Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Natura 2000 sites as a crucial part of nature conservation? An analysis of landscape development in selected areas of the Czech Republic Cover

Natura 2000 sites as a crucial part of nature conservation? An analysis of landscape development in selected areas of the Czech Republic

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Ameztegui, A., Morán-Ordóñez, A., Márquez, A., Blázquez-Casado, Á., Pla, M., Villero, D., ..., & Coll, L. (2021). Forest expansion in mountain protected areas: Trends and consequences for the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 216, 104240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104240
  2. Anderson, E., & Mammides, C. (2020). Changes in land-cover within high nature value farmlands inside and outside Natura 2000 sites in Europe: A preliminary assessment. Ambio, 49, 1958−1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01330-y
  3. Bastian, O. (2013). The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecological Indicators, 24, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016
  4. Bastian, O., Neruda, M., Filipová, L., Machová, I., & Leibenath, M. (2010). Natura 2000 sites as an asset for rural development: the German-Czech Ore Mountains Green network project. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 3(2), 41–58.
  5. Bičík, I., & Jančák, V. (2001). Czech agriculture after 1990. Geografie, 106(4), 209−221.
  6. Concepción, E. D. (2021). Urban sprawl into Natura 2000 network over Europe. Conservation Biology, 35(4), 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13687
  7. Czech National Council (1992). Act No. 114/1992 Call. On Nature conservation and Landscape protection.
  8. Elkie, P. C., Rempel, R. S., & Carr, A. P. (1999). Patch Analyst User´s Manual. A tool for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Northwest Science and Technology Thunder Bay Ontario.
  9. Ellwanger, G., & Reiter, K. (2019). Nature conservation on decommissioned military training areas – German approaches and experiences. Journal for Nature Conservation, 49, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.02.003
  10. ESRI (2020). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.8. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
  11. European Council (1979). Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of the wild birds.
  12. European Council (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
  13. European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, & Sundseth, K. (2015). The EU birds and habitats directives – For nature and people in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/49288
  14. European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment (2021). EU biodiversity strategy for 2030: bringing nature back into our lives. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/677548
  15. European Environmental Agency (2006). Land accounts for Europe 1990–2000. EEA, Copenhagen: Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting.
  16. European Environment Agency (2012). Protected areas in Europe – an overview. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/protected-areas-ineurope-2012
  17. European Environment Agency (2024). Natura 2000 Barometer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/natura-2000-barometer
  18. Feranec, J., Jaffrain, G., Soukup, T., & Hazeu, G. (2010). Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990−2000 using CORINE land cover data. Applied Geography, 30(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.07.003
  19. Fraser, R. H., & Pouliot, I. O. D. (2009). Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada’s national parks. Remote sensing of Environment, 113, 1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.019
  20. Fuchs, R., Herold, M., Verburg, P. H., & Clevers, J. G. P. W. (2013). A highresolution and harmonized model approach for reconstructing and analysing historic land changes in Europe. Biogeosciences, 10, 1543–1559. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1543-2013
  21. Girvetz, E. H., Thorne, J. H., Berry, A. M., & Jaeger, J. A. G. (2008). Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(3–4), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.02.007
  22. Grešlová, P., Laštovička, J., Štych, P., & Kabrda, J. (2023). Land cover flows and land use intensity in the three decades of the post-communist Czechia: Changing trends and driving forces. Anthropocene, 43, 100395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100395
  23. Gruber, B., Evans, D., Henle, K., Bauch, B., Schmeller, D. S., Dziock, F., ..., & Dormann, C. F. (2012). “Mind the gap!” – How well does Natura 2000 cover species of European interest? Nature Conservation, 3, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.3.3732
  24. Guerra, C. A., Rosa, I. M. D., & Pereira, H. M. (2019). Change versus stability: are protected areas particularly pressured by global land cover change? Landscape Ecology, 34, 2779–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00918-4
  25. Havlíček, M., Skokanová, H., Dostál, I., Vymazalová, M., Pavelková, R., & Petrovič, F. (2018). The consequences of establishing military training areas for land use development – A case study from Libavá, Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 73, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.039
  26. Havlíček, M., Vyskočil, A., Caletka, M., Sviták, Z., Dzuráková, M., Skokanová, H., & Šopáková, M. (2022). History of using hydropower in the Moravice river basin, Czechia. Water, 14, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060916
  27. Hermoso, V., Morán-Ordóñez, A., & Brotons, L. (2018). Assessing the role of Natura 2000 at maintaining dynamic landscapes in Europe over the last two decades: implications for conservation. Landscape Ecology, 33, 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0683-3
  28. Hlaváč, V., Chobot, K., Pešout, P., Havlíček, J., Jeřábková, L., Lacina, D., ..., & Strnad, M. (2021). Ochrana biotopu zvláště chráněných druhů v územním plánování. AOPK ČR.
