Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors, Increasing the Efficiency of Work of Maintenance, Repair and Operation Units of Industrial Enterprises Cover

Factors, Increasing the Efficiency of Work of Maintenance, Repair and Operation Units of Industrial Enterprises

Management Systems in Production Engineering
Volume 30 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
By: Marek Krynke,  Tatiana N. Ivanova and  Nicolay F. Revenko  
Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. [1] Z.B. Khmelnitskaya. Organizational and economic problems of increasing the efficiency of production and technical services. Ural University. 205 p. 1987.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] A.N. Vodolazov. Economic assessment of the activities of auxiliary production facilities of the enterprise: methodology and tools. DonSTU. 22 p. 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] V.N. Goncharov, O.A. Burbelo, A.I. Vavin. The efficiency of the production infrastructure of enterprises. LOT. 164 p. 1994.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] L.N. Dragun. Improving the economic management of repair production (theory and practice). Irkutsk University Publ., 140 p. 1985.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] R.N. Kolegaev, K.I. Melnikova, B.I. Krivoberets. Efficiency of the repair service of the enterprise and association. Technique, 160 p. 1976.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] G.A. Morgun. Efficiency management of enterprises in the conditions of reforming the electric power industry. UPI, 192 p. 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] V.K. Myltsev. Questions of increasing the organizational and technical level and efficiency of repair production. UPI. 25 p. 1981.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] U.F. Nasibullin. Interplant management of the repair service. SPb GIEA. 17 p. 1997.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] S.F. Pokropivny. Efficiency of car repair. Tekhnika, 256 p. 1975.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] R.R. Stepanova. Methods and tools for increasing the economic efficiency of repair services of chemical enterprises. D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia. 145 p. 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] N.G. Chumachenko. Problems of organizing the effective functioning of auxiliary production in mechanical engineering. IEM USSR Academy of Sciences, 30 p. 1979.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] J. Tabor. Ranking of management factors for safe maintenance system based on Grey Systems Theory. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(3), pp. 196-202, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2610.30657/pea.2021.27.26
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] K. Kowalik, D. Klimecka-Tatar. The process approach to service quality management. Production Engineering Archives. issue 18, pp. 31-34 doi:10.30657/pea.2018.18.05. 2018.10.30657/pea.2018.18.05
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] R. Ulewicz, M. Mazur. Economic aspects of robotization of production processes by example of a car semi-trailers manufacturer, Manufacturing Technology. 19(6), pp. 1054-1059, doi: 10.21062/ujep/408.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/6/1054. 2019.10.21062/ujep/417.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/6/1054
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] J. Furman. Work Safety Improvement Within Autonomous Maintenance. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering MAPE 2020, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 161-171 https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2020-0014.2020.10.2478/mape-2020-0014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] P. Gackowiec. General overview of maintenance strategies – concepts and approaches Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering MAPE 2019, vol. 2, issue 1, https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0013.2019.10.2478/mape-2019-0013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] B. Al-Najjar, & I. Alsyouf, I. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Economics, 84(1), pp. 85-100. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8.10. 2003.10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] H. Cherkaoui, K.T. Huynh, & A. Grall. On the Assessment of Performance and Robustness of Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V. 49(12), pp. 809-814. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.874.10.1016.10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.874
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] J. Mikler. Life Cycle Costing Used for Justifying Transition to Predictive Maintenance Strategies. Journal of Machine Engineering, 11(4), 2011. pp. 49-58.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] J. Tabor. Maintenance management and occupational safety in manufacturing organizations. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 10 (2), pp. 225-235. 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] E.C. Özcan, S. Ünlüsoy, & T. Eren. A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier Ltd, 78 (May 2016), pp. 1410-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039. 2016.10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] L. Oubahman, S. Duleba. Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation, Production Engineering Archives. 27(1), pp. 69-74. doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.9. 2021.10.30657/pea.2021.27.9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] D.L. Krutikhin. V.E. Lyalin. Application of queuing systems to improve the efficiency of maintenance and equipment repair services at an industrial enterprise//Mathematical models and information technologies in the organization of production. no. 2 (23). pp. 48-52. 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] V.M. Semyonov. Problems of the efficiency of maintenance of mechanical engineering production. UPI. 40 p. 1978.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] K. Knop. Analysing the machines working time utilization for improvement purposes. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(2), pp. 137-147, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.1810.30657/pea.2021.27.18
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] N.F. Revenko. The economic mechanism in repair production (on the example of industrial associations and enterprises of the mechanical engineering industry). IEP AN UkrSSR. 351 p. 1991.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Z.B. Khmelnitskaya. Organization and management of production and technical maintenance of mechanical engineering enterprises. 1992.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] M. Krynke. Management optimizing the costs and duration time of the process in the production system. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(3), pp. 163-170, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2110.30657/pea.2021.27.21
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5781 | Journal ISSN: 2299-0461
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 97
Published on: Feb 12, 2022
Published by: STE Group sp. z.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
maintenance,
repair and operation (MRO),
method of organization of work of equipment MRO service,
level of economic autonomy of MRO enterprise
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Tools and methods,
Process engineering and industrial engineering

© 2022 Marek Krynke, Tatiana N. Ivanova, Nicolay F. Revenko, published by STE Group sp. z.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 30 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)