Comparison of Punching Shear Design in Finland According to the Current and the Former Method

Tuomas Lehtonen; Matias Hirvikoski; Julius Rajamäki

doi:10.2478/ncr-2019-0092

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Comparison of Punching Shear Design in Finland According to the Current and the Former Method

Nordic Concrete Research

Volume 60 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)

By: Tuomas Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski and Julius Rajamäki

Open Access

|Jul 2019

Abstract

In the beginning of 2017 the design method for punching shear in Finland was changed. The method presented in Eurocode 2 was adopted with some nationally determined parameters and rules. During 2016 and 2017 computational analyses were conducted to compare the previous national design method and the new one. Comparison setups were created in which different parameters were varied. The results were presented the predicted punching resistances differ differences are significant and can be almost 60% in some cases.

References

1. EN 1992-1-1:2004: “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings”, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. The National Building Code of Finland, Part B4: “Concrete structures, regulations and guidelines 2005”. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Hirvikoski, M: “The change in punching shear resistance without shear reinforcement according to the new Finnish National Annex to Eurocode 2”, B.Sc. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Built Environment, Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Tampere, Finland, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Rajamäki J: “The change in punching shear resistance with shear reinforcement according to Eurocode 2 with Finnish National Annex”, B.Sc. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Built Environment, Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Tampere, Finland, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Leskelä, M.V.: ”EN 1992-1-1: Uusi eurocode 2 standardi betonirakenteiden suunnittelua varten”, Rakentajain Kalenteri 2003, Rakennustieto Oy, 2007. (In Finnish).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. fédération internationale du béton (fib): “Structural Concrete, Volume 2”, fib Bulletin 2, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1999.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Comité Euro-International du Béton: “CEB-FIP Model Code 1990”. Lausanne, Switzerland, 1993.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. European Concrete Platform ASBL: “Eurocode 2 Commentary (rev A 31-03-2017)”. Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. CEN: “prEN1992-1-1:2018: Final Version of PT1-draft prEN 1992-1-1 2018 D3”, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. fédération internationale du béton (fib): “Model Code 2010 – Final Draft”. fib Bulletin 66, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. CEN: “Background to prEN 1992-1-1:2018: Background documents to the final PT1 draft prEN 1992-1-1:2018”, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2019-0092 | Journal eISSN: 2545-2819 | Journal ISSN: 0800-6377

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 131 - 144

Submitted on: Sep 7, 2018

Accepted on: Jun 18, 2019

Published on: Jul 20, 2019

Published by: Nordic Concrete Federation

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

Keywords:

Related subjects:

© 2019 Tuomas Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski, Julius Rajamäki, published by Nordic Concrete Federation
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 60 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)