Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Corporate Social Responsibility Standards: Is it Possible to Meet Diverse Customer Requirements? Cover

Corporate Social Responsibility Standards: Is it Possible to Meet Diverse Customer Requirements?

Management Systems in Production Engineering
Volume 30 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
By: Andrea Sütőová and  Ferdinand Kóča  
Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. [1] W. L. Cheng and J. Ahmad. “Incorporating stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility (CSR): A case study at multinational corporations (MNCs) in Penang”. Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 6 no. 4, pp. 593-610, 2010.10.1108/17471111011083464
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] F. Mosca and C. Civera. “The Evolution of CSR: An Intergrated Approach”. Emerging Issues in Management, vol. 17 no. 1, pp. 16-35, 2017.10.4468/2017.1.03mosca.civera
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] P.C. Chiesa and W. Przychodzen. “Social sustainability in supply chain: a review”, Social Responsibility Journal. vol. 16 no. 8, pp. 1125-1148, 2019.10.1108/SRJ-11-2018-0301
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] M. Andersen and T. Skjoett-Larsen. “Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains”. Supply Chain Management, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 75-86, 2009.10.1108/13598540910941948
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] H. Hofmann, C. Busse, C. Bode and M. Henke. “Sustainability-Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management”. Bussines, Strategy and Environment, vol. 23 no. 3, pp. 160-172, 2013.10.1002/bse.1778
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] M. Zhang, Y. K. Tse, B. Doherty, S, Li and P. Akhtar. “Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 128 no. 1, pp. 206-221, 2018.10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] R. Medina-Serrano, M. Ramirez, J. Gasco. and J. L. Taverner. “Sustainable Supplier Evaluation practices across the Supply Chain”. Direccion y Organizacion. vol. 69, pp. 13-26, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] S. Colwell, M. Zyphur, and M. Schminke. “When does ethical code enforcement matter in the inter-organizational context? The moderating role of switching costs”. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 104 no. 1, pp. 47-58, 2011.10.1007/s10551-011-0888-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] UNCTAD. Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chain: Evaluation and monitoring challenges for small and medium sized suppliers in developing countries. UN: Geneva 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] D. Harms, E. Hansen and S. Schaltegger. “Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Investigation of Large German Companies”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 20 no. 4, pp. 205-218, 2012.10.1002/csr.1293
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] D. E. Boyd, R. E. Spekman, J. W. Kamauff, and P. Werhane. “Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective”. Long Range Planning, vol. 40 no 3, pp. 341-356, 2007.10.1016/j.lrp.2006.12.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] E. Delbufalo and M. Bastl. “Multi-principal collaboration and supplier’s compliance with codes-of-conduct”. The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 29 no. 4, pp. 1237-1254, 2018.10.1108/IJLM-09-2017-0222
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] M. Risso. “A horizontal approach to implementing corporate social responsibility in international supply chains”. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 58 no. 1/2, pp. 64-81, 2012.10.1504/IJTM.2012.045789
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] M. Asif, M. S. Jajja and C. Searcy. “Social compliance standards: Re-evaluating the buyer and supplier perspectives”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 227, pp. 457-471, 2019.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.157
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] M. Formentini and P. Taticchi. “Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112 no 3, pp. 1920-1933, 2016.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.072
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] E.R. Pedersen and M. Andersen. “Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: How codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships”. Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 6 no. 3-4, pp. 228-240, 2006.10.1002/pa.232
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] F. Ciliberti, D. Baden, and I. A. Harwood, “Insights into Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Supply Chains: A Multiple Case Study of SMEs in the UK”. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 2 no. 3, pp. 154-166, 2009.10.31387/oscm050028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] ISO. “Certification, verification, assessment”. Internet: https://iso26000.info/certification/ [June 22, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] A. Nagyova, M. Balazikova, and S. Markulik. “Implementation Proposal of OH&S Management System According to the Standard ISO/DIS 45001”, in: Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors, AHFE 2017. P. Arezes, Ed. Sringer, pp. 472-485, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-60525-8_49
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Nenadál. “The New EFQM Model: What Is Really New And Could Be Considered As A Suitable Tool With Respect To Quality 4.0 Concept”. Quality, Innovation, Prosperity, vol. 14 no. 1, pp. 17-28, 2020.10.12776/qip.v24i1.1415
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] I. Slimák and K. Zgodavová. “Focus on Success”. Quality Innovation Prosperity, vol. 15 no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2011.10.12776/qip.v15i1.36
