Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Government Capacity and Capacity-Building in Hungary: A New Model in the Making ? Cover

Government Capacity and Capacity-Building in Hungary: A New Model in the Making ?

Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. Addison, H. J. 2009. “Is Administrative Capacity a Useful Concept ? Review of the Application, Meaning and Observation of Administrative Capacity in Political Science Literature.” LSE research paper. Available at http://personal.lse.ac.uk/addisonh/Papers/AC_Concept.pdf (last accessed 15 February 2018).
  2. Ágh, A. 2016. “The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the Worst-Case Scenario.” Problems of Post-Communism 63(5 – 6), 277 – 287.10.1080/10758216.2015.1113383
  3. Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2015. Policy Performance and Governance Capacities in the OECD and EU Sustainable Governance Indicators 2015. Bertelsmann Stiftung. Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/policy-performance-and-governance-capacities-in-the-oecd-and-eu/ (last accessed 28 May 2018).
  4. Bíró, M. 2014. Personal Interview (conducted 8 May 2014).
  5. European Commission (2001): White paper on European governance. COM 428 Final, Brussels: Commission of the EU. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/european-governance-white-paper_en (last accessed 28 May 2018).
  6. Csillag, T. and I. Szelényi. 2015. “Drifting from Liberal Democracy.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 1(1), 18 – 48.
  7. Dahlström, C., J. Teorell, S. Dahlberg, F. Hartmann, A. Lindberg and M. Nistotskaya. 2015. The QoG Expert Survey Dataset II. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, The Quality of Government Institute. Available at https://qog.pol.gu.se/data/datadownloads/qogexpertsurveydata (last accessed 28 February 2018).
  8. European Commission. 2010. A Digital Agenda for Europe. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2010) 245 final / 2. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0245R(01)&from=EN (last accessed 28 May 2018).
  9. European Commission. 2012. Excellence in Public Administration for Competitiveness in EU Member States. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/excellence-public-administration-competitivenesseu-member-states-0_en. (last accessed 28 May 2018).
  10. European Commission. 2014. Monitoring and Evaluation of European Cohesion Policy European Social Fund Guidance: Document on Indicators of Public Administration Capacity Building. Brussels: European Commission. Available at ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=14144&langId=en (last accessed 20 February 2018).
  11. European Commission. 2016. European Commission Digital Economy and Society Index Online Database. Available at https://digital-agenda-data.eu/charts/desi-components#chart={“indicator”:“DESI”,“breakdown-group”:“DESI”,“unitmeasure”:“pc_DESI”,“time-period”:“2016”} (last accessed 28 February 2018).
  12. Fukuyama, F. 2004. “The Imperative of State-Building.” Journal of Democracy 15(2);17 – 31.10.1353/jod.2004.0026
  13. Gallup World Poll. 2015. Gallup Perception of Corruption. Available at http://news.gallup.com/poll/185759/widespread-government-corruption.aspx (last accessed DATE).
  14. Goggin, M., A. Bowman, J. Leste and L. O’Toole, Jr. 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. New York: Harper Collins.
  15. Greskovits, B. 2015. “The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe.” Glob Policy 6, 28 – 37.10.1111/1758-5899.12225
  16. Hajnal, G. 2015. “Illiberalism in the Making: Orbán-Era Governance Reforms in the View of the Administrative Elite.” In P. Kovac and G. Gajduschek (eds). Contemporary Governance Models and Practices in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 133 – 156.
  17. Hajnal, G. 2016. “Illiberal or Simply Unorthodox ? Public Administration Education in Hungary and Europe: A Comparative Perspective.” Teaching Public Administration 34(2), 206 – 225.10.1177/0144739415621784
  18. Hajnal, G. 2018. Role and Effect of External Support to Public Administration in Hungary. EUPACK Technical Report (manuscript).
  19. Hajnal, G. and S. Csengődi. 2014. “When Crisis Hits Superman: Change and Stability of Political Control and Politicization in Hungary.” Administrative Culture 15(1), 39 – 57.
  20. Hajnal, G. and É. Kovács. 2017. “Hungary’s Central State Administration 1990 – 2014.” In J. Nemec and D. Špaček (eds). 25 Years of Public Administration Developments and Reforms in V4 Region. Brno: Masaryk University, 48 – 84.
  21. Hajnal, G. and M. Rosta. 2016. “A New Doctrine in the Making ? Doctrinal Foundations of Sub-National Governance Reforms in Hungary 2010 – 2014.” In Administration and Society.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399715626202.10.1177/0095399715626202
  22. Hajnal, G. and M. Rosta. 2017. “Hungary: Undoing New Public Management or Building upon It ? The Hungarian Local Governmental Application Service Provider Centre Project as a Case of Joined-Up Government Initiatives.” In H. Bjorna, S. Leixnering and T. Polzer (eds). “Joined-up” Local Governments ? Restructuring and Reorganising Internal Management. Vienna: Facultas, 99 – 126.
  23. Halligan, J. 2010. “Post-NPM Responses to Disaggregation through Coordinating Horizontally and Integrating Governance.” In P. Laegreid and K. Verhoest (eds). Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Autonomy, Control and Performance. Houndmills / New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 235 – 254.10.1057/9780230290600_12
  24. Hilderbrand, M. E. and M. S. Grindle. 1997. Building Sustainable Capacity in the Public Sector: What Can Be Done ? Getting Good Governance Capacity Building in the Public Sector of Developing Countries. Harvard, MA: Harvard Institute of International Development.
