Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Labels of regional integration: The case of naming in polycentric urban regions Cover

Labels of regional integration: The case of naming in polycentric urban regions

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Cardoso, R. V., & Meijers, E. J. (2017). The metropolitan name game: The pathways to place naming shaping metropolitan regions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(3), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16678851
  2. Champion, A. G. (2001). A changing demographic regime and evolving polycentric urban regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations. Urban Studies, 38(4), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035277
  3. Cohen, S. B., & Kliot, N. (1992). Placenames in Israel’s ideological struggle over the administered territories. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82(4), 653–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01722.x
  4. Conedera, M., Vassere, S., Neff, C., Meurer, M., & Krebs, P. (2007). Using toponymy to reconstruct past land use: a case study of ‘brüsáda’(burn) in southern Switzerland. Journal of Historical Geography, 33(4), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2006.11.002
  5. Davoudi, S. (2007). Polycentric development and metropolitan governance. Social Policy and Regional Development, 9.
  6. Derudder, B., Meijers, E., Harrison, J., Hoyler, M., & Liu, X. (2022). Polycentric urban regions: conceptualization, identification and implications. Regional Studies, 56(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1982134
  7. Dieleman, F. M., & Faludi, A. (1998). Polynucleated metropolitan regions in Northwest Europe. European Planning Studies, 6, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319808720468
  8. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  9. Florczyk A., Corbane C., Schiavina M., Pesaresi M., Maffenini L., Melchiorri, M., ..., & Zanchetta L. (2019a). GHS Urban Centre Database 2015, multitemporal and multidimensional attributes, R2019A. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). https://doi.org/10.2905/53473144-B88C-44BC-B4A3-4583ED1F547E
  10. Florczyk, A. J., Melchiorri, M., Corbane, C., Schiavina, M., Maffenini, M., Pesaresi, M., ..., & Zanchetta, L. (2019b). Description of the GHS Urban Centre Database 2015, Public release 2019, Version 1.0. Publications Office. http://doi.org/10.2760/037310
  11. Giraut, F., & Houssay-Holzschuch, M. (2016). Place naming as dispositif: Toward a theoretical framework. Geopolitics, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1134493
  12. Globalization and World Cities (GaWC) Research Network (2020). World Cities 2020. https://gawc.lboro.ac.uk/gawc-worlds/the-world-according-to-gawc/world-cities-2020/
  13. Gnatiuk, O., & Glybovets, V. (2020). Do street status and centrality matter for post-socialist memory policy? The experience of Ukrainian cities. Geographia Polonica, 93(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0167
  14. Google Maps. https://www.google.pl/maps/preview
  15. Granqvist, K., Sarjamo, S., & Mäntysalo, R. (2019). Polycentricity as spatial imaginary: The case of Helsinki City Plan. European Planning Studies, 27(4), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1569596
  16. Hanssens, H., Derudder, B., Van Aelst, S., & Witlox, F. (2014). Assessing the functional polycentricity of the mega-city-region of Central Belgium based on advanced producer service transaction links. Regional Studies, 48(12), 1939–1953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.759650
  17. Harrison, J., Hoyler, M., Derudder, B., Liu, X., & Meijers, E. (2022). Governing polycentric urban regions. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2083011
  18. Lichter, M., & Malý, J. (2023). Compact and polycentric urban forms as intertwined concepts: learning from the impacts of Covid-19 retail restrictions on spatial (in) equalities in Brno (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports, 31, 129–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2023-0012
  19. Light, D., & Young, C. (2015). Toponymy as commodity: Exploring the economic dimensions of urban place names. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12153
  20. Liu, X., Derudder, B., & Wu, K. (2016). Measuring polycentric urban development in China: An intercity transportation network perspective. Regional Studies, 50(8), 1302–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1004535
  21. Liu, X., Derudder, B., & Wang, M. (2018). Polycentric urban development in China: A multi-scale analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), 953–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317690155
  22. Liu, X., Derudder, B., Yu, B., Wu, Q., & Witlox, F. (2023). The impact of cities’ transportation network connections on regional market integration: the case of China’s urban agglomerations. GeoJournal, 88(6), 6539–6559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10984-6
  23. Malý, J., & Mulíček, O. (2016). European territorial cohesion policies: Parallels to socialist central planning? Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0002
  24. Medway, D., & Warnaby, G. (2014). What’s in a name? Place branding and toponymic commodification. Environment and Planning A, 46(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45571
  25. Meijers, E. (2007). Clones or complements? The division of labour between the main cities of the Randstad, the Flemish Diamond and the RheinRuhr Area. Regional Studies, 41(7), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120239
  26. Meijers, E. (2008). Summing small cities does not make a large city: Polycentric urban regions and the provision of cultural, leisure and sports amenities. Urban Studies, 45(11), 2323–2342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008095870
