References
- Apostolopoulou, E & Liodaki, D 2021, ‘The right to public space during the COVID-19 pandemic: A tale of rising inequality and authoritarianism in Athens, Greece’, City, vol. 25, no. 5–6, pp.764–784.
- Arora, P 2015, ‘Usurping public leisure space for protest: Social activism in the digital and material commons’, Space and Culture, vol. 18, no, 1, pp. 55–68.
- Auyero, J 2003, ‘The geography of popular contention: An urban protest in Argentina’, Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, vol. 28, no. 55–56, pp. 37–70.
- Bennett, L & Layard, A 2016, ‘Legal geography: Becoming spatial detectives’, Geography Compass, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 406–422.
- Bräuchler, B 2019, ‘Brokerage, creativity and space: Protest culture in Indonesia’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 451–468.
- Butler, J 2015, Notes toward a performative theory of assembly, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
- Candea, M 2011, ‘“Our Division of the Universe” making a space for the non–political in the anthropology of politics’, Current Anthropology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp.309–334.
- Casquete, J 2006, ‘The power of demonstrations’, Social Movement Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–60.
- Chandhoke, N 1993, ‘On the social organization of urban space: Subversions and appropriations’, Social Scientist, vol. 21, no. 5–6, pp. 63–73.
- Crossa, V 2013, ‘Play for protest, protest for play: Artisan and vendors’ resistance to displacement in Mexico City’, Antipode, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 826–843.
- De la Llata, S 2016, ‘Open–ended urbanisms: Space–making processes in the protest encampment of the Indignados movement in Barcelona’, Urban Design International, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 113–130.
- De la Llata, S 2021, ‘Spaces of becoming: lessons for planners from the square movements’, Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 90–107.
- Delaney, D 2008, Territory: a short introduction, John Wiley & Sons, London.
- Della Porta, D & Fabbri, M 2016, ‘Producing space in action. The protest campaign against the construction of the Dal Molin military base’, Social Movement Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 180–196.
- Domaradzka, A & Wijkström, F 2019, ‘Urban challengers weaving their networks: between the ‘right to housing’ and the ‘right to the city’’, Housing Studies, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1612–1634.
- Dufour, P 2021, ‘Comparing collective actions beyond national contexts: ‘local spaces of protest’ and the added value of critical geography’, Social Movement Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 224–242.
- Earl, J 2012, ‘Private protest? Public and private engagement online’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, no.4, pp. 591–608.
- Ford, G & Zogran, M 2017, ‘8 Ways We Can Improve the Design of Our Streets for Protest’ 14 Jun 2017. ArchDaily. Available from: <
https://www.archdaily.com/873608/8–ways–we–can–improve–the–design–of–our–streets–for–protest >. [3 February 2021]. - Ghaziani, A 2021, ‘People, protest and place: Advancing research on the emplacement of LGBTQ+ urban activisms’, Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1529–1540.
- Gough, P 2000, ‘From heroes’ groves to parks of peace: Landscapes of remembrance, protest and peace’, Landscape Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 213–228.
- Gould, RV 1995, Insurgent identities: Class, community, and protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Hardt, M & Negri, A. 2005, Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire, Penguin, New York.
- Hatuka, T 2020, ‘Alternating narratives: The dynamic between public spaces, protests, and meanings’ in Companion to Public Space, eds V Mehta & D Palazzo, Routledge, London, pp. 358–365.
- Heinonen, P 2019, ‘Constructing autonomy: the significance of architecture in creating and manifesting autonomy in protest camps’, Social Movement Studies, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 647–666.
- Imig, D 2002, ‘Contestation in the streets: European protest and the emerging Euro–polity’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 914–933.
- Johnston, H & Noakes, JA (eds.). 2005, Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective, Rowman & Littlefield, London.
- Keith, M & Pile, S (eds.) 2013, Geographies of resistance, Routledge, London.
- Kretschmann, A 2023, ‘The rubber brick’s story: A cultural sociology of policing protest in Europe’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 233–257.
- Kwok, C & Chan, NK 2020, ‘The making of contentious political space: The transformation of Hong Kong’s Victoria Park’, Space and Culture, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 615–632.
- Lehtovuori, P 2016, Experience and conflict: The production of urban space, Routledge, London.
- Loukaitou-Sideris, A 1996, ‘Cracks in the city: Addressing the constraints and potentials of urban design’, Journal of Urban Design, vo. 1, no. 1, pp. 91–103.
- Manzini, E 2016, ‘Design culture and dialogic design’, Design Issues, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 52–59.
- Martin, G 2021, ‘Protest, policing and law during COVID–19: On the legality of mass gatherings in a health crisis’, Alternative Law Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 275–281.
- McAdam, D, Tarrow, S & Tilly, C 2003, ‘Dynamics of contention’, Social Movement Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 99–102.
- McFarlane, C 2020, ‘The force of density: political crowding and the city’, Urban Geography, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1310–1317.
- Mela, A 2014, ‘Urban public space between fragmentation, control and conflict’, City, Territory and Architecture, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
- Melgaço, L & Monaghan J (eds) 2018, Protests in the information age: Social movements, digital practices and surveillance, Routledge, London.
- Merwood–Salisbury, J 2019, Design for the crowd: patriotism and protest in Union Square, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Mitchell, D 2003, The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space, Guilford Press, New York.
- Mitchell, D & Staeheli, LA 2005, ‘Permitting protest: Parsing the fine geography of dissent in America’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 796–813.
- Mitchell, WJT, Harcourt, BE & Taussig, M 2013, Occupy: Three inquiries in disobedience. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Mualam, NY & Max, D 2021, ‘Do social protests affect housing and land–use policies? The case of the Israeli social protests of 2011 and their impact on statutory reforms’, Housing Studies, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1465–1496.
- Parkinson, J 2012, Democracy and public space: The physical sites of democratic performance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Rafail, P 2018, ‘Protest in the city: Urban spatial restructuring and dissent in New York, 1960–2006’, Urban Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 244–260.
- Rosenthal, A 2000, ‘Spectacle, fear, and protest: A guide to the history of urban public space in Latin America’, Social Science History, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 33–73.
- Mowatt, RA 2021, The geographies of threat and the production of violence: The state and the city between us, Routledge, London.
- Rucht, D 2007. ‘On the sociology of protest marches’ in The Street as Stage: Protest marches and public rallies since the nineteenth century, ed. M Reiss, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Sassen, S 2011, ‘The global street: Making the political’, Globalizations, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 573–579.
- Sbicca, J & Perdue, RT 2014. ‘Protest through presence: Spatial citizenship and identity formation in contestations of neoliberal crises’, Social Movement Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 309–327.
- Schwedler, J 2020, ‘Material obstacles to protest in the urban built environment: Insights from Jordan’, Contention, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 70–92.
- Thorpe, A 2014, ‘Applying protest event analysis to architecture and design, Social Movement Studies’, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 275–295.
- Van Woerkum, C, Aarts, N & Van Herzele, A 2011, ‘Changed planning for planned and unplanned change’, Planning Theory, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 144–160.
- Vienne, V 2014, ‘Preserving a place for protest in Paris’ 14 Oct 2014, ArchDaily. Available from: <
https://www.archdaily.com/557185/preserving–a–place–for–protest–in–paris >. [3 February 2021]. - Young, A 2021, Femininity in dissent, Routledge, London.
- Zajko, M & Béland, D 2008, ‘Space and protest policing at international summits’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 719–735.