Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Same same, but different…? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice Cover

Same same, but different…? The emergence of Public Sector Innovation Labs in theory and practice

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.10.1093/jopart/mum032
  2. Berg, L. N., Thomas, E., Iakovleva, T., Pinheiro, R., & Benneworth, P. (2022). Universities and Regions: New Insights and Emerging Developments. In Universities and Regional Engagement. Routledge.10.4324/9781003150299-14
  3. Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317-335, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222.10.1177/0969776418787222
  4. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’and’Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234.
  5. Chesbrough, H., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Open Social Innovation. In New Frontiers in Open Innovation.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0009
  6. Cole, L. (2021). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. Policy Design and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619.10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619
  7. Document search – Web of Science Core Collection. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 June 2022, from https://www-webofscience-com.proxy-ub.rug.nl/wos/woscc/basic-search.
  8. EIS-RIS 2021 | Research and Innovation. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard/eis#.
  9. Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390.10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390
  10. Global Innovation Index | Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. (n.d.). Global Innovation Index. Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/Home.
  11. Gomes, L. A. de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009.10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
  12. Hansen, A., & Fuglsang, L. (2020). A living lab logic for public sector innovation: The case of European living labs. The 5th Innovation in Public Services and Public Policy Conference.
  13. Janssen, M., Konopnicki, D., Snowdon, J. L., & Ojo, A. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2.10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2
  14. Kaletka, C., Markmann, M., & Pelka, B. (2016). Peeling the Onion. An Exploration of the Layers of Social Innovation Ecosystems. Modelling a context sensitive perspective on driving and hindering factors for social innovation. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), Article 2. https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/42.
  15. Lepik, K.-L., & Urmanavičienė, A. (2022). The Role of Higher Education Institutions in Development of Social Entrepreneurship: The Case of Tallinn University Social Entrepreneurship Study Program, Estonia. In C. Păunescu, K.-L. Lepik, & N. Spencer (Eds.), Social Innovation in Higher Education: Landscape, Practices, and Opportunities (pp. 129–151). Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_7.10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_7
  16. Litmaps. (n.d.). Litmaps. Retrieved 10 May 2022, from https://app.litmaps.com.
  17. McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-018-9315-7.10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
  18. McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 23(2), 297-316, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946.10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946
  19. Meister Broekema, P., Horlings, L. G., & Bulder, E. (2021a). Tackling societal challenges together Co-creation strategies and social innovation in EU policy and funded projects. European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1133.10.1002/epa2.1133
  20. Meister Broekema, P., Horlings, L. G., & Bulder, E. A. M. (2021b). Understanding the value of co-creation for social innovation interpretations of social innovation and co-creation in European policy-related documents between 1995 and 2018. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1909464.10.1080/13511610.2021.1909464
  21. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  22. Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2021). The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00804-y.10.1007/s13132-021-00804-y
  23. Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  24. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (n.d.). Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Retrieved 13 May 2022, from https://oecd-opsi.org/.
  25. OECD. (2016). Public sector innovation. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-12-en.10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-12-en
  26. Oeij, P. R. A., Torre, W. van der, Vaas, S., & Dhondt, S. (2018). Understanding Social Innovation as an innovation process. TNO, /report-completed-understanding-social-innovation-as-an-innovation-process/.
  27. Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public Sector Innovation Research: What’s Next? Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122.10.5172/impp.12.2.122
  28. Rădulescu, M. A., Leendertse, W., & Arts, J. (2022). Living Labs: A Creative and Collaborative Planning Approach. In A. Franklin (Ed.), Co-Creativity and Engaged Scholarship: Transformative Methods in Social Sustainability Research (pp. 457-491). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84248-2_15.10.1007/978-3-030-84248-2_15
  29. Reichert, D. S. (n.d.). The Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. 108.
  30. Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), 831-848, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19826085.10.1177/0308518X19826085
  31. Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2017). Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 7-14, https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045.10.22215/timreview/1045
  32. SHIINE - Multi Disciplinary Innovation for Social Change. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 May 2022, from https://socialchangelab.eu/.
  33. Torvinen, H., & Jansson, K. (2022). Public health care innovation lab tackling the barriers of public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 0(0), 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2029107.10.1080/14719037.2022.2029107
  34. Transitions Performance Index (TPI). (n.d.). [Text]. European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making/support-national-research-and-innovation-policy-making/transitions-performance-index-tpi_en.
  35. Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance-The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. Sustainability, 11(21), 6103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103.10.3390/su11216103
  36. Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
  37. Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290-299, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920.10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2069-8887 | Journal ISSN: 1842-0206
Language: English
Page range: 344 - 363
Published on: Nov 1, 2022
Published by: Society for Business Excellence
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Peter Meister Broekema, Elisabeth A. M. Bulder, Lummina G. Horlings, published by Society for Business Excellence
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.