Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Importance of EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Development Reporting. Case Study of Entities Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in Poland Cover

The Importance of EU Taxonomy for Sustainable Development Reporting. Case Study of Entities Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in Poland

Management Systems in Production Engineering
Volume 32 (2024): Issue 3 (August 2024)
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. M. Amini, A. Rahmani, “Achieving Financial Success by Pursuing Environmental and Social Goals: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment World”, Information Technology and Engineering Journal, Vol. 10 (04), 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. A. Doś, Czynniki społecznej odpowiedzialności przedsię-biorstw – ujęcie systemowe, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 2020, pp. 21-23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. ISO 26000, Guidance on social responsibility of the International Organization for Standardization https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html, 2010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. M. Sira, “Potential of Advanced Technologies for Environmental Management Systems” Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 32 (1), pp. 33-44, 2024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2024-0004" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2024-0004</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2464
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups Text with EEA relevance, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 of 6 July 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the content and presentation of information to be disclosed by undertakings subject to Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU concerning environmentally sustainable economic activities, and specifying the methodology to comply with that disclosure obligation
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Commission Delegated Regulation [EU] 2023/2486 of 27 June 2023 supplementing Regulation [EU] 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to the sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, to the transition to a circular economy, to pollution prevention and control, or to the protection and restoration of biodiversity and eco-systems and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives and amending Commission Delegated Regulation [EU] 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. D. Daugaard, “Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: a systematic literature review, Accounting and Finance, vol. 60 (2), pp. 1501-1530, 2020. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12479" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12479</a>,
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. S. Czaja, A. Becla, „A system for accounting the costs of contemporary negative environmental phenomena – some methodological remarks: none”, Ekonomia i Środowisko. Economics and Environment, Vol. 80(1), pp. 6-20, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. D.M. Merkl-Davies, N.M. Brennan, “A Conceptual Frame-work of Impression Management: New Insights from Psychology, Sociology, and Critical Perspectives”, Accounting and Business Research Vol. 41(5), pp. 415-437. 2011 DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2011.574222" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00014788.2011.574222</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. K. Bewley and Y. Li, “Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective,” Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, vol. 1, pp. 201-226, 2000. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01011-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01011-6</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. European Banking Authority Report on ESG risks management and supervision, 2021. https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document_library/Publications/Reports/2021/1015656/EBA%20Report%20on%20ESG%20risks%20management%20and%20supervision.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. G.I.J. Kang, K. Heo, S. Jeon, “A comparison of analysts’ and investors’ information efficiency of corporate social responsibility activities”, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 15 [2], pp. 547-572, 2024, DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2023-0079" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2023-0079</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. C. Brooks, I. Oikonomou, “The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 50 (1), pp. 1-15. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.11.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.bar.2017.11.005</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. S.A Al-Tuwaijri, T.E. Christensen, K.E Hughes II, “The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 [5-6], pp. 447-471, 2004. DOI <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682[03" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0361-3682[03</a>]00032-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. B. Carroll, K.M. Shabana, “The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 [1], pp. 85-105, 2010, DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. R. Costa, T. Menichini, “A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 40 (1), pp. 150-161, 2013. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.028" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.028</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. R.E. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman Publishing, 1984
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. R.E. Freeman, R.A. Phillips, “Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 12[3], pp. 331-349, 2022. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3858020" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2307/3858020</a>,
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. M. Orlitzky, “Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 27[3], pp. 238-254, 2013.. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0097" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0097</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. S. Brammer, A. Millington, “Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 29[12], pp. 1325-1343, 2008. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.714" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.714</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. L. Xin-Yi, L. Jing-Yue, Z. Yue-Jun, “Does corporate social responsibility affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China”, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 60, 2024. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104854" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104854</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. M.L. Barnett, R.M. Salomon, “Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27[11], pp. 1101-1122 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.557" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.557</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. M. Greenwood, “The importance of stakeholders according to business leaders. Business and Society Review”, Vol. 106[1], pp. 29-49, 2001. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00100." