Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Asset Management of Existing Concrete Bridges Using Digital Twins and BIM: a State-of-the-Art Literature Review Cover

Asset Management of Existing Concrete Bridges Using Digital Twins and BIM: a State-of-the-Art Literature Review

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. 1. Woodward R, Cullington D W, Daly A F, Vassie P R, Haardt P, Kashner R, Astudillo R, Velando C, Godart B & Cremona C: “Bridge management in Europe (BRIME) -Deliverable D14”. Final Report, 2001.
  2. 2. Hurt M & Schrock S: “Highway Bridge Maintenance Planning and Scheduling”. Chapter 1, “Introduction”, 2016, pp. 1–30.10.1016/B978-0-12-802069-2.00001-5
  3. 3. Khan M A: “Accelerated Bridge Construction”, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, USA, 2015, pp. 53–102.10.1016/B978-0-12-407224-4.00002-2
  4. 4. Powers N, Frangopol D M, Al-Mahaidi R & Caprani C: “Maintenance, safety, risk, management and life-cycle performance of bridges”, CRC Press, London, UK, 2018, p. 219–225.10.1201/9781315189390
  5. 5. Darbani B M & Hammad A: “Critical review of new directions in bridge management systems”. Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007, pp. 330–337.10.1061/40937(261)41
  6. 6. Boje C, Guerriero A, Kubicki S & Rezgui Y: “Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 114, No. 103179, 2020.10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179
  7. 7. Grieves M & Vickers J: “Digital Twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems”, Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 85–113.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
  8. 8. Cimino C, Negri E & Fumagalli L: “Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing”. Computers in Industry, Vol. 113, No. 103130, 2019.10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130
  9. 9. Lu Q, Parlikad A K, Woodall P, Don Ranasinghe G, Xie X, Liang Z, Konstantinou E, Heaton J & Schooling J: “Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus”. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 05020004, 2020.10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763
  10. 10. ELSEVIER: “Scopus”, ELSEVIER, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/. [Accessed 2021].
  11. 11. Morgenthal G, Hallermann N, Kersten J, Taraben J, Debus P, Helmrich M & Rodehorst V: “Framework for automated UAS-based structural condition assessment of bridges”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 97, pp. 77–95, 2019.10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.006
  12. 12. Omer M, Margetts L, Hadi Mosleh M, Hewitt S & Parwaiz M: “Use of gaming technology to bring bridge inspection to the office”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1292–1307.10.1080/15732479.2019.1615962
  13. 13. Isailovic D, Stojanovic V, Trapp M, Richter R, Hajdin R & Döllner J: “Bridge damage: Detection, IFC-based semantic enrichment and visualization”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 112, No. 103088, 2020.10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103088
  14. 14. Popescu C, Täljsten B, Blanksvärd T & Elfgren L: “3D reconstruction of existing concrete bridges using optical methods”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2019, pp. 912-924.10.1080/15732479.2019.1594315
  15. 15. Delgado J M D, Butler L J, Gibbons N, Brilakis I, Elshafie M Z E B & Middleton C: “Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM”. Bridge Engineering, Vol. 170, 2017, pp. 204-218.10.1680/jbren.16.00013
  16. 16. Butler L J, Elshafie M Z E B & Middleton C R: “Pervasive Fibre-optic sensor networks in bridges: a UK case study”. Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS, Melbourne, Australia, 2018, pp.1738-1745.10.1201/9781315189390-237
  17. 17. Xu Y & Turkan I: “BrIM and UAS for bridge inspections and management”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2019, pp. 785-807.10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0556
  18. 18. Donato V, Biagini C, Bertini G & Marsugli F: “Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of H-BIM with regards to historical infrastructures: a case study of the Ponte Giorgini in Castiglione della Pescaia (Grosseto - Italy)”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-5/W1, 2017, pp.253-260.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-253-2017
  19. 19. Riveiro B, Jauregui D V, Arias P, Armesto J & Jiang R: “An innovative method for remote measurement of minimum vertical underclearance in routine bridge inspection”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 25, 2012, pp. 34–40.10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.008
  20. 20. Sacks R, Kedar A, Borrmann A, Ma L, Brilakis I, Hüthwohl P, Daum S, Kattel U, Yosef R, Liebich I, Barutcu B E & Muhic S: “SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: Overview, information delivery manual and model view definition”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 90, 2018, pp. 134–145.10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.033
  21. 21. Banfi F, Barazzetti L, Previtali M & Roncoroni F: “Historic BIM: a new repository for structural health monitoring”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-5/W1, 2017.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-269-2017
  22. 22. Cha G, Park S & Oh T: “A Terrestrial LiDAR-Based Detection of Shape Deformation for Maintenance of Bridge Structures”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 145(12), No. 04019075, 2019.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001701
