Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Asset Management of Existing Concrete Bridges Using Digital Twins and BIM: a State-of-the-Art Literature Review Cover

Asset Management of Existing Concrete Bridges Using Digital Twins and BIM: a State-of-the-Art Literature Review

Nordic Concrete Research
Volume 66 (2022): Issue 1 (July 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. 1. Woodward R, Cullington D W, Daly A F, Vassie P R, Haardt P, Kashner R, Astudillo R, Velando C, Godart B & Cremona C: “Bridge management in Europe (BRIME) -Deliverable D14”. Final Report, 2001.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Hurt M & Schrock S: “Highway Bridge Maintenance Planning and Scheduling”. Chapter 1, “Introduction”, 2016, pp. 1–30.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802069-2.00001-5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/B978-0-12-802069-2.00001-5</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Khan M A: “Accelerated Bridge Construction”, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, USA, 2015, pp. 53–102.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00002-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00002-2</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Powers N, Frangopol D M, Al-Mahaidi R & Caprani C: “Maintenance, safety, risk, management and life-cycle performance of bridges”, CRC Press, London, UK, 2018, p. 219–225.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315189390" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1201/9781315189390</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Darbani B M & Hammad A: “Critical review of new directions in bridge management systems”. Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007, pp. 330–337.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/40937(261)41" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/40937(261)41</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Boje C, Guerriero A, Kubicki S & Rezgui Y: “Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 114, No. 103179, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Grieves M & Vickers J: “Digital Twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems”, Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 85–113.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Cimino C, Negri E & Fumagalli L: “Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing”. Computers in Industry, Vol. 113, No. 103130, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Lu Q, Parlikad A K, Woodall P, Don Ranasinghe G, Xie X, Liang Z, Konstantinou E, Heaton J & Schooling J: “Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus”. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 05020004, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. ELSEVIER: “Scopus”, ELSEVIER, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/. [Accessed 2021].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Morgenthal G, Hallermann N, Kersten J, Taraben J, Debus P, Helmrich M & Rodehorst V: “Framework for automated UAS-based structural condition assessment of bridges”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 97, pp. 77–95, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.006</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Omer M, Margetts L, Hadi Mosleh M, Hewitt S & Parwaiz M: “Use of gaming technology to bring bridge inspection to the office”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1292–1307.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1615962" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15732479.2019.1615962</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Isailovic D, Stojanovic V, Trapp M, Richter R, Hajdin R & Döllner J: “Bridge damage: Detection, IFC-based semantic enrichment and visualization”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 112, No. 103088, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103088" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103088</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Popescu C, Täljsten B, Blanksvärd T & Elfgren L: “3D reconstruction of existing concrete bridges using optical methods”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2019, pp. 912-924.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1594315" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15732479.2019.1594315</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Delgado J M D, Butler L J, Gibbons N, Brilakis I, Elshafie M Z E B & Middleton C: “Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM”. Bridge Engineering, Vol. 170, 2017, pp. 204-218.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.16.00013" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1680/jbren.16.00013</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Butler L J, Elshafie M Z E B & Middleton C R: “Pervasive Fibre-optic sensor networks in bridges: a UK case study”. Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS, Melbourne, Australia, 2018, pp.1738-1745.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315189390-237" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1201/9781315189390-237</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Xu Y & Turkan I: “BrIM and UAS for bridge inspections and management”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2019, pp. 785-807.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0556" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0556</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Donato V, Biagini C, Bertini G & Marsugli F: “Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of H-BIM with regards to historical infrastructures: a case study of the Ponte Giorgini in Castiglione della Pescaia (Grosseto - Italy)”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-5/W1, 2017, pp.253-260.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-253-2017" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-253-2017</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Riveiro B, Jauregui D V, Arias P, Armesto J & Jiang R: “An innovative method for remote measurement of minimum vertical underclearance in routine bridge inspection”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 25, 2012, pp. 34–40.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.008</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Sacks R, Kedar A, Borrmann A, Ma L, Brilakis I, Hüthwohl P, Daum S, Kattel U, Yosef R, Liebich I, Barutcu B E & Muhic S: “SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: Overview, information delivery manual and model view definition”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 90, 2018, pp. 134–145.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.033" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.033</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Banfi F, Barazzetti L, Previtali M & Roncoroni F: “Historic BIM: a new repository for structural health monitoring”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-5/W1, 2017.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-269-2017" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-269-2017</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Cha G, Park S & Oh T: “A Terrestrial LiDAR-Based Detection of Shape Deformation for Maintenance of Bridge Structures”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 145(12), No. 04019075, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001701</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Barazzetti L, Banfi F, Brumana R, Previtali M & Roncoroni F: “BIM from laser scans... not just for buildings: NURBS-based parametric modeling of a medieval bridge”. