From post-communist democratic laissez-faire to prevention of territorial fragmentation: tightening the rules of municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990

Swianiewicz, Paweł

doi:10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0046

Abstract

The article discusses municipal boundary changes in Central and Eastern Europe, concentrating on the heavily under-researched phenomenon of municipal splits. The first part describes the basic facts of municipal secessions in the region analysed. The second part presents a model explaining the national and municipal level factors behind the variation in the occurrence of successful split initiatives. It distinguishes between national institutional settings, economic, identity (cultural) and local political factors.

References

Bačlija, I & Lavtar, R 2021, ‘Factors contributing to the municipal splits in Slovenia’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54–61.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baldersheim, H & Rose, L 2010, Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders, Palgrave-Macmillan, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brink, A 2004. ‘The break-up of municipalities: Voting behavior in local referenda’, Economics of Governance, vol. 5(2), pp. 119–135.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dobos, G 2021. ‘Municipal splits and hidden amalgamations in Hungary’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dollery, B, Kortt, M & Grant, B 2011, ‘A normative model for local government de-amalgamation in Australia’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 46(4), pp. 601–615.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drew, J & Dollery, B 2014, ‘Separation anxiety: an empirical evaluation of the Australian Sunshine Coast Regional Council de-amalgamation’, Public Money & Management, vol. 34(3), pp. 213–220.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drew, J, Razin, E & Andrews, R 2019, ‘Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis’, Local Government Studies, vol. 45(5), pp. 748–767.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ebinger, F, Kuhlmann, S & Bogumil, J 2019, ‘Territorial reforms in Europe: effects on administrative performance and democratic participation’, Local Government Studies, vol. 45(1), pp. 1–23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Egner, B, Gendźwiłł, A, Pleschbereger, W & Swianiewicz, P 2018, ‘Mayors and Political Parties’ in Political leaders and changing local democracy: the European Mayor, eds H Heinelt, A Magnier, M Cabria & H Reynaert, Palgrave-Macmillan, London, pp. 327–358.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Erlingsson, GO 2005. ‘Modelling secessions from municipalities’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 28(2), pp. 141–159.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Erlingsson, G, Ödalen, J & Wångmar, E 2015, ‘Understanding large-scale institutional change: Social conflicts and the politics of Swedish municipal amalgamations, 1952–1974’, Scandinavian Journal of History, vol. 40(2), pp. 195–214.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fox, WF & Gurley, T 2006, ‘Will consolidation improve sub-national governments?’, Policy Research Working Paper, vol. 3913, The World Bank, Washington.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gendźwiłł, A, Kurniewicz, A & Swianiewicz, P 2020, ‘The impact of municipal territorial reforms on economic performance of local governments: systematic review of quasi-experimental studies’, Space and Polity. Available from: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13562576.2020.1747420>. [20 April 2020].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hansen, SW 2015, ‘The democratic costs of size: how increasing size affects citizen satisfaction with local government’, Political Studies, vol. 63, pp. 373–389.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Illner, M 2010, ‘Top-down or bottom up? Coping with territorial fragmentation in the Czech Republic’ in Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders, eds H Baldersheim & L Rose, Palgrave-Macmillan, London, pp. 214–233.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ladner, A, Keuffler, N, Baldersheim, H, Hlepas, N, Swianiewicz, P, Steyvers, K & Navarro, C 2019, Patterns of local autonomy in Europe, Macmillan, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lapointe, S 2018, ‘Love thy neighbor? The effect of income and language differences on votes for municipal secessions’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 70, pp. 229–245.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lima, RC, de Andradem Neto, R & da Mota Sileira 2018, ‘Secession of municipalities and economies of scale: evidence from Brazil’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 58, pp. 159–180.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Łukomska, J 2021, ‘Striving for a restitution of the former splendour? Reasons for municipal splits in Poland’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 71–81.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maisonobe M, Grossetti M, Milard B, Jégou L & Eckert D 2017, ‘The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process (1999–2011)’, Scientometrics, vol. 113(1), pp. 479–493.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marcou, G 1993. ‘New tendencies of Local Government Development in Europe’ in Local Government in the New Europe, ed. R Bennett, Belhaven Press, London, pp. 51–66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McDonnell, J 2019, ‘Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: a systematic review’, Local Government Studies, vol. 46(3), pp. 331–350.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Musilová, K & Heřmánek, J 2015, ‘Factors of Voluntary Mergers of Municipalities: a case study of the Czech Republic’, Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 15(4), pp. 294–318.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ostrom, V, Tiebout, C & Warren, R 1961, ‘The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry’, American Political Science Review, vol. 55(4), pp. 831–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Skarica, M 2021, ‘The process of local government fragmentation in Croatia: from a bong bang to a status quo’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 46–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soos, G 2006, Local party institutionalization in Hungary, Ph.D. dissertation, Central European University, Budapest.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stanuş, C 2021, ‘Territorial fragmentation in post-communist Romania: the not so curious case of a de-amalgamation reform’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 62–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swianiewicz, P 2010, Territorial reforms in Europe, LGI-Open Society Institute, Budapest.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swianiewicz, P 2018, ‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? - ten years later’, Local Government Studies, vol. 44(1), pp. 1–10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swianiewicz, P, Łukomska, J 2019, ‘Is small beautiful? The quasi-experimental analysis of the impact of territorial fragmentation on costs in Polish local governments’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 55(3), pp. 832–855.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swianiewicz, P, Gendźwiłł, A & Łukomska, J 2018, ‘Inicjatorzy i opuszczeni: demokracja lokalna po gminnych rozwodach’ [The initiators and the abandoned: local democracy after municipal “divorces”], Prace Geograficzne, vol. 154, pp. 7–33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swianiewicz, P & Mielczarek, A 2005, ‘Parties and political culture in Central and Eastern European Local Governments’ in Faces of Local Democracy: Comparative Papers from Central and Eastern Europe, eds G Soos & V Zentai, Open Society Institute, Budapest, pp. 13–78.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tanguay, GA, Wihry, DF 2008, ‘Voters’ preferences regarding municipal consolidation: evidence from the Quebec de-merger referenda’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 30(3), pp. 325–345.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tavares, AF 2018, ‘Municipal amalgamations and their effects: A literature review’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 22(1), pp. 5–15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

From post-communist democratic laissez-faire to prevention of territorial fragmentation: tightening the rules of municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990

Abstract

Paradigm

My account