  23. 23. Barazzetti L, Banfi F, Brumana R, Previtali M & Roncoroni F: “BIM from laser scans... not just for buildings: NURBS-based parametric modeling of a medieval bridge”. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. III-5, 2016, pp. 51-56.10.5194/isprsannals-III-5-51-2016
  24. 24. McKenna T, Minehane M, O’Keeffe B, O’Sullivan G & Ruane K: “Bridge information modelling (BrIM) for a listed viaduct”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering, Vol. 170, 2017, pp.1-12.10.1680/jbren.16.00007
  25. 25. León-Robles C A, Reinoso-Gordo J F & González-Quiñones J J: “Heritage building information modeling (H-BIM) applied to a stone bridge”. International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 8, No. 121, 2019.10.3390/ijgi8030121
  26. 26. Borin P & Cavazzini F: “Condition assessment of RC bridges. Integrating machine learning, photogrammetry and BIM”, ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-2/W15, 2019, pp.201-208.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-201-2019
  27. 27. Stavroulaki M E, Riveiro B, Drosopoulos G A, Solla M, Koutsianitis P & Stavroulakis G E: “Modelling and strength evaluation of masonry bridges using terrestrial photogrammetry and finite elements”. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 101, 2016, pp. 136-148.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.007
  28. 28. Abu Dabous S, Yaghi S, Alkass S & Moselhi O: “Concrete bridge deck condition assessment using IR Thermography and Ground Penetrating Radar technologies”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 81, 2017, pp. 340-354.10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.006
  29. 29. Alani A M, Aboutalebi M & Kilic G: “Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges”. NDT&E International, Vol. 61, 2014, pp. 80-94.10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.001
  30. 30. Conde B, Ramos L F, Oliveira D V, Riveiro B & Solla M: “Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and threedimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge”. Engineering Structures, Vol. 148, 2017, pp. 621-638.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011
  31. 31. Mathworks: “MATLAB”. MathWorks, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html. [Accessed 2021].
  32. 32. McGuire B, Atadero R, Clevenger C & Ozbek M: “Bridge information modeling for inspection and evaluation”. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21(4), No. 04015076, 2016.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000850
  33. 33. Microsoft: “Excel”, Microsoft, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/svse/microsoft-365/excel. [Accessed 2021].
  34. 34. Huthwohl P, Brilakis I, Borrmann A & Sacks R: “Integrating RC bridge defect information into BIM models”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32(3), No. 04018013, 2018, pp. 1–14.10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000744
  35. 35. Jeonga S, Hou R, Lynch J P, Sohn H & Law K H: “An information modeling framework for bridge monitoring”. Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 114, 2017, pp. 11-31.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.009
  36. 36. AUTODESK: “Revit”, AUTODESK, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.autodesk.com/products/revit/overview. [Accessed 2021].
  37. 37. Boddupalli C, Sadhu A, Rezazadeh Azar E & Pattyson S: “Improved visualization of infrastructure monitoring data using Building Information Modeling”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1247-1263.10.1080/15732479.2019.1602150
  38. 38. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J & Sihn W: “Digital Twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification”. IFAC PapersOnLine, Vol. 51, No. 11, 2018, pp. 1016-1022.10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
  39. 39. Negri E, Fumagalli L & Macchi M: “A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based production systems”. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 11, 2017, pp. 939-948.10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198
  40. 40. Sacks R, Brilakis I, Pikas E, Xie H & Girolami M: “Construction with digital twin information systems”. Data-Centric Engineering, Vol. 1, No. E14, 2020.10.1017/dce.2020.16
  41. 41. Khajavi S H, Motlagh N H, Jaribion A, Werner L C & Holmstrom J: “Digital Twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings”. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 147406-147419.10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515
  42. 42. Shim C S, Dang N S, Lon S & Jeon C H: “Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1319-1332.10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789
  43. 43. Lu R & Brilakis I: “Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters”. Automation in Construction, Vol. 105, No. 102837, 2019.10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837
  44. 44. Ye C, Butler L, Calka B, Iangurazov M, Lu Q, Gregory A, Girolami M & Middleton C: “A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring”, Proceedings, 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring - IWSHM, Stanford, USA, 2019.10.12783/shm2019/32287
  45. 45. FHWA: “Bridge Preservation and Maintenance in Europe and South Africa”, Washington D.C., USA, 2005.
  46. 46. Mirzaei Z, Adey B T, Klatter L & Thompson P: “The IABMAS Bridge Management Committee Overview of Existing Bridge Management Systems”, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2014.