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. III-5, 2016, pp. 51-56.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-III-5-51-2016" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5194/isprsannals-III-5-51-2016</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. McKenna T, Minehane M, O’Keeffe B, O’Sullivan G & Ruane K: “Bridge information modelling (BrIM) for a listed viaduct”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering, Vol. 170, 2017, pp.1-12.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.16.00007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1680/jbren.16.00007</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. León-Robles C A, Reinoso-Gordo J F & González-Quiñones J J: “Heritage building information modeling (H-BIM) applied to a stone bridge”. International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 8, No. 121, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8030121" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/ijgi8030121</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Borin P & Cavazzini F: “Condition assessment of RC bridges. Integrating machine learning, photogrammetry and BIM”, ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp.201-208.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-201-2019" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-201-2019</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Stavroulaki M E, Riveiro B, Drosopoulos G A, Solla M, Koutsianitis P & Stavroulakis G E: “Modelling and strength evaluation of masonry bridges using terrestrial photogrammetry and finite elements”. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 101, 2016, pp. 136-148.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.007</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Abu Dabous S, Yaghi S, Alkass S & Moselhi O: “Concrete bridge deck condition assessment using IR Thermography and Ground Penetrating Radar technologies”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 81, 2017, pp. 340-354.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.006</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Alani A M, Aboutalebi M & Kilic G: “Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges”. NDT&E International, Vol. 61, 2014, pp. 80-94.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.001</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. Conde B, Ramos L F, Oliveira D V, Riveiro B & Solla M: “Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and threedimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge”. Engineering Structures, Vol. 148, 2017, pp. 621-638.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. Mathworks: “MATLAB”. MathWorks, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html. [Accessed 2021].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. McGuire B, Atadero R, Clevenger C & Ozbek M: “Bridge information modeling for inspection and evaluation”. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21(4), No. 04015076, 2016.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000850" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000850</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. Microsoft: “Excel”, Microsoft, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/svse/microsoft-365/excel. [Accessed 2021].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. Huthwohl P, Brilakis I, Borrmann A & Sacks R: “Integrating RC bridge defect information into BIM models”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32(3), No. 04018013, 2018, pp. 1–14.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000744" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000744</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. Jeonga S, Hou R, Lynch J P, Sohn H & Law K H: “An information modeling framework for bridge monitoring”. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 114, 2017, pp. 11-31.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.009</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. AUTODESK: “Revit”, AUTODESK, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.autodesk.com/products/revit/overview. [Accessed 2021].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Boddupalli C, Sadhu A, Rezazadeh Azar E & Pattyson S: “Improved visualization of infrastructure monitoring data using Building Information Modeling”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1247-1263.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1602150" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15732479.2019.1602150</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 38. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J & Sihn W: “Digital Twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification”. IFAC PapersOnLine, Vol. 51, No. 11, 2018, pp. 1016-1022.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 39. Negri E, Fumagalli L & Macchi M: “A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based production systems”. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 11, 2017, pp. 939-948.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 40. Sacks R, Brilakis I, Pikas E, Xie H & Girolami M: “Construction with digital twin information systems”. Data-Centric Engineering, Vol. 1, No. E14, 2020.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2020.16" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/dce.2020.16</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. 41. Khajavi S H, Motlagh N H, Jaribion A, Werner L C & Holmstrom J: “Digital Twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings”. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 147406-147419.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. 42. Shim C S, Dang N S, Lon S & Jeon C H: “Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1319-1332.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. 43. Lu R & Brilakis I: “Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 105, No. 102837, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. 44. Ye C, Butler L, Calka B, Iangurazov M, Lu Q, Gregory A, Girolami M & Middleton C: “A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring”, Proceedings, 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring - IWSHM, Stanford, USA, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.12783/shm2019/32287" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.12783/shm2019/32287</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. 45. FHWA: “Bridge Preservation and Maintenance in Europe and South Africa”, Washington D.C., USA, 2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. 46. Mirzaei Z, Adey B T, Klatter L & Thompson P: “The IABMAS Bridge Management Committee Overview of Existing Bridge Management Systems”, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. 47. Helmerich R, Niederleithinger E, Algernon D, Streicher D & Wiggenhauser H: “Bridge inspection and condition assessment in Europe”. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2044, 2008, pp. 31–38.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3141/2044-04" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3141/2044-04</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. 