  29. Jaeger, J. A. G. (2000). Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 115–130.
  30. Janík, T., Bičík, I., & Kupková, L. (2022). Transformation of Czech cultural landscapes over the past two centuries: typology based on model areas. Geografie, 127(3), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2022.005
  31. Janík, T., Skokanová, H., Borovec, R., & Romportl, D. (2021). Landscape changes of rural protected landscape areas in Czechia: From arable land to permanent grassland – from old to new unification? Journal of Landscape Ecology, 14, 88–109. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0018
  32. Janík, T., Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Borovec, R., & Romportl, D. (2024). Landscape changes in Czech large protected areas 1950−2020: Two different landscapes types on the same path. Journal for Nature Conservation, 81, 126705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126705
  33. Janík, T., Zýka, V., Borovec, R., Demková, K., & Romportl, D. (2020). Změny krajinného pokryvu ve vybraných chráněných územích Ústeckého kraje: trendy a typologie. Studia Oecologica, 14(1), 3–11.
  34. Jepsen, M. R., Kuemmerle, T., Müller, D., Erb, K., Verburg, P. H., Haberl, H., ..., & Reenberg, A. (2015). Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy, 49, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003
  35. Kallimanis, A. S., Touloumis, K., Tzanopoulos, J., Mazaris, A. D., Apostolopoulou, E., Stefanidou, S., ..., & Pantis, J. D. (2015). Vegetation coverage change in the EU: patterns inside and outside Natura 2000 protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0837-9
  36. Kenig-Witkowska, M. M. (2017). Natura 2000 – The European Union mechanism for nature conservation: some legal issues. Journal of comparative Urban Law and Policy, 2(1), 198–217.
  37. Kovac, M., Hladnik, D., & Kutnar, L. (2018). Biodiversity in (the Natura 2000) forest habitats is not static: its conservation calls for an active management approach. Journal of Nature Conservation, 43, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.004
  38. Křenová, Z., & Kindlmann, P. (2015). Natura 2000 – Solution for Eastern Europe or just a good start? The Šumava National Park as a test case. Biological Conservation, 186, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.028
  39. Kubacka, M., & Smaga, L. (2019). Effectiveness of Natura 2000 areas for environmental protection in 21 European countries. Regional Environmental Change, 19, 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01543-2
  40. Kupková, L., & Bičík, I. (2016). Landscape transition after the collapse of communism in Czechia. Journal of Maps, 12, 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1195301
  41. Kupková, L., Bičík, I., & Jeleček, L. (2021). At the crossroads of European landscape changes: major processes of landscape change in Czechia since the middle of the 19th century and their driving forces. Land, 10(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010034
  42. Kupková, L., Bičík, I., & Najman, J. (2013). Land Cover Changes along the Iron Curtain 1990–2006. Geografie, 118(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2013118020095
  43. Lasanta, T., Arnáez, J., Pascual, N., Ruiz-Flaño, P., Errea, M. P., & Lana-Renault, N. (2017). Space–time process and drivers of land abandonment in Europe. Catena, 149(3), 810–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.024
  44. Lawrence, A., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2023). Detecting low fragmented sites surrounding European protected areas – Implications for expansion of the Natura 2000 network. Journal of Nature Conservation, 74, 126398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126398
  45. Lawrence, A., Friedrich, F., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2021). Landscape fragmentation of the Natura 2000 network and its surrounding areas. PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0258615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258615
  46. Lindenmayer, D. (2018). Small patches make critical contributions to biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(3), 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820169116
  47. Lipský, Z. (2001). Present land use changes in the Czech cultural landscape: Driving forces and environmental consequences. Moravian Geographical Reports, 9, 2–14.