  47. 47. Helmerich R, Niederleithinger E, Algernon D, Streicher D & Wiggenhauser H: “Bridge inspection and condition assessment in Europe”. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2044, 2008, pp. 31–38.10.3141/2044-04
  48. 48. Thompson P D, Small E P, Johnson M & Marshall A R: “The Pontis Bridge Management System”. Structural Engineering International, Vol. 8(4), 1998, pp. 303–308.10.2749/101686698780488758
  49. 49. Gholami M, Sam A R M & Jamaludin M Y: “Assessment of Bridge Management System in Iran”. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 573-583.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.052
  50. 50. Mendonça T, Brito V & Milhazes F: “Aplicação de gestão de obras de arte - GOA - nova geração” (Bridge management application – GOA – new generation). BETAR Consultores Ltda., Lisbon, 2010 (in Portuguese).
  51. 51. Mocoso Y F M: “Modelos de Degradação para Aplicação em Sistemas de Obras de Arte Especiais – OAEs” (Degradation models for bridge application systems) (PhD Thesis), University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2017 (in Portuguese).
  52. 52. Liao H K & Yau N J: “Development of Various Bridge Condition Indices for Taiwan Bridge Management System”, Proceedings, 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Seoul, Korea, 2011, pp.911-916.10.22260/ISARC2011/0168
  53. 53. Safi M, Sundquist H, Karoumi R & Racutanu G: “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by upgrading and expanding the use of LCC”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 9(12), 2013, pp. 1240-1250.10.1080/15732479.2012.682588
  54. 54. Mirzaei Z, Adey B T, Klatter L & Thompson P: “The IABMAS bridge management committee overview of existing bridge management systems”, International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), Sapporo, Japan, 2014.
  55. 55. Chan B, Guan H, Hou L, Jo J, Blumenstein M & Wang J: “Defining a conceptual framework for the integration of modelling and advanced imaging for improving the reliability and efficiency of bridge assessments”. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 6, 2016, pp. 703-714.10.1007/s13349-016-0191-6
  56. 56. Hendy C, Brock C & Nicholls T: “Management of the M4 Elevated Section substructures”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering, No. 1600006, 2017.10.1680/jbren.16.00006
  57. 57. Previtali M, Barazzetti L, Banfi F & Roncoroni F: “Informative content models for infrastructure load testing management: The Azzone Visconti bridge in Lecco”. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XLII-2/W11, 2019, pp. 995-1001.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-995-2019
  58. 58. Tao F, Zhang M, Liu Y & Nee A Y C: “Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment”. CIRP Annals, Vol. 67, 2018, pp. 169-172.10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055
  59. 59. Brilakis I & Ariyachandra M: “Application of Railway Topology for the Automated Generation of Geometric Digital Twins of Railway Masts”. ECPPM 2021 – eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, 2021, pp. 373-380.10.1201/9781003191476-52
  60. 60. Dibernardo S: “Integrated modelling systems for bridge asset management - case study”, Structures Congress, Reston, USA, 2012, pp. 483-493.10.1061/9780784412367.043
  61. 61. Brady K C, O’Reilly M, Bevc L, Znidaric A, O’Brien E & Jordan R: “Cost 345 - Procedures required for the assessment of highway structures - Final report”. European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
  62. 62. Zhao Z, Gao Y, Hu X, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Qin G, Guo J, Liu Y, Yu C & Han D: “Integrating BIM and IoT for smart bridge management”, Proceedings, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 371, No. 022034, 2019.10.1088/1755-1315/371/2/022034
  63. 63. Zhu J, Tan Y, Wang X & Wu P: “BIM/GIS integration for web GIS-based bridge management”. Annals of GIS, Vol. 27(1), 2020, pp. 99-109.10.1080/19475683.2020.1743355
  64. 64. Marzouk M M & Hisham M: “Bridge information modelling in sustainable bridge management”. Proceedings, International Conference on Sustainable Design and Construction - ICSDC, Kansas City, USA, 2011, pp. 457-466.
  65. 65. Wan C, Zhou Z, Li S, Ding Y, Xu Z, Yang Z, Xia Y & Yin F: “Development of a bridge management system based on the building information modelling technology”. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 4583, 2019.10.3390/su11174583
  66. 66. Hallberg D & Racutanu G: “Development of the Swedish bridge management system by introducing a LMS concept”. Materials and Structures, Vol. 40, 2007, pp. 627-639.10.1617/s11527-006-9175-z
  67. 67. Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R, Glaessgen E, Kemp C, LeMoigne J & Wang L: “DRAFT Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Roadmap”, Technology Area 11, 2010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2021-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2545-2819 | Journal ISSN: 0800-6377
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 111
Submitted on: Dec 10, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2022
|
Published on: Jul 11, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Vanessa Saback, Cosmin Popescu, Thomas Blanksvärd, Björn Täljsten, published by Nordic Concrete Federation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.