References
- Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E., McDougall, R., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2019). The GTAP data base: Version 10. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4(1), 1-27. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.040101AF
- Altig, D., Auerbach, A.J., Kotlikoff, L.J., Smetters, K.A., & Walliser, J. (2001). Simulating fundamental tax reform in the United Sates. American Economic Review, 91(3), 574–595. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.3.57410.1257/aer.91.3.574
- Ballard, C.L., Shoven, J.B., & Whalley, J. (1985). General equilibrium computations of the marginal welfare costs of taxes in the United States. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 128–138.
- Boyd, R. (1988). An economic model of direct and indirect effects of tax reform on agriculture (Technical Bulletin No. 1743). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
- Browing, E. K., & Johnson, W. R. (1984). The trade-off between equality and efficiency. Journal of Political Economy, 92, 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1086/26121910.1086/261219
- Burfisher, M. (2016) Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/978131645074110.1017/9781316450741
- Carbone, J. C. and Smith K. V. (2008) Evaluating policy interventions with general equilibrium externalities. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1254-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.06.00310.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.06.003
- Cordano, A. L. V. and Balistreri, E. J. (2003) The marginal cost of public funds of mineral and energy taxes in Peru. Resources Policy, 35(4), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.08.00210.1016/j.resourpol.2010.08.002
- Cutler, H. Shields, M. and Davies, S. (2018) Can State Tax Policy Increase Economic Activity and Reduce Inequality? Growth and Change, 49(1), 142-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.1221610.1111/grow.12216
- Figari, F., Gandullia, L. and Lezzi, E. (2018) Marginal Cost of Public Funds: From the Theory to the Empirical Application for the Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Tax-Benefit Systems. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 18(4), 1682-1935. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-013210.1515/bejeap-2018-0132
- Fullerton, D., Shoven, B. J. and Whalley, J. (1983) Replacing the U.S. Income Tax with a Progressive Consumption Tax. Journal of Public Economics, 20, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(83)90018-X10.1016/0047-2727(83)90018-X
- Hanson, G., and Bertelsen. D. (1987) Tax Reform Impacts on Agricultural Production and Investment Decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.2307/124225110.2307/1242251
- Hansson, I. and Stuart, Ch. (1983) Taxation, Government Spending, and Labor Supply: A Diagrammatic Exposition. Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, 21, 584-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1983.tb00656.x10.1111/j.1465-7295.1983.tb00656.x
- Hertel, T.W. and Tsigas, M.E. (1997) Structure of GTAP. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applicaations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174688.00310.1017/CBO9781139174688.003
- Hertel, T.W., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2016). Chapter 14: Behavioral parameters (Center for Global Trade Analysis). In Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
- Horvath, M., Senaj, M., Siebertova, Z., Švarda, N., & Valachyová, J. (2019) The end of the flat tax experiment in Slovakia: An evaluation using behavioural microsimulation in a dynamic macroeconomic framework. Economic Modelling, 80, 171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.005.10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.005
- Huff, K., & Hertel, T.W. (2001). Welfare changes in the GTAP model (GTAP Technical Paper No. 5). West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
- McDougall, Robert (2001) A new regional household demand system for GTAP (GTAP Technical Paper No. 20). West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
- Nadoveza, O., Sekur, T., & Beg, M. (2016). General equilibrium effects of lower labor tax burden in Croatia. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 19, 1-14. doi: 10.1515/zireb-2016-0009.10.1515/zireb-2016-0009
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Reshaping the personal income tax in Slovenia. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/reshaping-the-personal-income-tax-in-Slovenia.pdf
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Tax policy reforms 2019: OECD and selected partner economies. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/da56c295-en.10.1787/da56c295-en
- Páleník, V., & Miklošovič, T. (2016). CGE modelling of macroeconomic effects of environmental taxes as an EU own resource – Case of Slovakia (Working Papers 88). Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences.
- Parry, I. W. H. (2003). On the costs of excise taxes and income taxes in the UK. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102383961466810.1023/A:1023839614668
- Remeta, J., Perret S., Jareš, M., & Brys. B. (2015). Moving beyond the flat tax – Tax policy reform in the Slovak Republic (OECD Taxation Working Papers 22). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Stuart, C. (1984) Welfare costs per dollar of additional tax revenue in the United States. American Economic Review, 74, 352–62.
- Tran, C., & Wende, S. (2017) On the Marginal Excess Burden of Taxation in an Overlapping Generations Model. ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2017-652. Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.305095310.2139/ssrn.3050953
- Urban, I., Čok, M.,& Verbič, M. (2019) The burden of labour taxation in Croatia, Slovenia and Slovakia in the period 2011–2017, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1430-1456, DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1638291 https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.163829110.1080/1331677X.2019.1638291https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1638291