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00100.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. F. Cavazotte, N.C. Chang, “Internal corporate social responsibility and performance: A study of publicly traded companies”., BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 13[4], pp. 1-19, 2016. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160083" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160083</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. H.Y. Ali, Hafiz Yasir; R.Q. Danish, M. Asrar-ul-Haq, “How corporate social responsibility boosts firm financial performance: The mediating role of corporate image and Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 27 (1), pp. 166-177, 2020. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1781" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/csr.1781</a>]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. A. Amel-Zadeh, G. Serafeim, “Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 74 (3), pp. 87-103, 2018. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. J. Krasodomska, “Sprawozdawczość przedsiębiorstw w świetle teorii legitymizacji,” Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, no. 13, pp. 39-51, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. K. Kwadjo; A. Donkor, “Integrated reporting quality and sustainability performance: does firms’ environmental sensitivity matter?” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 14 (1), pp. 25-47, 2024. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2022-0058" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/JAEE-02-2022-0058</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Z. Yang, T.T.H. Nguyen, H.N. Nguyen, T.T.N. Nguyen, T.T. Cao, “Greenwashing behaviours: causes, taxonomy and consequences based on a systematic literature review”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 21[5], pp. 1486-1507, 2020. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13225" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13225</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. D. Beerbaum, “The search for an holistic ESG Taxonomy”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, DOI:<a href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4748528" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2139/ssrn.4748528</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions the European Green Deal COM/2019/640 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Regulation [EU] 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the Establishment of a Framework to Facilitate Sustainable Investment, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32020R0852
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Commission Delegated Regulation [EU] 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation [EU] 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R2139
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. F. Schütze, J. Stede, M. Blauert, K. Erdmann, “EU taxonomy increasing transparency of sustainable investments”, DIW Weekly Report, Vol. 10, pp. 485-492, 2020. <a href="https://doi.org/10.18723/diw_dwr:2020-51-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.18723/diw_dwr:2020-51-1</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. C. Lucarelli, C. Mazzoli, C.M. Rancan, S. Severini, “Classification of Sustainable Activities: EU Taxonomy and Scientific Literature”, Sustainability, Vol. 12(16) 6460, 2020. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166460" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166460</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. G.F. Hoepner, F.I. Schneider, “EU Green Taxonomy Data – A First Vendor Survey”, Econst Voice, Vol. 6, 19(2), pp. 229-24. 2022. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2022-0022" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2022-0022</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2088
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. M. Mikołajek-Gocejna, “Systematic Risk of ESG Companies Listed on the Polish Capital Market in 2019-2022”, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 25 (2), 2022 https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/101177
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. R.E. Dumrose, S. Rink, J. Eckert, “Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating”, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 48, 2022. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102928" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102928</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. L. Bohdanowicz, M. Aluchna, „Determinanty dokonań pol-skich spółek publicznych w zakresie ESG”. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 67[4], pp. 23-33, 2023. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2023.4.03" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15611/pn.2023.4.03</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. M. Aluchna, M. Roszkowska-Menkes, B. Kamiński, “From talk to action: the effects of the non-financial reporting directive on ESG performance”, Meditari Accountancy Research Vol. 31(7), 2023 pp. 1-25. 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. KPMG 2023 Report: Setting the baseline towards transparency, https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pl/pdf/2022/10/pl-Raport-Setting-the-baseline-towards-transparency.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Global ESG Monitor (GEM) 2022, https://globalesgmonitor.com/the-gem-2022-regional-report-poland/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. https://www.orlen.pl/en/investor-relations/reports-and-publications/financial-results
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. https://www.gkpge.pl/dla-inwestorow
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. https://pgnig.pl/relacje-inwestorskie/prezentacje-i-mate-rialy/raporty-roczne
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. https://kghm.com/pl/inwestorzy/centrum-wyni-kow/raporty-finansowe
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. https://www.jsw.pl/relacje-inwestorskie/raporty-gieldowe/raporty-okresowe/raporty-okresowe-2023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. https://grupakety.com/relacje-inwestorskie/grupa-kety-na-gpw/raporty-okresowe-i-prezentacje/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. https://corporate.ccc.eu/raporty
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. https://www.orange.pl/view/csr
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. https://www.proto.pl/aktualnosci/wybrano-najlepsze-ra-porty-esg-w-polsce
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2024-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5781 | Journal ISSN: 2299-0461
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 317 - 325
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2024
Published on: Sep 5, 2024
Published by: STE Group sp. z.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
CSR,
CSRD,
sustainable development,
environmental investments,
financial statement,
IFRS
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Tools and methods,
Production technology,
Process engineering and industrial engineering,
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2024 Aleksandra Sulik-Górecka, Witold Biały, Marzena Strojek-Filus, published by STE Group sp. z.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 32 (2024): Issue 3 (August 2024)Next article