Figure 1

Figure 2
![(a) Basic parameters of low-flows using the example of episodes from 1994–1995 on the Dunajec river (Nowy Targ-Kowaniec water-gauging station); and (b) a graphical illustration of the estimation of Relative Drought Streamflow Deficit (RSD). Tn – low-flow duration, Vn – drought streamflow deficit volume of the low-flow event [m3], Vmax – maximum possible streamflow deficit volume during the low-flow event, i.e. when the discharge value equals 0 [m3], Q70% – flow corresponding to the seventieth percentile of the flow duration curveSource: own elaboration and Tomaszewski 2012 (changed)](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647247b3215d2f6c89dc2bb2/j_mgrsd-2022-0002_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKKYHRIQIM%2F20260310%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260310T080457Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEHUaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQD1EJNYn%2F%2Fcn%2BaMSIAd8bbGyJyB5rpWsGjtHCnPMxM9fQIhAOcxcEafL4ElZo0GgYz1AmDImPGN9z10abAetzoT9nI3Kr0FCD4QAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgx8JQVXEQiHwK4%2F%2BMYqmgWU1IdilL7OYGoqxagDlOYn8%2Bo9ieFeFVOoB4yp3DgmG%2FOdI0D5LpSTnmEvT9JJEn3V48oqu9AjNsKJWa0KTJEjLnlw8B7ygQpzOFR55lFxi3LijPhpveYVnkLOoKNuHDALiyIy%2FNbQHjJU0SOIYD%2B0M6fgUgtH1UU5LhIcFYM8NfceQa5BdYyY8HAECSrQHGcjTfDR%2BAuieEr7LtrH6J%2FiIopJsff05a80qRhD29Idk2AmJYMrsQuFZtNH9330MgUjZup60HNB8%2Bvn6yNOL0VkNOvEeWXAil%2BLoF7RSNc0%2Ft1MTnu2JiToPmvy%2BQ%2Fu%2BpTJDVGTk4ILbtN1gze01%2B5bqqcs2cd4opZvOp734HnogdmdlnygVjbHvOYqP9EM2Y%2FEvVAoRG1VjsXMtH0abUTObi6ZeNbmUzpffM%2FT0go%2FtPuTaO%2BcWePEOkGHlUEeOHVRwJeje%2FNG6vrreLFz0sGbRLHV7L2NRtGOmf4KykxlXYT7SH0TJoWINgWEVgutAtXafrbiyGwRwtpE%2Fh5Gn9aKn%2FVtC2mSkDiT97aKKyWfoMMfP0DDLYUudUAyR8fvK38UepBCrE%2FIu%2BERxqoOW3Cb0SP24OW6fLOuF%2F0aBbLH08iCoTt9HHmghjorAqMX%2F9iofy70YTT8VsG70CpbW2bccZ9h0jVu6n66684qgzFzCULo56tW7PO9%2BVYgtYf0TfMdu0C81g62mU5Galn2J05cRJ1U6uX344VwXA3ow78TNh7ZnDrtyAEy%2FawObMFS7eZkpJ5JEBMOXBg7%2B2HQbCjm9Cp7pdBXUno7IM5Qf1GjLUr3%2FTItZh8UhTDuNpPm5pzrQXJQWWoYQpR9XUpz8iU%2BP9ibOg%2Fd1KvoJWDW18NXnGI8mR2zTxKnt98w172%2BzQY6sAHepdvIlar7M5H0aOaxoST%2FeUT8FNPjlP8YbgXQdd9%2B6%2F7sOJlUAhNJRugAN1WKR2cMhU2vdLb1zaa8L7EZ7l36MoJAD%2F1Oy3UTh8uzE2FFvWGTeHFn93Ua0hnfRLbOgr8cCfR3Ajjq0xG1ob0jaXP4cAfmxwnup4YHNqw7eNhIKQao7RgX6T8riBZgxm7BJuzIpwqMqE%2BmJEsV845ub3dlQyX7KqcnApPfoIXr2kp8ag%3D%3D&X-Amz-Signature=7a4b9b5b3e224d82a3da0b732c2b4283c991b773061e3d7dd5fdc0670ea95902&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Characteristics of hydrological droughts in the upper Dunajec river catchment (1989–2018)
| No. | Period | Dt [days] | DSI [%] | DRI [%] | DCI | DDPC [%] | cv(DDPC) | DCnI [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01.11.1988–21.03.1989 | 141 | 32.88 | 96.79 | 0.48 | 13.44 | 1.02 | 58.19 |
| 2 | 14.10.1989–04.04.1990 | 173 | 22.68 | 91.17 | 0.64 | 41.41 | 0.32 | 37.33 |
