Defining daily urban systems from individual everyday behaviour: A time-geographic perspective on census commuting flows and mobile phone location data
By: Pavel Klapka and Marián Halás
References
- Ahas, R., Aasa, A., Silm, S., Aunap, R., Kalle, H., & Mark, Ü. (2007). Mobile positioning in space–time behaviour studies: social positioning method experiments in Estonia. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304007782382918
- Ahas, R., Silm, S., Järv, O., Saluveer, E., & Tiru, M. (2010). Using mobile positioning data to model locations meaningful to users of mobile phones. Journal of Urban Technology, 17(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630731003597306
- An, L., Tsou, M. H., Crook, S. E., Chun, Y., Spitzberg, B., Gawron, J. M., & Gupta, D. K. (2015). Space–time analysis: Concepts, quantitative methods, and future directions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105, 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510
- Axhausen, K. W. (2007). Activity spaces, biographies, social networks and their welfare gains and externalities: Some hypotheses and empirical results. Mobilities, 2, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100601106203
- Berry, B. J. L. (1968). A synthesis of formal and functional regions using general field theory of spatial behavior. In B. J. L. Berry, & D. F. Marble (Eds.), Spatial analysis: a reader in statistical geography (pp. 419–428). Prentice Hall.
- Berry, B. J. L. (1970). The geography of the United States in the year 2000. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 51, 21–53.
- Berry, B. J. L. (1973). Growth centres in the American urban system. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
- Casado-Díaz, J. M., & Coombes, M. (2011). The delineation of 21st century local labour markets areas: A critical review and a research agenda. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Espańoles, 57, 7–32.
- Coombes, M. (2010). Defining labour market areas by analysing commuting data: innovative methods in the 2007 review of Travel-to-Work Areas. In Stillwell, J., Duke-Williams, O., & Dennett, A. (Eds.), Technologies for migration and commuting analysis: spatial interaction data applications (pp. 227–241). IGI Global.
- Coombes, M. G., Dixon, J. S., Goddard, J. B., Openshaw, S., & Taylor, P. J. (1979). Daily urban systems in Britain: from theory to practice. Environment and Planning A, 11, 565–574.
- Cörvers, F., Hensen, M., & Bongaerts, D. (2009). Delimitation and coherence of functional and administrative regions. Regional Studies, 43, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654103
- Couclelis, H., & Golledge, R. (1983). Analytic research, positivism, and behavioral geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01420.x
- Couclelis, H., Golledge, R. G., Gale, N., & Tobler, W. (1987). Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(87)80020-8
- de Graaf, E. A. (2019). Daily urban systems explained from the household perspective: An exploratory research on how the spatial interactions of the individual households shape the structure of daily urban systems. European Planning Studies, 27, 106–125.
- Dijst, M. (1999). Two-earner families and their action spaces: A case study of two Dutch communities. GeoJournal, 48, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007031809319
- Doxiadis, C. A. (1968). A city for human development. Ekistics, 25(151), 374–394. Drobne, S. (2017). Functional regions and areas: Literature review according to application fields. Geodetski vestnik, 61, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2015.04.697-708
- Drobne, S., & Lakner, M. (2016). Intramax and other objective functions: The case of Slovenia. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(2), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0007
- Elias, D., & Kuijpers, B. (2020). A note on measuring the volume of space-time prisms and the area of their spatial projections. Transactions in GIS, 24, 1427–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12666
- Elleg˚rd, K. (1999). A time-geographical approach to the study of everyday life of individuals – a challenge of complexity. GeoJournal, 48, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007071407502
- Elleg˚rd, K. (2019). Thinking time geography: Concepts, methods and applications. Routledge.
- Elleg˚rd, K., & Vilhelmson, B. (2004). Home as a pocket of local order. Geografiska Annaler B, 86, 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00168.x
- Farmer, C. J. Q., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2011). Network-based functional regions. Environment and Planning A, 43, 2723–2741. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44136
- Golledge, R. G. (1978). Learning about urban environments. In T. Carlstein, D. N. Parkes, & N. J. Thrift (Eds.), Timing space and spacing time 1: making sense of time (pp. 76–98). Edward Arnold.
- Golledge, R G., & Stimson, R. J. (1997). Spatial behavior: A geographical perspective. The Guilford Press.
- Golledge, R. G., & Timmermans, H. (1990). Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems I: cognition. Progress in Human Geography, 14, 57–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259001400104
- Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24(1), 7–21.
- Hägerstrand, T. (1985). Time-geography. Focus on the corporeality of man, society and environment. In The Science and Praxis of Complexity (pp. 193–216). The United Nations University.
- Halás, M., & Klapka, P. (2021). Revealing the structures of internal migration: A distance and a time-space behaviour perspectives. Applied Geography, 137, 102603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102603
- Halás, M., Klapka, P., Tonev, P., & Bednář, M. (2015). An alternative definition and use for the constraint function for rule-based methods of functional regionalisation. Environment and Planning A, 47, 1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15592306
- Hall, P. (1974). The containment of urban England. The Geographical Journal, 140, 386–408.