  27. Meijers, E. J., & Burger, M. J. (2010). Spatial structure and productivity in US metropolitan areas. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1383–1402. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42151
  28. Meijers, E. J., & Burger, M. J. (2017). Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’. Urban Studies, 54(1), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597642
  29. Meijers, E., Hoogerbrugge, M., & Cardoso, R. (2018). Beyond polycentricity: Does stronger integration between cities in polycentric urban regions improve performance? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 109(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12292
  30. Myers, G. A. (1996). Naming and placing the other: Power and the urban landscape in Zanzibar. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 87(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1998.tb01553.x
  31. Our World in Data (2024). Data adapted from UN Population Division (via World Bank). https://ourworldindata.org/
  32. Pain, K. (2008). Examining ‘core–periphery’relationships in a global city-region: the case of London and South East England. regional studies, 42(8), 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701808857
  33. Peteet, J. (2013). Words as interventions: naming in the Palestine – Israel conflict. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000322964
  34. Rose-Redwood, R. (2011). Rethinking the agenda of political toponymy Reuben Rose-Redwood. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 10(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v10i1.884
  35. Rose-Redwood, R. (2016). “Reclaim, Rename, Reoccupy”: Decolonizing Place and the Reclaiming of PKOLS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v15i1.1215
  36. Rose-Redwood, R., Alderman, D., & Azaryahu, M. (2010). Geographies of toponymic inscription: new directions in critical placename studies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509351042
  37. Rozenkiewicz, A., & Łach, J. (2012). Problems of the regional nomenclature of the Polish-Czech borderland. Moravian Geographical Reports, 20(3), 69–77.
  38. Sun, T., & Lv, Y. (2020). Employment centers and polycentric spatial development in Chinese cities: A multi-scale analysis. Cities, 99, 102617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102617
  39. Taylor, P. J., Evans, D. M., Hoyler, M., Derudder, B., & Pain, K. (2009a). The UK space economy as practised by advanced producer service firms: Identifying two distinctive polycentric city-regional processes in contemporary Britain. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00857.x
  40. Taylor, P. J., Ni, P., Derudder, B., Hoyler, M., Huang, J., Lu, F., …, & Shen, W. (2009b). Measuring the World City Network: New Developments and Results, GaWC Research Bulletin 300. http://www.lboro.ac.uk, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-051-8.ch002
  41. Tentand, J., & Blair, D. (2011). Motivations for naming: The development of a toponymic typology for Australian placenames. Names, 59(2), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1179/002777311X12976826704000
  42. Tuan, Y. F. (1991). Language and the making of place: A narrative-descriptive approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(4), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01715.x
  43. UNDESA (2018). World Urbanization Prospects The 2018 Revision. United Nations.
  44. Van Houtum, H., & Lagendijk, A. (2001). Contextualising regional identity and imagination in the construction of polycentric urban regions: The cases of the Ruhr area and the Basque country. Urban Studies, 38(4), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035321
  45. Van Meeteren, M. (2022). A prehistory of the polycentric urban region: excavating Dutch applied geography, 1930–60. Regional Studies, 56(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035321
  46. Van Meeteren, M., Poorthuis, A., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2016). Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1278–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015573455
  47. Van Oort, F., Burger, M., & Raspe, O. (2010). On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: Spatial integration, functional integration and economic complementarities within the Dutch Randstad. Urban Studies, 47(4), 725–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009352362
  48. Vandermotten, C., Halbert, L., Roelandts, M., & Cornut, P. (2008). European planning and the polycentric consensus: Wishful thinking? Regional Studies, 42(8), 1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701874206
  49. Veneri, P., & Burgalassi, D. (2012). Questioning polycentric development and its effects. Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS-2 regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 1017–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673566
  50. Wang, M., Derudder, B., & Liu, X. (2019). Polycentric urban development and economic productivity in China: A multiscalar analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(8), 1622–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19866836
  51. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/home
  52. World Population Review. https://worldpopulationreview.com/
  53. Yang, H., Dijst, M., Witte, P., Van Ginkel, H., & Yang, W. (2018). The spatial structure of high speed railways and urban networks in China: A flow approach. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 109(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12269
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2025-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 221 - 234
Submitted on: Mar 16, 2025
|
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2025
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Donata Wysocka-Niemiec, Ben Derudder, Jadwiga Biegańska, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.