Have a personal or library account? Click to login
New Approach of Costs of Quality According their Trend of During Long Period in Industrial Enterprises in SMEs Cover

New Approach of Costs of Quality According their Trend of During Long Period in Industrial Enterprises in SMEs

Management Systems in Production Engineering
Volume 29 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
By: Katarína Teplická and  Soňa Hurná  
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. [1] A. Alglawe, A. Schiffauerova, O. Kuzgunkaya. “Analysing the cost of quality within a supply chain using system dynamics approach.” Total quality management and Business Excellence, vol.30, no. 15-16, pp. 1630-1653, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] A.K. Pattanayak, A. Prakash, R.P. Mohanty. “Risk analysis of estimates for cost of quality in supply chain: a case study.“ Production Planning & Control, vol. 30, no 4, pp. 299-314, 2019.10.1080/09537287.2018.1541488
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] D. Bamford, N. Land. “The application and use of the PAF quality costing model within a footwear company.” International journal of quality and reliability management, vol. 23, no.3, pp. 265-271, 2006.10.1108/02656710610648224
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] R. Colin, B. Falk, M. Durlich, R. Jochem. “Do quality costs still matter?” Total quality management & business excellence, vol. 26, no. 7-8, pp. 1-12, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] P. Cremieux, S.N. Finkelstein, E.R. Berndt et al. “Cost effectiveness, Quality - Adjusted Life-years and supportive care.“ Pharmacoeconomics, no.16, pp. 459-472, 1999.10.2165/00019053-199916050-0000410662393
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] J. Hrubec, E. Virčíková, a kol. Integrovaný manažérsky systém. SPU: Nitra, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] S. Hurná, K. Teplická, M. Straka. “Use of statistical quantitative methods for monitoring quality parameters of raw materials.“ Przemysl chemiczny, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 59-63, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] CH.Y. Ching. “Improving the definition and quantification of quality costs.” Total quality management & business excellence, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 175-191, 2008.10.1080/14783360701600563
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Š. Markulik, et al. “Causal dependence of events under management system conditions.” MM Science Journal, vol. 10, pp. 1040-1042, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Š. Markulik, R. Kozel. “Transformation of product characteristics in terms of a management system.” MM Science Journal. vol. 20, pp. 900-902, 2016.10.17973/MMSJ.2016_06_201607
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] M. Rosiawan, M. L. Singgih, E. Widodo. “Model of quality costs and economic benefits of a business process of manufacturing companies.” Cogent Engineering, vol 6, no 1, pp. 125-132, 2019.10.1080/23311916.2019.1678228
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] H. Pačaiová, J. Sinay, A. Nagyová. “Development of GRAM - A risk measurement tool using risk based thinking principles.” Measurement, vol. 100, pp. 288-296, 2017.10.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] F. Sgardea, M. Stanila, O. Georgiana, M.C. Partal. “Total quality cost - a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis in managerial accounting.” Metalurgia, vol. 15, pp. 49-52, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] A. Schiffauerova, V. Thomson. “A review of research on cost of quality models and best practices”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 23 no. 6, pp. 647-669, 2006.10.1108/02656710610672470
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] K. Soundararajan, K.J. Reddy. “Cost reduction and quality improvement using DMAIC in the SMEs.” Internationl journal of productivity and performance management, vol. 68, no 8, pp. 1-15, 2019.10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0360
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] S. Sturm, G. Keiser, E. Hartmann. “Long run dynamic between cost of quality and quality performance.” International journal of quality and reliability management, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 78-86, 2019.10.1108/IJQRM-05-2018-0118
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] A. Sütőová, S. Segiňáková. “Improving information flow for decision making on product quality in the automotive industry.” Quality Innovation Prosperity, vol. 22, no 1, pp. 71-78, 2018.10.12776/qip.v22i1.1082
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] A. Sütőová, M. Šolc. “Utilization of statistical methods within the European Performance satisfaction index rating methodology.” Quality, Innovation, Prosperity, vol. 13, no 1, pp. 77-83, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] A. Šatanová, J. Závadský, M. Sedliačiková, M. Potkány, Z. Závadská, M. Holíková. “How Slovak small and medium manufacturing enterprises maintain quality costs: an empirical study and proposal for a suitable model.” Total Quality management and Business Excellence, vol. 25, no 6, pp. 146-154, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] E. Škvareková, et al. “Analysis of Risk Factors for Underground Coal Gasification.“ Management Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 27, no 4, pp. 227-235, 2019.10.1515/mspe-2019-0036
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] F. Talib, Z. Rahman, M.N. Quereshi. “Prioritizing the practices of total quality management: An analytic hierarchy process analysis for the service industries.” Total Quality Management, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1331-1351, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] K. Teplická, M. Pavlíčková. “Economic indicators of quality of quality and theri influence on cost effectiveness,“ in Proceedings of the scientific conference quality and leading innovation“ Hradec Králové, Czech Republic 2014, pp. 105-116.10.12776/QALI.V1.9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] K. Teplická, S. Hurná, J. Kádárová. “Comparison of Using Managerial Instruments in Industry Companies in Slovakia and the Czech Republic.“ Technology, Education, Management, Informatics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1191-1197, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] J. Závadský, et al. “Competences in the quality management system evaluation based on the most worldwide used key performance indicators.” Quality - Access to Success, vol. 20, no 169, pp. 29-41, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] K. Zgodavová, M. Kisela, A. Sütőová. “Intelligent approaches for an organisation’s management system change.” TQM Journal, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 760-773, 2016.10.1108/TQM-10-2015-0130
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2021-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2450-5781 | Journal ISSN: 2299-0461
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 26
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2020
Published on: Dec 2, 2020
Published by: STE Group sp. z.o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
cost,
efficiency,
indicators,
profit,
quality
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Tools and methods,
Process engineering and industrial engineering

© 2020 Katarína Teplická, Soňa Hurná, published by STE Group sp. z.o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)Next article