Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Striving for a restitution of the former splendor? Reasons for municipal splits in Poland

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Alesina, A & Spolaore, E 2003, The size of Nations, MIT Press.
  2. Baldersheim, H & Rose, L 2010, Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders, Palgrave-Macmillan, London.
  3. Brink, A 2004, ‘The break-up of municipalities: Voting behavior in local referenda’, Economics of Governance, vol. 5, no.2, pp. 119–135.
  4. Chojnicki, Z & Czyż, T 2000, ‘Nowa organizacja terytorialna Polski i układ regionalny’ [‘New Polish territorial organization and regional system’], Czasopismo Geograficzne, vol. LXXI, no. 3–4, pp. 261–277.
  5. Drew, J & Dollery, B 2014, ‘Separation anxiety: an empirical evaluation of the Australian Sunshine Coast Regional Council de-amalgamation’, Public Money & Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 213–220.
  6. Erlingsson, GO 2005, ‘Modelling secessions from municipalities’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 141–159.
  7. Firman, T 2013, ‘Territorial splits (Pemekaran Daerah) in decentralising Indonesia, 2000–2012: Local development drivers or hindrance?’, Space and Polity, vol. 17(2), pp. 180–196.
  8. Fox, W & Gurley, T 2006, ‘Will consolidation improve sub-national governments?’, Policy Research Working Paper, vol. 3913, World Bank, Washington.
  9. Gendźwiłł, A, Kurniewicz, A & Swianiewicz, P 2020, ‘The impact of municipal territorial reforms on the economic performance of local governments. A systematic review of quasi-experimental studies’, Space and Polity, DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2020.1747420
  10. Hinnerich, BT 2009, ‘Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform?’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 93(5–6), pp. 721–728.
  11. Hogen-Esch, T 2001, ‘Urban secession and the politics of growth: The case of Los Angeles’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 36, pp. 783–810.
  12. Illner, M 2010, ‘Top-down or bottom up? Coping with territorial fragmentation in the Czech Republic’ in Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders, eds. H Baldersheim & L Rose, Palgrave-Macmillan, London, pp. 214–233.
  13. Izdebski, H 2009, Samorząd terytorialny. Podstawy ustroju i działalności [Local government. Foundations of system and activities], LexisNexis, Warszawa.
  14. Jałowiecki, B (ed) 1995, Funkcjonowanie miast i gmin zespolonych [Operation of a merged cities and municipalities], report prepared at the request of Prime Minister's Office.
  15. Jarczewski, W 2002, Odzyskana niezależność. Przyczyny i skutki powstania nowych gmin na obrzeżach GOP w latach 90. [Regained independence. Causes and effects of the creation of new municipalities on the outskirts of Upper Silesian Industrial District in the 1990s], Wydawnictwo Dante, Kraków.
  16. Kaczmarek, T 2005, Struktury terytorialno-administracyjne i ich reformy w krajach europejskich [Territorial administrative structures and their reforms in European countries], Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
  17. Kaczmarek, T 2016, ‘Gminny podział administracyjny w świetle 25 lat funkcjonowania samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce’ [The municipal administrative division in the light of 25 years of local government in Poland], Przegląd Politologiczny, vol. 1, no.21, pp. 63–80.
  18. Kiełczewska-Zaleska, M 1974, ‘Dotychczasowy rozwój lokalnej sieci osadniczej a reforma administracyjna wsi z 1973. Na przykładzie powiatów gorlickiego i żuromińskiego’ [‘The current development of the local settlement network and the local administrative reform from 1973. On the example of the Gorlice and Żuromin counties’], Przegląd Geograficzny, vol. XLVI, no. 2, pp. 205–229.
  19. Ladd, H 1994, ‘Fiscal impacts of local population growth: A conceptual and empirical analysis’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 24(1), pp. 661–686.
  20. Lima, RCA & Neto, RMS 2018, ‘Secession of municipalities and economies of scale: Evidence from Brazil’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 58(1), pp. 159–180.
  21. Main Statistical Office 2020. Available from: https://stat.gov.pl/ and https://eteryt.stat.gov.pl/eteryt/raporty/WebRaportZestawienie.aspx. [20 August 2020].
  22. Ministry of Finance 2020. Available from: https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse/budzety-jst and https://mf-arch2.mf.gov.pl/web/bip/ministerstwo-finansow/dzialalnosc/finanse-publiczne. [20 August 2020].
  23. Ministry of Interior and Administration 2020. Available from: https://www.gov.pl/web/mswia and https://archiwumbip.mswia.gov.pl/. [20 August 2020].
  24. Miszczuk, A 2003, Regionalizacja administracyjna III Rzeczpospolitej. Koncepcje teoretyczne a rzeczywistość [Administrative regionalization of the Republic of Poland. Theoretical concepts and reality], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin.
  25. Nelson, M 1992, ‘Municipal amalgamation and the growth of the local public sector in Sweden’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 32(1), pp. 39–53.
  26. Ocena sytuacji samorządów lokalnych [Assessment of the local government situation] 2013, Ministerstwo Administracji i Cyfryzacji, Warszawa.
  27. Statistic Poland 2020, Local Data Bank. Available from: <https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/podgrup/temat>. [20 August 2020].
  28. Swianiewicz, P 2014, Ocena podziału terytorialnego państwa z uwzględnieniem efektywności funkcjonowania urzędów organów jednostek samorządu terytorialnego –wnioski i rekomendacje [Assessment of the territorial division of the state, including the effectiveness of the offices of local government units - conclusions and recommendations], report prepared at the request of Ministry of Digitization and Administration, Warsaw.
  29. Swianiewicz, P 2018, ‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? - ten years later’, Local Government Studies, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
  30. Swianiewicz, P 2021, ‘From post-communist democratic laissez-faire to prevention of territorial fragmentation: tightening the rules of municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990’, Miscellanea Geographica - Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–17.
  31. Swianiewicz, P & Łukomska, J 2019, ‘Is small beautiful? The quasi-experimental analysis of the impact of territorial fragmentation on costs in Polish local governments’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 832–855.
  32. Swianiewicz, P, Gendźwiłł, A & Łukomska, J 2018, ‘Inicjatorzy i opuszczeni: demokracja lokalna po gminnych rozwodach’ [‘The initiators and the abandoned: local democracy after municipal ‘divorces’’], Prace Geograficzne, no. 154, pp. 7–33.
  33. Swianiewicz, P, Gendźwiłł, A & Zardi, A 2017, Territorial reforms in Europe: Does size matters. Territorial amalgamation Toolkit, Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  34. Swianiewicz, P, Gendźwiłł, A, Łukomska, J & Kurniewicz, A 2016, Rozmiar gmin i powiatów a sprawność ich funkcjonowania. Wielkoludy i liliputy [The size of municipalities and counties and the efficiency of their functioning. Giants and lilliputs], Wydawmictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
  35. Tanguay, GA & Wihry, DF 2008, ‘Voters’ preferences regarding municipal consolidation: evidence from the Quebec de-merger referenda’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 325–345.
  36. Wollmann, H 2010, ‘Territorial consolidation reforms in German East Landers’ in Territorial consolidation reforms in Europe, ed. P Swianiewicz, LGI-Open Society Institute, Budapest.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0047 | Journal eISSN: 2084-6118 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6046
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 81
Submitted on: May 19, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 10, 2020
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
Published by: University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2021 Julita Łukomska, published by University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.