Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Development of Technological Support Organizations as an Indicator of Management Efficiency Cover

The Development of Technological Support Organizations as an Indicator of Management Efficiency

Management Systems in Production Engineering
Volume 31 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
By: Inna Balahurovska  
Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. [1] Private production and commercial enterprise “Ag-rosvit“ https://clarity-project.info/edr/31787428
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Non-governmental organization Garden Cooperative “Budivelnyk-2” https://opendatabot.ua/c/23631909
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] M. Alavi and D.E. Leidner, “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, v. 25, no. 1, p. 107. 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions”, Decision Sciences, v. 39, no. 2, pp. 273-315. 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] A.H. Gold, A. Malhotra and A.H. Segars, “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), pp. 185-214. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] A. Kuzior and A. Kwilinski, “Cognitive Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Social Perception”, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30(2), pp. 109-115. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] A. Kuzior, A. Kwilinski and V. Tkachenko, “Sustainable development of organizations based on the combinatorial model of artificial intelligence” Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 7(2), pp. 1353-1376. 2019. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(39)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] A. Kuzior, K. Kettler and Ł. Rąb, “Digitalization of Work and Human Resources Processes as a Way to Create a Sustainable and Ethical Organization”, Energies, 15(1), p. 172. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010172
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] A. Kuzior, O. Arefieva, A. Kovalchuk, P. Brożek, V. Tytykalo, “Strategic Guidelines for the Intellectualization of Human Capital in the Context of Innovative Transformation” Sustainability, 14(19), p. 11937. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911937
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] U. Bodkhe, S. Tanwar, K. Parekh, P. Khanpara, S. Tyagi, N. Kumar and M. Alazab, “Blockchain for Industry 4.0: A Comprehensive Review”, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 79764-79800. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988579
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] V. Chamola, V. Hassija, V. Gupta and M. Guizani, “A Comprehensive Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Role of IoT, Drones, AI, Blockchain, and 5G in Managing its Impact”, IEEE Access, 8, pp. 90225-90265, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2992341
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] S. Luthra, A. Kumar, E.K. Zavadskas, S.K. Mangla and J.A. Garza-Reyes, “Industry 4.0 as an enabler of sustainability diffusion in supply chain: an analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emerging economy”, International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), pp. 1505-1521, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Y. Wu, Y. Wu, J.M. Guerrero and J.C. Vasquez, “Digitalization and decentralization driving transactive energy Internet: Key technologies and infrastructures”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 126, pp. 106593. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106593
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] M.-L. Tseng, K.-J. Wu, M.K. Lim and W.-P. Wong, “Datadriven sustainable supply chain management performance: A hierarchical structure assessment under uncertainties”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, pp. 760-771. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.201
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Z. Bao, W. Lu, “A decision-support framework for planning construction waste recycling: A case study of Shenzhen, China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, pp. 127449. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127449
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] K. Salah, N. Nizamuddin, R. Jayaraman and M. Omar, “Blockchain-Based Soybean Traceability in Agricultural Supply Chain”, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 73295-73305. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2918000
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] P. Centobelli, R. Cerchione, D. Chiaroni, P. Del Vecchio, A. Urbinati, “Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), pp. 1734-1749. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] A. Kwilinski, V. Tkachenko and A. Kuzior, “Transparent cognitive technologies to ensure sustainable society development”, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, pp. 561-570. 2019. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.9.2(15)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] A. Kuzior, O. Vyshnevskyi and N. Trushkina, “Assessment of the Impact of Digitalization on Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the Example of EU Member States” Production Engineering Archives, 28(4), pp. 407-419. 2022. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2022.28.50
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] P. Fobel and A. Kuzior, “The future (Industry 4.0) is closer than we think. Will it also be ethical?”. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019, 2186, 080003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques, 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers, 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] State Statistics Service of Ukraine, https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] B. Roberts, What Is Profit? Rethinking Marxism, 1(1), pp. 136-151. 1988. doi:10.1080/08935698808657792
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] M. Habib and C. Jubb, NGO, Social Capital and Microfinance: a Conceptual Model. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development 06:04, pp. 67-78. 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] M. Hicks and S. Nettles, “Dynamic software updating”, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 27(6), pp. 1049-1096. 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1108970.1108971
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] G. Grossman and H. Elhanan, “Fair Wages and Foreign Sourcing in E. Helpman, D. Marin, and T.Verdier eds.”, The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, Harvard University Press (3) (PDF) Fairness, Search Frictions, and Offshoring. 2008. URL: https://www.resear-chgate.net/publication/254424865_Fairness_Search_Frictions_and_Offshoring
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] T. Ericson, “Personnel training: A theoretical and empirical review”, Working Paper, No. 2005:1, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), Uppsala. 2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] A. Kuzior, “Technological Unemployment in the Perspective of Industry 4.0 Development”, Virtual Economics, 5(1), pp. 7-23. 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] M. Krynke, “Management optimizing the costs and duration time of the process in the production system”, Prod. Eng. Arch., 27 (3), pp. 163-170, 2021. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2021.27.21
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] M. Matuszny, “Building decision trees based on production knowledge as support in decision-making process”, Prod. Eng. Arch., 26 (2), pp. 36-40. 2020. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.08
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] R. Wolniak, “Main functions of operation management”, Prod. Eng. Arch., 26, (1), pp. 11-14. 2020. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] M. Sira, “Efficient Practices of Cognitive Technology Application for Smart Manufacturing”, Manage. Syst. Prod. Eng., 30 (2), pp. 187-191, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] C. Williams, Effective Management. Cengage Learning, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2023-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5781 | Journal ISSN: 2299-0461
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 242 - 247
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2023
Published on: May 3, 2023
Published by: STE Group sp. z.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
effective management,
humanistic management,
manager,
technological support,
technologies
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Tools and methods,
Process engineering and industrial engineering

© 2023 Inna Balahurovska, published by STE Group sp. z.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 31 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)