic: Selected Shortcomings.” <em>Central European Journal of Public Policy</em> 9(1), 78 – 100.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0004" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/cejpp-2016-0004</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Špaček, D. 2015b. “Quality Management in the Czech Public Administration.” In J. Nemec and M. S. de Vries (eds). <em>Implementation of New Public Management Tools: Experiences from Transition and Emerging Countries</em>. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 285 – 304.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Špaček, D. 2016. “e-Government Benchmarking: Score vs. Reality (The Case of EU e-gov Benchmarking and Czech e-Government).” Draft paper prepared for the NISPAcee 2016 conference, 19 – 21 May 2016, Zagreb, Croatia.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Špaček, D. 2018. <em>Role and Effect of External Support to Public Administration in the Czech Republic, 2018</em>. Task 3 report prepared for the EUPACK project a finalized in February 2018, not published.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Špaček, D. and J. Nemec. 2017a. <em>Public Administration Characteristics in Czech Republic</em>. Prepared for the EUPACK project and finalized in October 2017, not published.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Špaček, D. and J. Nemec. 2017b. Report on Public Administration Reform Trends and Reform Dynamics in the Czech Republic. Prepared for the EUPACK project and finalized in October 2017, not published.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Špaček, D. and J. Neshybová. 2010. “Brief History and Current Trends of Public Administration Reform in the Czech Republic.” In <em>Public Administration in Times of Crisis</em>. Bratislava: NISPAcee. CD Rom (conference proceedings).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Špaček, D. 2017, Social media usage and performance: the case of Czech regions. In Innovation Governance in the Public Sector. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Tinholt, D. et al. 2017. <em>eGovernment Benchmark 2017: Taking Stock of User-Centric Design and Delivery of Digital Public Services in Europe.</em> Available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/11/2017-egovernment-benchmark-insight1.pdf">https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/11/2017-egovernment-benchmark-insight1.pdf</ext-link> (last accessed 16 February 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Verheijen, T. 1998. “Chapter 1: The Management of EU Affairs in Candidate Member States: Inventory of the Current State of Affairs.” <em>SIGMA Paper</em> 23, 16 – 40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Vidláková, O. 2000. <em>Reformy veřejné správy</em>. Pardubice: Univerzita Pardubice. de Vries, M. 2017. “Public Administration Reforms in the EEU – Introduction.” In P. Kovač and M. Bileišis (eds). <em>Public Administration Reforms in Eastern European Union Member States: Post-Accession Convergence and Divergence</em>. Ljubljana: Univesity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration / Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 26 – 33.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.0008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.24193/tras.2017.0008</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Zikmunda, M. 2010. <em>Očekávané a reálné přínosy implementace řízení kvality ve veřejné správě</em>. Diploma thesis. Brno: Masaryk University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 155 - 182
Published on: Jul 17, 2018
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
public administration reform,
Czechia,
civil service,
e-government,
quality management
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Political science,
Local government and administration

© 2018 David Špaček, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 11 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)Next article