Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for classifying and prioritizing healthcare quality attributes

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Adebanjo, D., Laosirihongthong, T., Samaranayake, P. (2016), Prioritizing Lean Supply Chain Management Initiatives in Healthcare Service Operations: A Fuzzy AHP Approach, Production Planning & Control, 27(12), 953-966.10.1080/09537287.2016.1164909
  2. Alroaia, Y., and Ardekani, M. (2012). Representing a combination algorithm (AHP and Kano) in order to priority effective factors on customer needs in e-banking: The case of Bank-e-Saderat of Tehran Province. African Journal of Business Management, 6(26), 7727-7735.
  3. Amiri, M. P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6218-6224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
  4. Bayraktaroglu, G., and Özgen, Ö. (2008). Integrating the Kano Model, AHP and planning matrix: QFD application in library services. Library Management, 29 (4/5), 327-351, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120810869110.10.1108/01435120810869110
  5. Belton V., Stewart T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
  6. Bellman, R. E., and Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141-164.10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
  7. Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., Dumouchel, W., Pouliot, F., Richter, R., RubinofF, A., Shen, D., Timko, M. and Walden, D. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), 1-36.
  8. Birader, T.G., Öztüren, A. (2019). Motivators and Perceptions of Island Residents towards Medical Tourism in Mainland. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(19): 164-176. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v10i19.9910.29036/jots.v10i19.99
  9. Boender C. G. E., de Graan J. G., Lootsma F. A. (1989). Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29(2), 133-143.10.1016/0165-0114(89)90187-5
  10. Buckley J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
  11. Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33 (2-3), 259-280, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03081070310001633581.10.1080/03081070310001633581
  12. Chen, C. H. (2019). A new multi-criteria assessment Model combining GRA techniques with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy based TOPSIS method for sustainable building materials supplier selection. Sustainability, 11, 2265.10.3390/su11082265
  13. Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
  14. Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kilinç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
  15. Dima, A. & Vasilache, S. (2016).Trends in the internationalization of European higher education in a convergence perspective. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society,11(2) 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2016-0008.10.1515/mmcks-2016-0008
  16. Dinulescu, R., Bugheanu, A.M. (2020). Improving users’ satisfaction by implementing the analytic hierarchy process in the public transportation system. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 29(6), 957-968.10.30638/eemj.2020.090
  17. Dobrin, D., Dinulescu, R. (2019). Integrating the Quality Function Deployment to the Romanian Healthcare System as part of a Continuous Improvement Process. Proceedings of the 34th IBIMA Conference, Madrid, Spain.
  18. Dos Santos, P.H., Neves, S.M., Sant’anna, D., DE oliveira, C.H., DE Carvalho, H.D., Ornaghi, D., Anna, S. (2019). The analytical hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 212(1), 119-138.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270
  19. Dožić, S., Kalić, M. (2018). Aircraft type selection problem: application of different MCDM Methods. Advanced Concepts, Methodologies and Technologies for Transportation and Logistics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 156–175, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_7.10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_7
  20. Fong, D. (1996). Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results. Center for Quality of Management Journal, 5(3), 21-23.
  21. Gavurova, B., & Kubak, M. (2021). The importance of evaluating inpatients? satisfaction with emphasis on the aspect of confidence. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(3), 821–848. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.027.10.24136/oc.2021.027
  22. GE, Y., Xiao, M., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., HU, Z., Feng, D. (2017). An integrated logarithmic fuzzy preference programming-based methodology for optimum maintenance strategies selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 60: 591-601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.021.10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.021
  23. Ghorbanzadeh, O., Moslem, S., Blaschke, T., Duleba, S. (2019). Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Considering Different Stakeholder Groups by an Interval-AHP Decision Support Model. Sustainability, 11(1), 9-17.10.3390/su11010009
  24. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Ebadi Torkayesh, A., Ecer, F., Turskis, Z., & Šaparauskas, J. (2021). International market selection: a MABA based EDAS analysis framework. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.005.10.24136/oc.2021.005
  25. Hauser, D., Tadikamalla, P. (1996). The analytic hierarchy process in an uncertain environment: A simulation approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 91(1), 27-37.10.1016/0377-2217(95)00002-X
  26. Heidenberger, K., Stummer, C. (1999). Research and development project selection and resource allocation: A review of quantitative Modeling approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 197-224.10.1111/1468-2370.00012
  27. Hejaili, F.F., Assad, L., Shaheen, F.A., Moussa, D.H., Karkar, A., Alrukhaimi, M., Barhamein, M., Kano, N., Seraku, K., Takahaski, F. and Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control), 14(2), 39-48.
  28. Hemati, M., & Ghorbanian, F. (2011). A hybrid Kano-fuzzy AHP method for measuring customer satisfaction: A case study of transportation system. Management Science Letters, 1, 263-270.10.5267/j.msl.2010.04.003
  29. Ho, W., MA, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399-414.10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007
  30. Hsu, Y. L., Hsu, C. C., & Bing, P. C. (2007). Capturing passengers’ voices: The application of Kano’s Model in the airline industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Logistics, Shipping and Port Management, 1-14, Taiyuan.