  48. Lipský, Z., Kupková, L., Chromý, P., Kučera, Z., Brůha, L., Janík, T., …, & Štefanová, E. (2022). Zaniklé krajiny Česka. Zprávy památkové péče, 82(4), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.56112/zpp.2022.4.02
  49. Mackovčin, P. (2009). Land use categorization based on topographic maps. Acta Pruhoniciana, 91, 5–13.
  50. Mallinis, G., Emmanoloudis, D., & Giannakopoulos, V. (2011). Mapping and interpreting historical land cover/land use changes in a Natura 2000 site using earth observational data: The case of Nestos delta, Greece. Applied Geography, 31(1), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.002
  51. Mammides, C., Zotos, S., & Martini, F. (2024). Quantifying the amount of land lost to artificial surfaces in European habitats: A comparison inside and outside Natura 2000 sites using a quasi-experimental design. Biological Conservation, 293, 110556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110556
  52. Mareš, P., Rašín, R., & Pipan, P. (2013). Abandoned Landscapes of Former German Settlement in the Czech Republic and in Slovenia. In I. Rotherham (Ed.), Cultural Severance and the Environment. Environmental History 2 (pp. 289–309). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6159-9_20
  53. Martínez-Fernández, J., Ruiz-Benito, P., & Zavala, M. A. (2015). Recent land cover changes in Spain across biogeographical regions and protection levels: Implications for conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 44, 62–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.021
  54. Miklín, J., & Čížek, L. (2014). Erasing a European biodiversity hot-spot: Open woodlands, veteran trees and mature forests succumb to forestry intensification, succession, and logging in a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Journal for Nature Conservation, 22(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.08.002
  55. Moser, B., Jaeger, J. A. G., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., & Eisel, B. (2007). Modification of the effective mesh size for measuring landscape fragmentation to solve the boundary problem. Landscape Ecology, 22, 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9023-0
  56. Mücher, C. A., Hazeu, G. W., Swetman, R., Gerard, F., Luque, S., Pino, J., & Halada, L. (2009). Historic land cover changes at Natura 2000 sites and their associated landscapes across Europe. In D. Maktav (Ed.), Remote Sensing for a Changing Europe (pp. 226–231). IOS Press.
  57. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic – NCA (2023). Území připravovaná k vyhlášení. https://www.nature.cz/uzemi-pripravovanak-vyhlaseni
  58. Palmero-Iniesta, M., Espelta, J. M., Gordillo, J., & Pino, J. (2020). Changes in forest landscape patterns resulting from recent afforestation in Europe (1990–2012): defragmentation of pre-existing forest versus new patch proliferation. Annals of Forest Science, 77, 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00946-0
  59. Pazúr, R., Feranec, J., Štych, P., Kopecká, M., & Holman, L. (2017). Changes of urbanised landscape identified and assessed by the Urban Atlas data: Case study of Prague and Bratislava. Land Use Policy, 61, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.022
  60. Pechanec, V., Machar, I., Pohanka, T., Opršal, Z., Petrovič, F., Švajda, J., …, & Málková, J. (2018). Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic. Nature Conservation, 24, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.24.21608
  61. Pelc, F. (2018). Ochrana přírody v České republice: Čtvrtstoletí změn a budoucnost. Vesmír, 97, 90–92.
  62. R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  63. Rempel, R., Carr, A., & Elkie, P. (2008). Patch Analyst for ArcGIS®. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Lakehead University.
