Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Analysis of Compliance and Cost–Benefit Performance of Air Pollution Mitigation in Mining Cover

Comparative Analysis of Compliance and Cost–Benefit Performance of Air Pollution Mitigation in Mining

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Wu Y., van Rooij B., 2021 Compliance Dynamism: Capturing the Polynormative and Situational Nature of Business Responses to Law, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 168, pp. 579–591, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04234-4
  2. Ngwu T.A., Oramah C.P., Somprasong K., Charoentanaworakun C., 2025 Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Environmental Protection Plans in quarrying using the Social Return on Investment framework, Pollutants, vol. 5, 42, https://doi.org/10.3390/pollutants5040042
  3. Emerson K., Baldwin E., Scott T.A., Pidot J.R., Lien A.M., Currim F., Bethard S., Ram S., Miller M.L., López-Hoffman L., 2022 Toward NEPA performance: A framework for assessing EIAs, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 97, 106879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106879
  4. Butler T., 2011 Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 6–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.006
  5. Mazur E., 2010 Outcome Performance Measures of Environmental Compliance Assurance: Current Practices, Constraints and Ways Forward, OECD Environment Working Papers, no. 18, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmd9j75cf44-en
  6. Lee S.-T., Jung S.-M., 2025 Social return on investment as a tool for environmental impact and strategic assessments: evidence from South Korea, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 112, 107765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107765
  7. Vazquez-Brust D.A., Plaza-Úbeda J.A., 2021 What Characteristics Do the Firms Have That Go Beyond Compliance with Regulation in Environmental Protection?, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, 1873, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041873
  8. Attavanich W., 2021 Willingness to Pay for Air Quality in Thailand: An Analysis of Multiple Pollutants, Research Paper No. 15/2021, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Available online:, https://kukr.lib.ku.ac.th/kukr_es/BKN/search_detail/result/424865
  9. Ngwu T.A., Somprasong K., 2026 Evaluating the equity–efficiency trade-off in mining environmental interventions using compliance, economic and social metrics, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 120, 108488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108488
  10. Cordes J., 2017 Using cost-benefit analysis and social return on investment to evaluate the impact of social enterprise: Promises, implementation, and limitations, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 64, pp. 98–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.008
  11. Lopez M., Adams M., Walker T., 2024 Cost-benefits analysis of noise abatement measures in the port of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 24, 101057, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101057
  12. Sköld P., Bergion V., Lindhe A., Keucken A., Rosén L., 2022 Risk-Based Evaluation of Improvements in Drinking Water Treatment Using Cost-Benefit Analysis, Water, vol. 14, no. 5, 782, https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050782
  13. National Environmental Board, 2004 Collection of Environmental Quality Standards under the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Royal Thai Government, Bangkok, Available online:, https://www.pcd.go.th/laws/2819/
  14. Phaihong S., Sriket C., 2018 The relationship between mixing height and particulate matter less than 10 μm (PM₁₀) from climate change in nine provinces in Northern Thailand, Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 10, pp. 20–32
  15. Kiesewetter G., Klimont Z., Ru M., Slater J., 2023 National assessment of the cost of inaction of tackling air pollution in Thailand, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and United Nations Environment Programme, Available online:, https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/18826/1/Cost-of-Inaction-Thailand.pdf
  16. Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), 2015 Country profile: Thailand, Available online:, https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/country_profile/THA
  17. Wambwa D., Mundike J., Chirambo B., 2023 Environmental Protection Fund audits in Zambia: A strategy for ensuring regulatory compliance in Zambia’s mining sector, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 16, 101353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101353
  18. Mo L., Liu J., Chen J., 2020 Quantifying ecosystem services of dominate forests in the Beijing Mountain area, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 27, pp. 27773–27785, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09013-7
  19. Ngwu T.A., 2026 Economic valuation of PM10 emission reduction strategies in mining: A case study of a limestone quarry in Thailand, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 15, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18924061
  20. Jones N., Begley A., Malesios C., Svajda J., McGinlay J., Dimitrakopoulos P.G., 2023 Exploring the spatial distribution of social impacts in protected areas, Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 11, 1229437, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1229437
  21. Wu R., Gesang D., Zhou G., Li Y., 2024 Spatial disparities and dynamic evolution of professional public health resource supply level in Beijing, China, BMC Public Health, vol. 24, 2524, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19905-9
  22. Rodrigue M., Magnan M., Cho C.H., 2013 Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 114, pp. 107–129, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1331-5
  23. Moffat K., Zhang A., 2014 The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining, Resources Policy, vol. 39, pp. 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.003
  24. Hermann B.G., Kroeze C., Jawjit W., 2007 Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 15, pp. 1787–1796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.004
  25. Farouk A.M., Radzi A.R., Romali N.S., Farouk M., Elgamal M., Hassan R., Omer M.M., Rahman R.A., 2024 Performance indicators for assessing environmental management plan implementation in water projects, Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 8, 3146, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083146
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/minrv-2026-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2247-8590 | Journal ISSN: 1220-2053
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 85
Submitted on: Mar 6, 2026
Accepted on: May 5, 2026
Published on: Sep 28, 2026
Published by: University of Petrosani
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Tochukwu A. Ngwu, Jeremiah Onaolapo, Chinwe P. Oramah, Kenechukwu R. Ngwu, Thankgod Ugwuada, published by University of Petrosani
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.