| 3 | 05.06.1990–02.09.1990 | 90 | 17.32 | 94.55 | 0.67 | 72.94 | 0.30 | 32.87 |
| 4 | 15.12.1990–17.05.1991 | 154 | 26.63 | 96.79 | 0.59 | 30.66 | 0.57 | 44.50 |
| 5 | 08.06.1991–01.08.1991 | 55 | 15.18 | 13.16 | 0.76 | 52.12 | 0.39 | 11.77 |
| 6 | 27.11.1991–25.03.1992 | 120 | 24.63 | 93.93 | 0.49 | 45.09 | 0.46 | 45.92 |
| 7 | 06.06.1992–17.10.1992 | 134 | 25.88 | 96.79 | 0.59 | 63.94 | 0.13 | 44.27 |
| 8 | 11.12.1992–26.03.1994 | 471 | 23.29 | 90.84 | 0.34 | 65.11 | 0.41 | 45.14 |
| 9 | 27.06.1994–20.04.1995 | 298 | 23.40 | 96.79 | 0.54 | 50.28 | 0.52 | 45.18 |
| 10 | 23.07.1995–22.04.1996 | 275 | 27.87 | 100.00 | 0.43 | 63.49 | 0.37 | 62.80 |
| 11 | 10.11.1996–29.04.1997 | 171 | 15.70 | 100.00 | 0.47 | 41.96 | 0.35 | 59.18 |
| 12 | 17.09.1997–15.11.1997 | 60 | 27.60 | 100.00 | 0.59 | 73.57 | 0.12 | 12.25 |
| 13 | 30.07.1998–28.09.1998 | 61 | 9.95 | 97.75 | 0.37 | 63.39 | 0.32 | 52.79 |
| 14 | 19.11.1998–01.04.1999 | 134 | 27.00 | 95.79 | 0.37 | 41.09 | 0.51 | 55.71 |
| 15 | 31.07.1999–29.03.2000 | 243 | 24.32 | 98.18 | 0.59 | 57.40 | 0.40 | 37.80 |
| 16 | 19.08.2000–17.03.2001 | 212 | 24.04 | 100.00 | 0.41 | 69.86 | 0.22 | 61.82 |
| 17 | 06.10.2001–19.03.2002 | 165 | 24.48 | 100.00 | 0.55 | 48.09 | 0.42 | 52.39 |
| 18 | 19.04.2002–26.05.2002 | 38 | 8.81 | 24.05 | 0.43 | 52.63 | 0.57 | 11.32 |
| 19 | 07.12.2002–18.04.2003 | 133 | 34.06 | 100.00 | 0.40 | 58.05 | 0.15 | 63.61 |
| 20 | 31.05.2003–17.03.2004 | 292 | 26.80 | 100.00 | 0.39 | 63.36 | 0.28 | 65.62 |
| 21 | 22.08.2004–04.04.2005 | 227 | 17.63 | 100.00 | 0.52 | 67.67 | 0.32 | 47.16 |
| 22 | 02.09.2005–02.04.2006 | 213 | 26.21 | 100.00 | 0.31 | 61.83 | 0.33 | 79.48 |
| 23 | 11.07.2006–04.09.2007 | 421 | 22.26 | 100.00 | 0.71 | 40.94 | 0.67 | 34.81 |
| 24 | 14.12.2007–10.04.2008 | 119 | 20.97 | 86.62 | 0.55 | 38.18 | 0.60 | 26.43 |
| 25 | 12.05.2008–20.09.2008 | 132 | 15.33 | 92.18 | 0.73 | 49.38 | 0.55 | 24.73 |
| 26 | 19.10.2008–28.03.2009 | 161 | 15.28 | 98.18 | 0.55 | 39.07 | 0.62 | 36.86 |
| 27 | 08.09.2009–22.10.2009 | 45 | 15.11 | 86.61 | 0.45 | 56.35 | 0.21 | 35.78 |
| 28 | 03.01.2010–22.03.2010 | 79 | 13.99 | 98.83 | 0.43 | 63.56 | 0.35 | 47.66 |
| 29 | 15.10.2010–06.04.2011 | 174 | 17.46 | 92.68 | 0.52 | 66.26 | 0.43 | 26.81 |
| 30 | 29.08.2011–05.04.2012 | 220 | 31.05 | 100.00 | 0.37 | 64.66 | 0.29 | 72.39 |
| 31 | 29.06.2012–13.04.2013 | 289 | 25.64 | 100.00 | 0.47 | 43.67 | 0.40 | 55.40 |
| 32 | 23.07.2013–07.04.2014 | 259 | 17.61 | 100.00 | 0.63 | 35.81 | 0.68 | 33.28 |
| 33 | 03.11.2014–27.03.2015 | 145 | 19.50 | 88.65 | 0.59 | 48.55 | 0.45 | 29.48 |
| 34 | 23.06.2015–16.11.2015 | 147 | 25.14 | 98.30 | 0.50 | 48.23 | 0.27 | 51.53 |
| 35 | 15.12.2015–03.05.2016 | 141 | 20.90 | 98.30 | 0.57 | 24.23 | 0.35 | 35.32 |
| 36 | 07.06.2016–16.07.2016 | 40 | 9.66 | 31.41 | 0.67 | 76.07 | 0.21 | 19.88 |
| 37 | 29.12.2016–23.03.2017 | 85 | 11.95 | 78.82 | 0.59 | 50.37 | 0.22 | 38.35 |