  31. Janovská, K., Vozňáková, I., Besta, P., & Šafránek, M. (2021). Ecological and economic multicriteria optimization of operating alternative propulsion vehicles within the city of Ostrava in the Czech Republic. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(4), 907–943. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.034.10.24136/eq.2021.034
  32. Krejčí, J., Pavlačka, O., Talašová, J. (2017). A fuzzy extension of analytic hierarchy process based on the constrained fuzzy arithmetic, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 16 (1): 89-110.10.1007/s10700-016-9241-0
  33. Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241.10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
  34. Lee, A., Chen, W., & Chang, C. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 96-107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022.10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
  35. Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102-113.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00118-6
  36. Liberatore, M. J., Nydick, R.L. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 194-207.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
  37. Lloyd, R. (2004). Quality Health care: A Guide to Developing and Using Indicators, Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Inc.
  38. Lustigová, Z., Jarolímková, L, Žufan, J. (2021). Evaluation of Tourist Decision-Making Process by Eye-Tracking Method – Focused on Methodology Gap and Cross-National Comparison. Journal of Tourism and Services, 22(12), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.29036/jots.v12i22.25810.29036/jots.v12i22.258
  39. Mark D. (2001). Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(7/8), 872-894.
  40. Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s Model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25-38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2.10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2
  41. Medjoudj, R., Laifa, A., Aissani, D. (2015). Decision Making on Power Customer Satisfaction and Enterprise Profitability Analysis Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17): 4793-4805.
  42. Mikulić, J., and Prebežac, D. (2011). A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano Model. Managing Service Quality, 21(1), 46-66.10.1108/09604521111100243
  43. Momani, A., Al-hawari, T., AL-Shebami, H., Al-Araidah, O. (2014). Classifying and Ranking Healthcare Quality Attributes Using Integrated Kano-Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Model. Engineering Management Research, 3(1), 68-88.10.5539/emr.v3n1p68
  44. Muerza, V., DE Arcocha, D., Larrode, E., Moreno-jiménez, J.M. (2014). The Multicriteria Selection of Products in Technological Diversification Strategies: An Application to the Spanish Automotive Industry Based on AHP. Production Planning and Control, 25(1): 715-728.
  45. Nascimento, V., Leal, J.E. (2020). Performance criteria for Liquid Bulk Storage Terminals (LBST), using AHP. Operations Management for Social Good, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 421-429.10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_41
  46. Nunes, G.S., Leal, J.E. (2020). Decision-Making Method for Facility Location for Offshore Logistic Operation Based on AHP. Operations Management for Social Good, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 721-729.10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_71
  47. Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 365-381.10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
  48. Robinson, C. (2009). Kano on customers. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 32(2), 23-25.
  49. Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2021). Multi-dimensional analysis of regional investment attractiveness in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 103–138. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.004;
  50. Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804
  51. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. (1991). Prediction, Projection and Forecasting, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-015-7952-0
  52. Salo, A. A., Hämäläinen, R. P. (1995). Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 458-475.10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0224-L
  53. Sireli, Y., Kauffmann, P., & Ozan, E. (2007). Integration of Kano’s Model into QFD for Multiple Product Design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 380-390, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893990.10.1109/TEM.2007.893990
  54. Skvarciany, V., Lapinskaite, I., & Volskyte, G. (2021). Circular economy as assistance for sustainable development in OECD countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.001.10.24136/oc.2021.001
  55. Tong, L., Pu, Z., Ma, J. (2019). Maintenance supplier evaluation and selection for safe and sustainable production in the chemical industry: A case study. Sustainability, 11, 1533.10.3390/su11061533
  56. Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of intelligent systems, 25(6), 529-539.10.1002/int.20418
  57. Vahidnia, M., Alesheikh, A., & Alimohammadi, A. (2009). Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3048-3056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010.10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010
  58. Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1-29.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
  59. Vavrek, R., & Kovářová, E. (2021). Assessment of the social exclusion at the regional level using multi-criteria approach: evidence from the Czech Republic. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.003.10.24136/eq.2021.003
  60. Wind, Y., Saaty, T.L. (1980). Marketing applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 26(7), 641-658.10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641
  61. Xie, Q., Ni, J.-Q., SU, Z. (2017). Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of multiple environmental factors for swine building assessment and control. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 340: 463-471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.024.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.024
  62. Xu, Z. S., & Chen, J. (2007). An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Information Science, 177(1), 248-263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.001.10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.001
  63. Yuhua, L., Kai S. (2004). On the comprehensive evaluation of urban public transport based on gray clustering method. Journal of Harbin University, 9(6), 76-82.
  64. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  65. Zaim, S., Turkyilmaz, A., Acar, M.F., AL-turki, U. and Demirel, O.F. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18(1), 16-29.10.1108/13552511211226166
  66. Zielke, S. (2008). Exploring asymmetric effects in the formation of retail price satisfaction, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(5), 335-347, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.08.005.10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.08.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2069-8887 | Journal ISSN: 1842-0206
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 40
Published on: Apr 10, 2022
Published by: Society for Business Excellence
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2022 Ruxandra Dinulescu, Cosmin Dobrin, published by Society for Business Excellence
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.