Design with Use of 3D Printing Technology

Rozmus, Magdalena; Dobrzaniecki, Piotr; Siegmund, Michał; Herrero, Juan Alfonso Gómez

doi:10.2478/mspe-2020-0040

Abstract

Dynamic development of 3D printing technology contributes to its wide applicability. FDM (Fused Deposition Method) is the most known and popular 3D printing method due to its availability and affordability. It is also usable in design of technical objects – to verify design concepts with use of 3D printed prototypes. The prototypes are produced at lower cost and shorter time comparing to other manufacturing methods and might be used for a number of purposes depending on designed object’s features they reflect. In the article, usability of 3D printing method FDM for designing of technical objects is verified based on sample functional prototypes. Methodology applied to develop these prototypes and their stand tests are covered. General conclusion is that 3D printed prototypes manufactured with FDM method proved to be useful for verifying new concepts within design processes carried out in KOMAG.

References

[1] A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi. “Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 36, pp. 164-174, Dec. 201810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] D. Bałaga, M. Kalita, M. Siegmund. „Use of 3D additive manufacturing technology for rapid prototyping of spraying nozzles”. Mining Machines, vol. 3 pp. 3-13, Sep. 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] C. Baletti, M. Ballarin, F. Guerra. “3D printing: State of the art and future perspectives.” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 26, pp. 172-182, Mar. 201710.1016/j.culher.2017.02.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] C. Buchanan, L. Gardner. “Metal 3D printing in construction: a review of methods research, applications, opportunities and challenges.” Engineering Structures, vol. 180, pp. 332-348, Feb. 2019.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] J. M. Chacon, M. A. Caminero, E. Garcia-Plaza, P. J. Nunez. “Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection.” Materials and Design, vol. 124, pp. 143-157, Jun. 2017.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] P. Dobrzaniecki, M. Kalita. „Possibility of using the neodymium magnets in machines and equipment clutches”, Mining Machines, vol. 4, pp. 27-38, Dec. 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] S. Ford, T. Minshall. “Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education.” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 25, pp. 131-150, Jan. 2019.10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] A.W. Gebisa, H. G. Lemu. “Influence of 3D Printing FDM Process Parameters on Tensile Property of ULTEM 9085.”, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 30, pp. 331-338, Jan. 2019.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.047
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] A. Gisario, M. Kazarian, F. Martina, M. Mehrpouya. “Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: A review.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 53, pp. 124-149, Oct. 2019.10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] T.W. Kerekes, H. Lim, W. Y. Joe, G. J. Yun. “Characterization of process-deformation/damage property relationship for fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D-printed specimens.” Additive Manufacturing vol. 25, pp. 532-544, Dec. 201810.1016/j.addma.2018.11.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] K.G. Mostafa, C. Montemagno, A.J. Qureshi. “Strength to cost ratio analysis of FDM Nylon 12 3D Printed Parts.” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 26, pp. 753-762, 2018.10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.086
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T. Nguyen, D. Hui. “Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges.” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 43, pp. 172-196, Jun. 2018.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] D. Prostański. “Dust control with use of air-water spraying system.” Archives of Mining Sciences, vol. 57(4), pp. 975-990, Dec. 2012.10.2478/v10267-012-0065-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Y. Qian et al. “A Review of 3D Printing Technology for Medical Applications.” Engineering, vol. 4(5), pp. 729-742, Oct. 2018.10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] N. Shahrubudin, T.C. Lee, R. Ramlan. “An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications.” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 35, pp. 1286-1296, 2019.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] A. Sheoran, H.Kumar. “Fused Deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: Review and reflection on present research.” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 21, pp. 1659-1672. Dec. 2019.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] M. Siegmund, D. Bałaga, M. Kalita. „Testing the parameters of spraying stream form fine-drops nozzles”. Mining Machines, vol. 3 pp. 3-13, Sep. 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] S. Singh, S. Ramakrishna, R. Singh. “Material issues in additive manufacturing; a review.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 25, pp. 185-200, Dec. 2016.10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] M. Snopczyński, J. Kotliński, I. Musiałek. “Testing of mechanical properties of materials used in FDM technology.” Mechanik, vol. 4, pp. 285-287, Apr. 2019.10.17814/mechanik.2019.4.37
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] M. Upadhyay, T. Sivarupan, M.E. Mansori. “3D printing for rapid sand casting – A review.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 29, pp. 211-220, Oct. 2017.10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.07.017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] P. Wang, B. Zou, H. Xiao, S. Ding, C. Huang. “Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modelling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 271, pp. 62-74, Sep. 2019.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Design with Use of 3D Printing Technology

Abstract

Paradigm

My account