| 38 | 21.06.2017–02.09.2017 | 74 | 14.19 | 88.01 | 0.76 | 71.52 | 0.27 | 23.99 |
| 39 | 30.12.2017–31.03.2018 | 92 | 23.26 | 68.72 | 0.66 | 66.30 | 0.06 | 29.67 |
| 40 | 29.04.2018–13.07.2018 | 76 | 15.27 | 8.21 | 0.51 | 58.88 | 0.58 | 5.99 |
| 41 | 23.08.2018–31.10.2018 | 70 | 14.01 | 83.93 | 0.58 | 77.45 | 0.20 | 33.71 |
Selected characteristics of the investigated catchments (1989–2018)
| No. | River - water-gauge | A [km2]* | avgH* [m asl.] | Q70% [m3/s] | q70% [dm3/s/km2] | ALq [dm3/s/km2] | AAq [dm3/s/km2] | AHq [dm3/s/km2] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Czarny Dunajec - Koniówka | 134 | 1443.04 | 1.96 | 14.62 | 10.24 | 32.10 | 84.74 |
| 2 | Dunajec – Nowy Targ | 431.8 | 1370.38 | 3.95 | 9.15 | 6.52 | 20.26 | 53.37 |
| 3 | Dunajec – Nowy Targ-Kowaniec | 681.1 | 1367.85 | 7.16 | 10.51 | 7.72 | 21.75 | 53.09 |
| 4 | Dunajec – Sromowce Wyżne | 1278.3 | 1486.53 | 14.3 | 11.19 | 8.58 | 21.93 | 55.01 |
| 5 | Dunajec – Krościenko | 1580.3 | 1457.98 | 16.4 | 10.38 | 7.88 | 20.87 | 53.44 |
| 6 | Dunajec – Gołkowice | 2046.9 | 1407.70 | 19.5 | 9.53 | 7.43 | 19.39 | 49.76 |
| 7 | Dunajec – Nowy Sącz | 4341 | 1388.99 | 34 | 7.83 | 6.01 | 15.58 | 38.41 |
| 8 | Kościeliski Stream – Kościelisko-Kiry | 34.5 | 1540.25 | 0.82 | 23.77 | 15.88 | 51.50 | 134.31 |
| 9 | Lepietnica – Ludźmierz | 50.7 | 898.42 | 0.4 | 7.89 | 5.52 | 19.58 | 53.18 |
| 10 | Wielki Rogoźnik – Ludźmierz | 124.3 | 811.04 | 0.76 | 6.11 | 4.22 | 14.86 | 37.65 |
| 11 | Biały Dunajec – Zakopane-Harenda | 58.4 | 1385.29 | 1.12 | 19,18 | 13.51 | 42.04 | 110.78 |
| 12 | Biały Dunajec – Szaflary | 210.1 | 1313.51 | 2.8 | 13,33 | 9.88 | 26.09 | 61.27 |
| 13 | Poroniec – Poronin | 78.8 | 1360.62 | 0.73 | 9.26 | 6.63 | 13.02 | 53.96 |
| 14 | Białka – Łysa Polana | 63.1 | 1733.43 | 1.06 | 16.8 | 10.76 | 52.21 | 143.48 |
| 15 | Białka – Trybsz 2 | 202.3 | 1569.16 | 3.06 | 15.13 | 10.31 | 37.85 | 101.45 |
| 16 | Niedziczanka – Niedzica | 136.4 | 769.00 | 0.74 | 5.43 | 3.40 | 15.27 | 42.07 |
| 17 | Grajcarek – Szczawnica | 73.6 | 868.10 | 0.54 | 7.34 | 5.36 | 16.92 | 43.16 |
| 18 | Ochotnica – Tylmanowa | 107.6 | 840.73 | 0.76 | 7.06 | 5.21 | 15.55 | 37.84 |
| 19 | Poprad – Muszyna-Milik | 1695.1 | 779.74 | 9.72 | 5.73 | 4.43 | 12.55 | 30.98 |
| 20 | Poprad – Stary Sącz | 2071 | 707.99 | 11.9 | 5.74 | 4.39 | 12.49 | 30.42 |
Parameters for linear trend equations in the series of selected spatial hydrological drought characteristics for the upper Dunajec river catchment (1989–2018) (significance of trends at level α=0_05)
| Dt | DRI | DSI | DDPC | DCnI | DCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | −1.59 | −0.39 | −0.20 | 0.25 | −0.35 | 0.001 |
| R2 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| p (t-Student test) | 0.225 | 0.216 | 0.018 | 0.207 | 0.123 | 0.375 |
| p (Mann-Kendall test) | 0.185 | 0.296 | 0.010 | 0.301 | 0.111 | 0.345 |