Have a personal or library account? Click to login
SPECIFIC ASPECTS IN SEISMIC DESIGN OF TALL REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS Cover

SPECIFIC ASPECTS IN SEISMIC DESIGN OF TALL REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

By: Adrian Zăvoianu and  Radu Pascu  
Open Access
|Dec 2013

References

  1. [1] TBI Guidelines Working Group. (2010). Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Berkeley: University of California (PEER Report No. 2010/05).
  2. [2] Applied Technology Council. (2010). Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council (PEER/ATC Report No. 72-1).
  3. [3] Applied Technology Council. (2010). Proceedings of workshop on tall building seismic design and analysis issues. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council (ATC Report No. 72).
  4. [4] Lin XC, Lu XZ, Miao ZW, Ye LP, Yu YQ, Shen L. (2009). Finite element analysis and engineeringapplication of RC core-tube structures based on the multi-layer shell elements. China Civil EngineeringJournal, 42(3), 49-54. Retrived 21 October 2013 from: http://www.oriprobe.com/journals/tmgcxb.html.
  5. [5] Miao ZW, Ye LP, Wu YH, Ma QL, Lou Y, Lu XZ. (2009). Seismic performances and failure mode analysis ofhybrid frame-core tube structures. Building Structure, 39(04), 1-6.
  6. [6] Powell, G. (2006). Nonlinear dynamic analysis capabilities and limitation. The Structural Design of Tall andSpecial Buildings, 15, 547-552. DOI: 10.1002/tal.381.10.1002/tal.381
  7. [7] Moehle, J.P. (2005). Nonlinear analysis of performance-based earthquake engineering. The Structural designof Tall and Special Buildings, 14, 385-400. DOI: 10.1002/tal.33410.1002/tal.334
  8. [8] Moehle, J.P. (2007). The tall buildings initiative for alternative seismic design. The Structural Design of Talland Special Buildings, 16, 559-567. DOI: 10.1002/tal.435.10.1002/tal.435
  9. [9] Stewart P., Tileylioglu S. (2007). Input ground motions for tall buildings with subterranean levels. TheStructural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16, 543-557. DOI: 10.1002/tal.429.10.1002/tal.429
  10. [10]Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale şi Adminstraţiei Publice. (2013). Cod de proiectare seismică, Partea I, Prevederi de proiectare pentru clădiri, Indicativ P100-1/2013. Bucureşti: Monitorul Oficial al României.
  11. [11] Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale şi Adminstraţiei Publice. (2013). Cod de proiectare a construcţiilor cu pereţi structurali de beton armat, Indicativ CR2-1-1.1:2013. Bucureşti: Monitorul Oficial al României.
  12. [12] Cusson D., Paultre P. (1994). High-strength concrete columns confined by rectangular ties. ASCE Journal ofStructural Engineering, 120(3), 783-804. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(783).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(783)
  13. [13] FEMA. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.Washington, D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  14. [14] European Committee for Standardization. (2006). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Strengthening and repair of buildings. Brussels.
  15. [15] Taranath, S.T. (2010). Reinforced concrete design of tall buildings. New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
  16. [16] Taranath, S.T. (1997). Wind and Earthquake resistant buildings structural analysis and design. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 54
Published on: Dec 31, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2013 Adrian Zăvoianu, Radu Pascu, published by Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 9 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)