  64. Romportl, D. (Ed.) (2017). Atlas fragmentace a konektivity terestrických ekosystémů v České republice. AOPK ČR.
  65. Schumacher, H., & Johst, A. (2015). Natura 2000 and wilderness in former military training grounds. Natur und Landschaft, 90(9/10), 459–464. https://dx.doi.org/10.17433/9.2015.50153361
  66. Seidl, T., & Chromý, P. (2010). Environmental conservation in military training areas – sources of spatial conflicts? Europa XXI, 21, 103–115.
  67. Šíbl, J., & Klimová, K. (2011). Obnova a manažment biotopov pieskových dún vo vojenskom výcvikovom priestore Záhorie. VTSÚ Záhorie, ŠOP SR, BROZ.
  68. Sklenička, P., Šímová, P., Hrdinová, K., & Salek, M. (2014). Changing rural landscapes along the border of Austria and the Czech Republic between 1952 and 2009: Roles of political, socioeconomic and environmental factors. Applied Geography, 47, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.12.006
  69. Skokanová, H. (2009). Application of methodological principles for assessment of land use changes trajectories and processes in South-Eastern Moravia for the period 1836–2006. Acta Pruhoniciana, 91, 15–21.
  70. Skokanová, H., Falťan, V., & Havlíček, M. (2016). Driving forces of main landscape change processes from past 200 years in Central Europe – differences between old democratic and post-socialist countries. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0004
  71. Skokanová, H., Havlíček, M., Klusáček, P., & Martinát, S. (2017). Five military training areas – five different trajectories of land cover development? Case studies from the Czech Republic. Geographia Cassoviensis, 11(2), 201–213
  72. Skokanová, H., Netopil, P., Havlíček, M., & Šarapatka, B. (2020). The role of traditional agricultural landscape structures in changes to green infrastructure connectivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 302, 107071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107071
  73. Svenningsen, S. R., Levin, G., & Perner, M. L. (2019). Military land use and the impact on landscape: A study of land use history on Danish Defence sites. Land Use Policy, 84, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.041
  74. Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947
  75. Zbierska, A. (2022). Landscape Changes in Protected Areas in Poland. Sustainability, 14(2), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020753
  76. Zielińska, K. (2007). The influence of roads on the species diversity of forest vascular flora in Central Poland. Biodiversity Research and Conservation, 5–8, 71–80.
  77. Žoncová, M. (2020). Land Cover Changes in Protected Areas of Slovakia Between 1990 and 2018. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 60(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.7996
  78. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (2002–2006). Raster base map of the Czech Republic, scale 1:10,000.
  79. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (2003–2005). Ortophoto of the Czech Republic. Available at: https://ags.cuzk.cz/geoprohlizec/?k=8491. Accessed with wms at: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_ARCHIV/WMService.aspx?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities
  80. Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre (2016–2020). Ortophoto of the Czech Republic. Available at: https://ags.cuzk.cz/geoprohlizec/?k=8491. Accessed with wms at: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_ARCHIV/WMService.aspx?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities
  81. General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army and Central Administration of Geodesy and Cartography (1957–1971). Topographic maps of the Czechoslovakia in the system S-1952, scale 1:10,000.
  82. Central Administration of Geodesy and Cartography (1986–1995). Base maps of Czechoslovakia, scale 1:10,000.
  83. General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army (1952–1956). Czechoslovak military topographic maps, scale 1:25,000.
  84. General Staff of the Czechoslovak Army (1988–1995). Czechoslovak military topographic maps, scale 1:25,000.
  85. Ministry of Agriculture (2016–2020). Land Parcel Information System. Available at: https://eagri.cz/public/app/lpisext/lpis/verejny2/plpis/; accessed via wms at: http://eagri.cz/public/app/wms/public_DPB_PB_OPV.fcgi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 106 - 116
Submitted on: Jan 30, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2025
Published on: Jun 30, 2025
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Tomáš Janík, Vladimír Zýka, Marek Havlíček, Roman Borovec, Katarína Demková, Hana Skokanová, Anna Lichová, Barbora Mrkvová, Dušan Romportl, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.