Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The perceived importance of urban design qualities for walkability in Czech city centres: An expert-based assessment Cover

The perceived importance of urban design qualities for walkability in Czech city centres: An expert-based assessment

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Adkins, A., Makarewicz, C., Scanze, M., Ingram, M., & Luhr, G. (2017). Contextualizing walkability: Do relationships between built environments and walking vary by socioeconomic context? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2017.1322527
  2. Appleyard, D. (1980). Livable streets: Protected neighborhoods? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 451(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271628045100111
  3. Appleyard, D., & Lintell, M. (1972). The environmental quality of city streets: The residents' viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38(2), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367208977410
  4. Balsas, C. J. L. (2021). Exciting walk-only precincts in Asia, Europe and North-America. Cities, 112, 103129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103129
  5. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A., Bakogiannis, E., & Nikitas, A. (2023). Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres. Journal of Transport Geography, 111, 103645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103645
  6. Bereitschaft, B. (2017). Equity in microscale urban design and walkability: A photographic survey of six Pittsburgh streetscapes. Sustainability, 9(7), 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071233
  7. Blečić, I., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., & Trunfio, G. A. (2020). Planning and design support tools for walkability: A guide for urban analysts. Sustainability, 12(11), 4405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114405
  8. Bocconcino, M. M., Vozzola, M., & Rabbia, A. (2021). Quality of urban walking routes: Interaction of knowledge systems for integrated representations. In Handbook of Research on Developing Smart Cities Based on Digital Twins (pp. 388–424). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7091-3.ch018
  9. Bosselmann, P. (2018). Kevin Lynch and his legacy on teaching professional planners and designers. Journal of the American Planning Association, 84(3–4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1528172
  10. Bozovic, T. (2025). Urban walkability and equity in the car-centric city. In Inclusive Cities and Global Urban Transformation: Infrastructures, Intersectionalities, and Sustainable Development (pp. 77–85). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7521-7
  11. Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., Amburgey, J. W., & Szalay, C. (2007). Walkable route perceptions and physical features: Converging evidence for en route walking experiences. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506295569
  12. Carmona, M. (2019). Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
  13. Carmona, M. (2021). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158457
  14. Carmona, M. (2022). The existential crisis of traditional shopping streets: The sun model and the place attraction paradigm. Journal of Urban Design, 27(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1951605
  15. Carr, L. J., Dunsiger, S. I., & Marcus, B. H. (2010). Walk score™ as a global estimate of neighborhood walkability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(5), 460–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.007
  16. Cysek-Pawlak, M. M., & Pabich, M. (2021). Walkability – the New Urbanism principle for urban regeneration. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 14(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1834435
  17. Dičiūnaitė-Rauktienė, R., Gurskienė, V., Burinskienė, M., & Maliene, V. (2018). The usage and perception of pedestrian zones in Lithuanian cities: Multiple criteria and comparative analysis. Sustainability, 10(3), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030818
  18. Emerson, R. W. (2023). Kendall's W and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 117(4), 336–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X231188882
  19. Ewing, R. H., Clemente, O., Neckerman, K. M., Purciel-Hill, M., Quinn, J. W., & Rundle, A. (2013). Measuring urban design: Metrics for livable places. Island Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
  20. Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155
  21. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.
  22. Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P. J., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., & Ramos, R. A. (2022). Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(7), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793
  23. Forouhar, A., Chapple, K., Allen, J., Jeong, B., & Greenberg, J. (2025). Assessing downtown recovery rates and determinants in North American cities after the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban Studies, 62(6), 1209–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241270987
  24. Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 20, 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.22
  25. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., & Yamu, C. (2024). A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy. European Planning Studies, 32(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1761947
  26. Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island press.
  27. Golledge, R. G. (2006). Philosophical bases of behavioral research in geography. In S. Aitken, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Approaches to Human Geography (pp. 75–85). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215432.n6
  28. Gössling, S. (2023). Extending the theoretical grounding of mobilities research: transport psychology perspectives. Mobilities, 18(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2092886
  29. Hall, C. M., & Ram, Y. (2018). Walk Score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.018
  30. Hamidi, S., Bonakdar, A., Keshavarzi, G., & Ewing, R. (2020). Do urban design qualities add to property values? An empirical analysis of the relationship between urban design qualities and property values. Cities, 98, 102564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102564
  31. Hamidi, S., & Moazzeni, S. (2019). Examining the relationship between urban design qualities and walking behavior: Empirical evidence from Dallas, TX. Sustainability, 11(10), 2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102720
  32. Hirt, S. (2013). Whatever happened to the (post)socialist city? Cities, 32, S29–S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.010
  33. Hooi, E., & Pojani, D. (2020). Urban design quality and walkability: An audit of suburban high streets in an Australian city. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1554996
  34. Horak, J., Kukuliac, P., Koktava, N., Orlikova, L., & Maresova, P. (2025). Impact of street-level barriers on walking accessibility for persons with declining mobility: Comparison of two cities. Cities, 166, 106220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106220
  35. Huang, X., Zeng, L., Liang, H., Li, D., Yang, X., & Zhang, B. (2024). Comprehensive walkability assessment of urban pedestrian environments using big data and deep learning techniques. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 26993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78041-x
  36. Istrate, A. L., Bosák, V., Nováček, A., & Slach, O. (2020). How attractive for walking are the main streets of a shrinking city? Sustainability, 12(15), 6060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156060
  37. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American Cities. Vintage Books.