  25. Korkut, U. 2012. Liberalization Challenges in Hungary: Elitism, Progressivism, and Populism. Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137075673
  26. Kornai, J. 2015. “Hungary’s U-Turn.” Society and Economy 37(3), 279 – 329.10.1556/204.2015.37.3.1
  27. Lampert, M. 2014. Personal Interview (conducted 8 May 2014).
  28. Müller, György. 2010. “A kormányzati viszonyok változásai 2010-ben” [Changes in Governmental Relationships]. Közjogi Szemle [Public Law Digest] (3), 10–17.
  29. Nacsa, B. 2014. “The Institutional Environment of the Public Sector Labor Market.” In K. Fazekas and L. Neumann (eds). The Hungarian labour market. Budapest: Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the National Employment Non-profit Public Company, Ltd, pp. 114–123
  30. OECD. 2008. Structural Reform and Capacity Building: Proceedings of the Eighth APEC-OECD Workshop on Regulatory Reform, Gyeongju, Korea, September 2005, APEC-OECD Co-operative Initiative on Regulatory Reform, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264051645-en.10.1787/9789264051645-en
  31. OECD. 2017. Government at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  32. Sárközy, T. 2007. “A kormányzás modernizálásáról” [On the Government’s Modernisation]. Mozgó Világ Online [Moving World Online] 32(8). Available at http://mozgovilag.com/?p=2447 (last accessed 11 March 2014).
  33. Sárközy, T. 2007. “Egy év után: A kormányzás átalakításának tapasztalatairól” [One Year On: Experiences of the Government’s Reformation]. Mozgó Világ Online [Moving World Online] 33(6). Available at http://mozgovilag.com/?p=2469 (last accessed 12 November 2012).
  34. Staronová, K. and G. Gajduschek. 2013. “Civil Service Reform in Slovakia and Hungary: The Road to Professionalisation ?” In C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker and L. Verhey (ed.). Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance. Houndmills in Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 123 – 151.10.1057/9781137316813_8
  35. Szente, Z. 1999. “Közigazgatás és politika metszéspontján: a miniszterek és az államtitkárok rekrutációja Magyarországon, 1990 – 1998” [At the crossroads of public administration and politics: The recruitment of ministers and state secretaries in Hungary 1990 – 1998]. Századvég 13 (Summer), 3 – 51.
  36. Thijs N., In., In. G. Hammerschmid and E. Palaric. 2017. A Comparative Overview of Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8072 (last accessed 16 / 05 / 2018).
  37. UN. 1992. Chapter 37: “National Mechanisms and International Cooperation for Capacity-Building in Developing Countries.” United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Available at http://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/a21-capacity-building.html (last accessed 16 / 05 / 2018).
  38. UN. 2006. Definition of Basic Concepts and Terminologies in Governance and Public Administration. Place: United Nations Committee of Experts on Public Administration. World Bank. 2015. Worldwide Governance Indicator. Available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#doc-sources (last accessed 06 / 05 / 2018).
  39. Yin, Robert K. 2012. Applications of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  40. Ministry of Public Administration and Justice (2012): Magyary Zoltá n Public Administration Development Programme (MP 12.0). Available at: https://magyaryprogram.kormany.hu/admin/download/a/15/50000/Magyary_kozig_fejlesztesi_program_2012_A4_eng_%283%29.pdf (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  41. Civitas Institution Economic and Social Science Research Co. and Transparency International Hungary Foundation (2018): Black Book Corruption in Hungary between 2010 and 2018. Civitas Institution, Budapest, 2018. Available at: https://transparency.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Black-Book.pdf (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  42. World Bank (2017): Ease of Doing Business. Doing Business project. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.BUS.EASE.XQ (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  43. European Commissione (2017): European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. Available at: https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2017/06/European_Innovation_Scoreboard_2017.pdf (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  44. Directorate-General for Communication (2016): Flash Eurobarometer 417: European businesses and public administration. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/data/dataset/S2089_417_ENG (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  45. United Nations (2016): UN E-Government Survey 2016. New York: United Nations. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/reports/un-e-government-survey-2016 (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  46. Halligan, J. (2008): The Impact of Horizontal Coordination in Australia. Paper for the European Consortium on Political Research Regulation & Governance conference Utrecht University, June 5 – 7 2008. Available at: https://soc.kuleuven.be/io/cost/.../Halligan_Horizontal%20Coordination%20Paper.doc (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  47. Corruption Research Center Budapest (2015): Impact Assessments Public Consultation and Legislation in Hungary 2011 – 2014. Available at: http://www.crcb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/legislation_2014_report_150630.pdf (last accessed: 06 / 07 / 2018).
  48. Hajnal, Gy. (2010): Agencies in Hungary: Uses and misuses of a concepts, In: Laegreid, Per and Koen Verhoest (2010) (ed.): Governance of public sector organizations. Autonomy, control and performance, Houndmills / New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  49. Hajnal, Gy. (2011): Agencies and the politics of agencification in Hungary, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 2011 (Special Issue) pp. 74 – 92.
  50. Hajnal, Gy. (2008): Public management reforms: Hungary, In: Bouckaert, Geert, Juraj Nemec, Vitalis Nakrosis, György Hajnal and Kristiina Tönnisson (2008) (ed.): Public management reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Bratislava: NISPAcee pp. 121 – 150.
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 39
Published on: Jul 17, 2018
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 György Hajnal, Krisztián Kádár, Éva Kovács, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.