48. Thompson P D, Small E P, Johnson M & Marshall A R: “The Pontis Bridge Management System”. Structural Engineering International, Vol. 8(4), 1998, pp. 303–308.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488758" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2749/101686698780488758</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. 49. Gholami M, Sam A R M & Jamaludin M Y: “Assessment of Bridge Management System in Iran”. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 573-583.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.052" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.052</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. 50. Mendonça T, Brito V & Milhazes F: “Aplicação de gestão de obras de arte - GOA - nova geração” (Bridge management application – GOA – new generation). BETAR Consultores Ltda., Lisbon, 2010 (in Portuguese).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. 51. Mocoso Y F M: “Modelos de Degradação para Aplicação em Sistemas de Obras de Arte Especiais – OAEs” (Degradation models for bridge application systems) (PhD Thesis), University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2017 (in Portuguese).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. 52. Liao H K & Yau N J: “Development of Various Bridge Condition Indices for Taiwan Bridge Management System”, Proceedings, 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Seoul, Korea, 2011, pp.911-916.<a href="https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2011/0168" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.22260/ISARC2011/0168</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. 53. Safi M, Sundquist H, Karoumi R & Racutanu G: “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by upgrading and expanding the use of LCC”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 9(12), 2013, pp. 1240-1250.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.682588" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15732479.2012.682588</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. 54. Mirzaei Z, Adey B T, Klatter L & Thompson P: “The IABMAS bridge management committee overview of existing bridge management systems”, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. 55. Chan B, Guan H, Hou L, Jo J, Blumenstein M & Wang J: “Defining a conceptual framework for the integration of modelling and advanced imaging for improving the reliability and efficiency of bridge assessments”. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 6, 2016, pp. 703-714.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0191-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s13349-016-0191-6</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. 56. Hendy C, Brock C & Nicholls T: “Management of the M4 Elevated Section substructures”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering, No. 1600006, 2017.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.16.00006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1680/jbren.16.00006</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. 57. Previtali M, Barazzetti L, Banfi F & Roncoroni F: “Informative content models for infrastructure load testing management: The Azzone Visconti bridge in Lecco”. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-2/W11, 2019, pp. 995-1001.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-995-2019" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-995-2019</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. 58. Tao F, Zhang M, Liu Y & Nee A Y C: “Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment”. CIRP Annals, Vol. 67, 2018, pp. 169-172.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. 59. Brilakis I & Ariyachandra M: “Application of Railway Topology for the Automated Generation of Geometric Digital Twins of Railway Masts”. ECPPM 2021 – eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 2021, pp. 373-380.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003191476-52" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1201/9781003191476-52</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. 60. Dibernardo S: “Integrated modelling systems for bridge asset management - case study”, Structures Congress, Reston, USA, 2012, pp. 483-493.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412367.043" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/9780784412367.043</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. 61. Brady K C, O’Reilly M, Bevc L, Znidaric A, O’Brien E & Jordan R: “Cost 345 - Procedures required for the assessment of highway structures - Final report”. European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. 62. Zhao Z, Gao Y, Hu X, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Qin G, Guo J, Liu Y, Yu C & Han D: “Integrating BIM and IoT for smart bridge management”, Proceedings, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 371, No. 022034, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/371/2/022034" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1088/1755-1315/371/2/022034</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. 63. Zhu J, Tan Y, Wang X & Wu P: “BIM/GIS integration for web GIS-based bridge management”. Annals of GIS, Vol. 27(1), 2020, pp. 99-109.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1743355" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/19475683.2020.1743355</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. 64. Marzouk M M & Hisham M: “Bridge information modelling in sustainable bridge management”. Proceedings, International Conference on Sustainable Design and Construction - ICSDC, Kansas City, USA, 2011, pp. 457-466.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. 65. Wan C, Zhou Z, Li S, Ding Y, Xu Z, Yang Z, Xia Y & Yin F: “Development of a bridge management system based on the building information modelling technology”. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 4583, 2019.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174583" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/su11174583</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. 66. Hallberg D & Racutanu G: “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by introducing a LMS concept”. Materials and Structures, Vol. 40, 2007, pp. 627-639.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9175-z" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1617/s11527-006-9175-z</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. 67. Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R, Glaessgen E, Kemp C, LeMoigne J & Wang L: “DRAFT Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Roadmap”, Technology Area 11, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2021-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2545-2819 | Journal ISSN: 0800-6377
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 111
Submitted on: Dec 10, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2022
Published on: Jul 11, 2022
Published by: Nordic Concrete Federation
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
digital twins,
bridges,
bridge maintenance,
bridge management systems,
BIM,
review
Related subjects:
Materials sciences,
Materials processing

© 2022 Vanessa Saback, Cosmin Popescu, Thomas Blanksvärd, Björn Täljsten, published by Nordic Concrete Federation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 66 (2022): Issue 1 (July 2022)Next article