The Project Management Triangle Assessment in Aeronautical Industries, Morocco: Focus on Eco-Logistics

Adlane, Hamza; Seghiri, Rajaa; Aouane, Mahjoub; Berrid, Nabyl; Chaouch, Abdelaziz

doi:10.2478/mspe-2021-0017

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the management systems of quality, cost, and deadlines during the environment friendly transition process. Some 102 companies operating in the aeronautics industry in Morocco were surveyed during the period of May 2019 to December 2019. The results showed that about nearly 80% to 96% of the companies confirmed having effective systems for monitoring and improving quality, cost management, and respect for deadlines. But, unfortunately, below 80% of these companies are respecting the environment. The environment is considered as a constraint, and its respect is mainly related to the requirements of standards, certifications and laws Therefore, we find a great shortfall of these Moroccan companies when it comes to respect the environment. The analysis of the results reveals that some indicators imply the desire and predisposition of these companies to go beyond the classic concept of the logistics triptych quality/cost/time to a whole new concept: quality/cost/delay/environment.

References

[1] S. Ait Iaza and R. Daanoune, “Environmental Performance Measurement Tools:Case of an Aeronautic Company in Morocco”, Revue du Contrôle de la Comptabilité et de l’Audit, Vol. 4, pp. 449-474, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] C. Argyris and D. Schon. Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley, pp. 8, 1987.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] E. Ballery. Evolution de la qualité: le bilan, vingt ans après !. Qualité et mouvement, Vol. 62, pp. 20-30, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] L. Bardin. L’analyse de contenu, Presses Universitaires De France – PUF, Vol. 2, 2013.10.3917/puf.bard.2013.01
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] B. Braun and F. Collignon. La France en fiches, Editions Bréal, pp. 335, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] G.H. Brundtland. “Our common future”, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nations, 1987.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] R. Calvet. Le sol: propriétés et fonctions. Phénomènes physiques et chimiques, applications agronomiques et environnementales, France Agricole Editions, 2003, pp. 511.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] H. Cormier. Rapport environnement 2014, DGAC, 2014, pp. 23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] C. Doucet. La Qualité, Que sais-je ?, Presses Universitaires De France – PUF, 2007, pp. 6.10.3917/puf.douce.2007.01
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] D. Emmanuel and E. Kam Yogo and L. Ngo-Samnick. Manuel judiciaire de droit de l’environnement en Afrique, Institut de la Francophonie pour le développement durable, 2008, pp. 252.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Federal Aviation authority. The Economic Impact of Commercial Space Transportation on the US Economy in 2009, FAA, 2010, pp. 9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] M. Gaeta and G. Achilleas and G. Samaras and R. Archetti. “Numerical investigation of thermal discharge to coastal areas: A case study in South Italy”, Environmental Modelling and Software. Vol. 124, No.104596, Feb. 2020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] S. Ganassali. Enquêtes et analyse de données avec Sphinx. Pearson France, 2014, pp. 234.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] S. Grabowska. “Smart Factories in the Age of Industry 4.0”, Management Systems in Production Engineering, Vol. 28, pp. 92, 2020.10.2478/mspe-2020-0014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] G. Herniaux. Commanditer un projet: le rôle des dirigeants pour la réussite des projets, Insep Editions, 2001, pp. 119.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Ouédraogo. (2004). Alliances stratégiques dans les pays en voie de développement, spécificité, management et conditions de performance, Publibook 2, 2004, pp. 341.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] “Inclusive Growth Commission. Making our economy work for everyone” Internet: https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/final-report-ofthe-inclusive-growth-commission, Mar., 2017 [Aug. 19, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] R. Klassen and P. Johnson. Understanding Supply Chains – Concepts, Critiques and Futures, The green supply chain, Steve New and Roy Westbrook, 2004, pp. 229-251.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] P. Lemaire. Psychologie cognitive, De Boeck, pp. 582, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] G. Melyon and K. Melyon and P. Raimbourg. Comptabilité analytique: Principes, coûts réels constatés, coûts préétablis, analyse des écarts, Bréal. pp. 287, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] Y. Metay and C. Rudelle. Economie-droit Tle STG, Bréal, pp. 223, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] Y. Michot. “Rapport sur l’industrie aéronautique et spatiale française”, République francaise, France, Paris, rep 08082003, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] F. Moutaoukil. “Le Pilotage De La Performance Des Fournisseurs Par Les Pratiques De Gestions De Chaine Logistique (Supply Chain Management) Et L’apport De L’audit Combine «Qualité-Logistique» « Cas De Renault Tanger”; European Scientific Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 117, june. 2018.10.19044/esj.2018.v14n16p117
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] F. Moutaoukil and M. A. M’barki and S. Boungab“ Le Pilotage De La Performance Des Fournisseurs par Les Pratiques De Gestions De Chaine Logistique (Supply Chain Management) Et L’apport De L’audit combine «Qualité-Logistique» «Cas De Renault Tanger»“, European Scientific Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 117, June 2018.10.19044/esj.2018.v14n16p117
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[25] OCDE. Le financement des PME et des entrepreneurs 2012 Tableau de bord de l’OCDE: Tableau de bord de l’OCDE, OCDE Publishing, pp. 212, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[26] Office of Government Commerce. Reussir Le Management De Projet Avec Prince2/Successful Project Management With Prince2 (Français), Broché, pp. 369, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[27] O. Seroka-Stolka. The development of green logistics for implementation sustainable development strategy in companies, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 151, pp. 302-309, June 201810.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.028
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[28] A. Siddiqi and R. Collins. (2017, Feb.). “Sociotechnical systems and sustainability: current and future perspectives for inclusive development”, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. [On-line]. vol. 24, pp. 7-13. Available: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.006. [Sep. 23, 2019].10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[29] M. Stanley. (2017). ”Space: Investing in the Final Frontier”. Internet: https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/investing-in-space.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[30] M. Sheetz. (2018). “Space Companies Received $3.9 Billion in Private Investment during the Year of the Commercial Launch, CNBC.” Internet: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/18/space-companies-got-3-point-9-billion-in-venture-capital-last-year-report.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[31] J.P Tack. Introduction à la norme ISO14001, Wolters Kluwer Belgium, pp. 13, 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Project Management Triangle Assessment in Aeronautical Industries, Morocco: Focus on Eco-Logistics

Abstract

Paradigm

My account