  38. Ježek, J. (2019). Revitalizace městských center v ČR: aktéři, problémy, řešení, faktory úspěšnosti. In J. Krbová, & J. Ježek (Eds.), Revitalizace městských center a veřejných prostranství v ČR (pp. 62–80). Wolters Kluwer.
  39. Krajhanzl, J., Chabada, T., Svobodová, R., Kácha, O., Vintr, J., & Becková, A. (2021). České klima 2021: Mapa českého veřejného mínění v oblasti změny klimatu. Katedra environmentálních studií FSS, Masarykova univerzita. Green Dock, z. s. https://enviro.fss.muni.cz/ceskeklima2021
  40. Litman, T. A. (2003). Economic value of walkability. Transportation Research Record, 1828(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-01
  41. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press.
  42. Mack, E. A., Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2017). Walkable Art: An Empirical Investigation of Arts-Related Businesses and Walkable Neighborhoods. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417690804
  43. Matan, A. (2011). Rediscovering urban design through walkability: An assessment of the contribution of Jan Gehl. Doctoral dissertation. Curtin University.
  44. Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism, 1(3), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480
  45. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
  46. Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. B. (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
  47. Natera Orozco, L. G., Deritei, D., Vancso, A., & Vasarhelyi, O. (2019). Quantifying life quality as walkability on urban networks: The case of Budapest. In International conference on complex networks and their applications (pp. 905–918). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.00893
  48. Naughton, L. A. (2022). The walkable neighborhood and public art: Testing a method for objectively measuring a perceptual urban design quality. Master's thesis. Tufts University.
  49. Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2015). Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: Beyond megacities. Sustainability, 7(6), 7784–7805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067784
  50. Poklewski-Koziełł, D., Dudzic-Gyurkovich, K., & Duarte, C. M. (2023). Investigating urban form and walkability measures in the new developments: The case study of Garnizon in Gdañsk. Land Use Policy, 125, 106471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106471
  51. Rišová, K. (2020). Walkability research: Concept, methods and a critical review of post-socialist studies. Geografický časopis, 72(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.31577/geogrcas.2020.72.3.11
  52. Rišová, K., & Sládeková Madajová, M. (2020). Gender differences in a walking environment safety perception: A case study in a small town of Banská Bystrica (Slovakia). Journal of Transport Geography, 85, 102723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102723
  53. Rogers, S. H., Halstead, J. M., & Gardner, K. H. (2011). Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4
  54. Ruiz-Padillo, A., Pasqual, F. M., Uriarte, A. M. L., & Cybis, H. B. B. (2018). Application of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for assessing walkability: A case study in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.07.016
  55. Stanilov, K. (Ed.) (2007). The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3
  56. Strommer, T., Munkácsy, A., & Földes, D. (2025). How walkable is an urban street? An expert-based public space and walkability assessment method. European Transport Studies, 2, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ets.2025.100040
  57. Sýkora, L., & Bouzarovski, S. (2012). Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402
  58. Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2013). The walkable neighborhood: A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 1(1), 42–63.
  59. Talen, E., Choe, K. W., Akcelik, G. N., Berman, M. G., & Meidenbauer, K. L. (2023). Street design preference: An on-line survey. Journal of Urban Design, 28(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2066512
  60. Tsenkova, S., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (Eds.) (2006). The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe: Space, institutions and policy. Springer Science & Business Media.
  61. Turok, I., & Mykhnenko, V. (2007). The trajectories of European cities, 1960–2005. Cities, 24(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.007
  62. Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2023). The remote work revolution: Impact on real estate values and the urban environment: 2023 AREUEA Presidential Address. Real Estate Economics, 51(1), 7–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12422
  63. Wheeler, S. M. (2013). Planning for sustainability: Creating livable, equitable, and ecological communities (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134559
  64. Yoshimura, Y., Kumakoshi, Y., Fan, Y., Milardo, S., Koizumi, H., Santi, P., ..., & Ratti, C. (2022). Street pedestrianization in urban districts: Economic impacts in Spanish cities. Cities, 120, 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103468
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2026-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 119
Submitted on: Nov 12, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2026 Lenka Paszová, Ondřej Slach, Vojtěch Bosák, Alexandr Nováček, Aura-Luciana Istrate, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.