References
- Hajnal, Gyorgy. 2003. “Diversity and Convergence: A Quantitative Analysis of European Public Administration Education Programs.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 9, 245 - 258.
- Morstein Marx, Fritz. 1967. “German Administration and Th e Speyer Academy.” Public Administration Review 27, 403 - 410.
- Pollitt, Christopher. 1996. “Antistatist Reforms and New Administrative Directions: Public Administration in the United Kingdom.” Public Administration Review 56, 81 - 87.
- Posner, P. L. (2009). Th e Pracademic: An Agenda for Re-Engaging Practitioners and Academics, in: Public Budgeting & Finance, Vol. 29 / 1 pp12 - 26.
- Raadschelders, Jos C. N. 2011. “Th e Study of Public Adminsitration in the United States.” Public Administration 89, 140 - 155.
- Reichard, Christoph. 2010. “Challenges of Public Administration Accreditation.” Uprava 7 / 1 - 2, 37 - 51.
- Rhodes, R. A. W. 1991. “Th eory and Methods in British Public Administration: Th e View from Political Science.” Political Studies 39, 533 - 554.
- Robson, W. A. 1975. “Th e Study of Public Administration then and now.” Political Studies 23, 193 - 201.
- Stillman, J. Richard. 1997. “American vs. European Public Administration: Does Public Administration Make the Modern State, or Does the State Make Public Administration ?” Public Administration Review 57, 332 - 338.
- Task Force on Standards of Excellence for Public Administration Education and Training. 2008. Standards of Excellence for Public Administration Education and Training. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs / International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration. Available at http://www.iias-iisa.org/iasia/e/Pages/default.aspx (last accessed 19-09-2013.
- Waldo, Dwight. 1948. Th e Administrative State: A Study of the Political Th eory of American Public Administration. New York: Ronald Press.
- Wengert, E. S. 1942. “Public Administration: Th e Study of Public Administration.” Th e American Political Science Review 36, 313 - 322.