- Hall, P., & Hay, D. (1980). Growth centres in the European urban system. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
- Hasanzadeh, K., Heinonen, J., Ala-Mantila, S., Czepkiewicz, M., Kyttä, M., & Ottelin, J. (2019). Beyond geometries of activity spaces. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12, 149–177. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1148
- Karlsson, C., & Olsson, M. (2006). The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications. The Annals of Regional Science, 40, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0019-5
- Kim, K., Dean, D. J., Kim, H., & Chun, Y. (2016). Spatial optimization for regionalization problems with spatial interaction: a heuristic approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30, 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1031671
- Klapka, P., Elleg rd, K., & Frantál, B. (2020). What about Time-Geography in the post-Covid-19 era? Moravian Geographical Reports, 28(4), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0017
- Klapka, P., & Halás, M. (2016). Conceptualising patterns of spatial flows: Five decades of advances in the definition and use of functional regions. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(2), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0006
- Klapka, P., Halás, M., Netrdová, P., & Nosek, V. (2016). The efficiency of areal units in spatial analysis: Assessing the performance of functional and administrative regions. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0010
- Kwan, M. P. (1998). Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30, 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x
- Kwan, M. P. (2004). GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler B, 86, 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00167.x
- Lee, J., & Miller, H. J. (2019). Analyzing collective accessibility using average space-time prisms. Transportation Research Part D, 69, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.004
- Lenntorp, B. (1976). Paths in space-time environments: a time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography B 44. Gleerup.
- Lenntorp, B. (2004). Path, prism, project, pocket and population: an introduction. Geografiska Annaler B, 86, 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00164.x
- Li, R., & Tong, D. (2016). Constructing human activity spaces: A new approach incorporating complex urban activity-travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 56, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.08.013
- Miller, H. J. (1991). Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 5, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799108927856
- Miller, H. J. (2005). A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37(1), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2005.00575.x
- Miller, H. J., & Bridwell, S. A. (2009). A field-based theory for time geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99, 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600802471049
- Mitchell, W., & Watts, M. (2010). Identifying functional regions in Australia using hierarchical aggregation techniques. Geographical Research, 48, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00631.x
- Musil, J., & Müller, J. (2008). Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis, 44, 321–348. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.05
- Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., & Witlox, F. (2011). The prism of everyday life: Towards a new research agenda for time geography. Transport Reviews, 31, 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.484153
- Nowosad, J., & Stepinski, T. F. (2018). Spatial association between regionalizations using the information-theoretical V-measure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32, 2386–2401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1511794
- OECD (2002). Redefining territories. The functional regions. OECD Publications.
- Patterson, Z., & Farber, S. (2015). Potential path areas and activity spaces in application: A review. Transport Reviews, 35, 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1042944
- Poorthuis, A., & Van Meeteren, M. (2021). Containment and connectivity in Dutch urban systems: a network-analytical operationalisation of the three-systems model. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 112, 387–403.
- Pred, A. (1977). The choreography of existence: comments on Hägerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/142726
- Rai, R. K., Balmer, M., Rieser, M., Vaze, V. S., Schönfelder, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2007). Capturing human activity spaces: New geometries. Transportation Research Record, 2021, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/2021-09
- Schönfelder, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2004). On the variability of human activity spaces. In M. Koll-Schretzenmayr, M. Keiner, & G. Nussbaumer (Eds.), The Real and Virtual Worlds of Spatial Planning (pp. 237–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10398-2_17
- Schönfelder, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2010). Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel. Ashgate. Sila-Nowicka, K., Fotheringham, A. S., & Demšar, U. (2023). Activity triangles: a new approach to measure activity spaces. Journal of Geographical Systems, 25, 489–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-023-00414-z
- Sui, D. (2012). Looking through Hägerstrand’s dual vistas: towards a unifying framework for time geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.020
- Šveda, M., Hurbánek, P., Sládeková Madajová, M., Rosina, K., Förstl, F., Záboj, P., & Výbošťok, J. (2024). When spatial interpolation matters: Seeking an appropriate data transformation from the mobile network for population estimates. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 110, 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102106
- Timmermans, H., Arentze, T., & Joh, C. H. (2002). Analysing space-time behaviour: new approaches to old problems. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph363ra
- Van den Berg, L., Drewett, R., Klaassen, L. H., Rossi, A., & Vijverberg, C. H. T. (1982). Urban Europe: A study of growth and decline. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Vich, G., Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2017). Suburban commuting and activity spaces: using smartphone tracking data to understand the spatial extent of travel behaviour. The Geographical Journal, 183(4), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12220
- Wyly, E. K. (2004). Geographies of the United States in the year 2004. The Professional Geographer, 56, 91–95.
- Xi, W., Calder, C. A., & Browning, C. R. (2020). Beyond activity space: Detecting communities in ecological networks. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(6), 1787–1806. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1715779
- Xu, Y., Shaw, S. L., Zhao, Z., Yin, L., Fang, Z., & Li, Q. (2015). Understanding aggregate human mobility patterns using passive mobile phone location data: a home-based approach. Transportation, 42, 625–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9597-y
- Zandvliet, R., & Dijst, M. (2006). Short-term dynamics in the use of places: A space-time typology of visitor populations in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 43, 1159–1176.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 (formerly 1210-8812) | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 161 - 169
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2026
Published online: Oct 11, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Pavel Klapka, Marián Halás, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.