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] K. Teplická, S. Hurná. and D. Spirková. “Evaluation of Environment Efficiency”. Quality – Access to Success, vol. 21 no. 177, pp. 104-107, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] ISO. ISO 26000 Guidance on Social Responsibility. ISO, Geneva, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] IQ Net. IQ Net SR10 Social Responsibility Management Systems Requirements. IQ Net: Bern, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] SAI. SA8000 Social Accountability. SAI: New York, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Smeta. “Smeta Guidance”. Internet: www.sedex.com/our-services/smeta-audit/smeta-documents/ [May 14, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Amorfi (2019). “Amorfi BSCI”. Internet: www.amfori.org/content/amfori-bsci [May 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] ETI. “ETI Base Code”. Internet: www.ethicaltrade.org/eti-base-code [May 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Intertek. “Workplace Condition Assessment”. Internet: www.intertek.com/assurance/wca/ [June 20, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] H. Kohl. Standards for Management Systems. Springer: Switzerland, 2020.10.1007/978-3-030-35832-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] M.D. Odriozola and E. Baraibar-Diez: “Is Corporate Reputation Associated with Quality of CSR Reporting? Evidence from Spain”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Vol. 88 no. 15, pp. 121-132, 2017.10.1002/csr.1399
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] RBA. “RBA Validated Assessment Program”. Internet: www.responsiblebusiness.org/code-of-conduct/ [June 22, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Electrolux. “Sustainability Report 2019”. Internet: www.electroluxgroup.com/en [June 22, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] BSH. “Global Supply Chain”. Internet: www.bsh-group.com/company/global-supply-chain [May 18, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] IATF. IATF 16949:2016 Automotive Quality Management System Standard: Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations. Southfield: AIAG. 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Drive Sustainability. “SAQ 3.0 available for Automotive Sector Suppliers”. Internet: www.drivesustainability.org/saq-3-0/ [May 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] EcoVadis. “Sustainability Assessment”. Internet: https://ecovadis.com/suppliers/ [June 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] BMW. “Supply Chain Management”. Internet: www.bmwgroup.com/en/responsibility/supply-chain-management.html [May 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Daimler. “Supplier Sustainability Standards”. Internet: https://supplier-portal.daimler.com/docs/DOC-1458 [June 10, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Ford. “Sustainability Strategy”. Internet: https://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2020/sustainability-strategy.html [May 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] PSA Group. “A Responsible Purchasing Policy”. Internet: www.groupe-psa.com/en/responsible-purchasing-policy/ [May 10, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] PSA Group. “The B2B Portal”. Internet: http://b2b.psa-peugeot-citroen.com/pages/en-US/info.aspx [May 10, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Volkswagen Group. “Compliance”. Internet: www.volkswagenag.com/en/group/compliance-andriskmanagement/compliance.html# [May 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] FCA. “Sustainability”. Internet: www.fcagroup.com/en-US/sustainability/Pages/guidelines.aspx [May 14, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Responsible Steel. “Certification Resources”. Internet: www.responsiblesteel.org/certification/certification-resources/ [June 22, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Thyssenkrupp. “Responsible Procurement”. Internet: www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/company/procurement/responsible-procurement [June 15, 2020].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] M. Giacalone, V. Santarcangelo, V. Donvito, O. Schiavone and E. Massa. “Big data for corporate social responsibility: blockchain use in Gioia del Colle DOP.” Quality and Quantity, 2021.10.1007/s11135-021-01095-w781806433495664
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] V.G. Venkatesh, K. Kang, B. Wang, R.Y. Zhong, A. Zhang. “System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability”. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol 63, 2020.10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101896
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] A. Kuzior, A. Kwilinski, V. Tkachenko. “Sustainable Development of Organizations Based on the Combinatorial Model of Artificial Intelligence”. Enterpreneurship and Sustainability Issues, vol. 7 no. 2, pp. 1354-1376, 2019.10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(39)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] E. Napier. Technology Enabled Social Responsibility Projects and an Empirical Test of CSR’s Impact on Firm Performance. Georgia State University: Atlanta, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] A. Kwilinski and A. Kuzior. “Cognitive Technologies in the Management and Formation of Directions of the Priority Development of Industrial Enterprises”. Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 28 no. 2, pp. 133-138, 2020.10.2478/mspe-2020-0020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] E. Bertino, B. Catania and G. P. Zarri. Intelligent Database Systems, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.: Boston, 2001.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] K. Zgodavova and I. Slimak. “Advanced Improvement of Quality”. Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 1551-1553, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5781 | Journal ISSN: 2299-0461
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 61
Published on: Feb 12, 2022
Published by: STE Group sp. z.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
audit,
customer requirements,
codes of conduct,
corporate social responsibility,
supply chain
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Tools and methods,
Process engineering and industrial engineering

© 2022 Andrea Sütőová, Ferdinand Kóča, published by STE Group sp. z.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 30 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)Next article