References
- Brewer, CA & Campbell, AJ 1998, ‘Beyond graduated circles: Varied point symbols for representing quantitative data on maps’, Cartographic Perspectives, vol. 29, pp. 6–25.
- Carr, D 1991, ‘Looking at large data sets using binned data plots’ in Computing graphics in statistics, eds A Buja & P Tukey, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 7–39.
- Carr, D, Olson, A & White, D 1992, ‘Hexagon mosaic maps for display of univariate and bivariate geographical data’, Cartography and GIS, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 228–236.
- Carstensen, LW 1982. ‘A continuous shading scheme for two-variable mapping’, Cartographica, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 53–70.
- Carstensen, LW 1984, ‘Perceptions of the variable similarity of bivariate choroplethic maps’, The Cartographic Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 23–29.
- Carstensen, LW 1986a, ‘Hypothesis testing using univariate and bivariate choroplethic maps’, The American Cartographer, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 231–251.
- Carstensen, L 1986b, ‘Bivariate choropleth mapping: The effects of axis scaling’, The American Cartographer vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27–42.
- Cuff, DJ, Pawling, JW & Blair ET 1984, ‘Nested value-by-area cartograms for symbolizing land use and other proportions’, Cartographica, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–8.
- Dahlberg, R. 1981. Educational needs and problems within the national cartographic system. The American Cartographer, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 105–114.
- Dent, BD, Torguson JS & Hodler TW, 2009, Cartography: thematic map design, 6th edn, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Elmer, ME 2013, ‘Symbol considerations for bivariate thematic maps’, in Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference (ICC). International Cartographic Association: Dresden. Available from: <
http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2013/_extendedAbstract/278_proceeding.pdf > [08 June 2021] - Eyton, JR 1984, ‘Complementary-color in two-variable maps’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 477–90.
- Fabrikant, SI, Rebich-Hespanha, S, Andrienko, N, Andrienko, G & Montello DR 2008, ‘Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes’, The Cartographic Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 201–215.
- Gershon, N 1998, ‘Visualization of an imperfect world’, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 18, no. 4, pp.43–45.
- Huber, S, Sieber, R, Ruegsegger, M & Hurni, L 2007, ‘Multivariate mapping in high quality atlases’, in Proceedings of the 23th International Cartographic Conference (ICC). International Cartographic Association: Moscow, pp. 1–10.
- Kiik, A, Nyström, M. & Harrie, L 2017. ‘Cartographic design matters – a comparison of thematic polygon design’, The Cartographic Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 24–35.
- Korycka-Skorupa, J & Nowacki, T 2019, ‘Cartographic presentation – from simple to complex map’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 16–22.
- Kraak, MJ, Roth, RE, Ricker, B, Kagawa, A, Le Sourd, G 2020, Mapping for a Sustainable World. The United Nations: New York.
- Lavin, S & Archer JC 1984, ‘Computer-produced unclassed bivariate choropleth maps’, The American Cartographer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–57.
- Leonowicz, A 2006, ‘Two-variable choropleth maps as a useful tool for visualization of geographical relationship’, Geografija, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 33–37.
- Nelson, ES 1999, ‘Using selective attention theory to design bivariate point symbols’, Cartographic Perspectives, vol. 32, pp. 6–28.
- Nelson, ES 2000a ‘Designing effective bivariate symbols: the influence of perceptual grouping processes’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 261–278.
- Nelson, ES 2000b ‘The impact of bivariate symbol design on task performance in a map setting’, Cartographica, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 61–78.
- Nelson, J 2020, ‘Multivariate mapping’ in The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge, ed. John P. Wilson. Available from: <
https://gistbok.ucgis.org/bok-topics/multivariate-mapping > [15 June 2021]. - Olson, JM 1981, ‘Spectrally encoded two-variable maps’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 259–276.
- Šašinka, Č, Stachoň, Z, Kubíček, P, Tamm, S, Matas, A & Kukaňová, M 2019, ‘The impact of global/local bias on task-solving in map-related tasks employing extrinsic and intrinsic visualization of risk uncertainty maps’, The Cartographic Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 175–191.
- Šašinka, Č, Stachoň, Z, Čeněk, J, Šašinková, A, Popelka, S, Ugwitz P & Lacko, D 2021, ‘A comparison of the performance on extrinsic and intrinsic cartographic visualizations through correctness, response time and cognitive processing’, PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 4.
- Slocum, A 1981, ‘Analyzing the communicative efficiency of two-sectored pie graphs’, Cartographica, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 53–65.
- Strode, G, Mesev, V, Bleisch, S, Ziewitz, K, Reed, F, & Morgan, JD 2020, ‘Exploratory bivariate and multivariate geovisualizations of a social vulnerability index’, Cartographic Perspectives, vol. 95, pp. 5–23.
- Tufte, E 1990, Envisioning information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.
- Wainer, H & Francolini, C 1980, ‘An empirical inquiry concerning human understanding of two-variable color maps’, The American Statistician, vol. 34, pp. 81–93.