Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How data validity and granularity affect jobs accessibility: A case study from the Czech Republic Cover

How data validity and granularity affect jobs accessibility: A case study from the Czech Republic

Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. Ahlfeldt, G. M. (2007). If Alonso Was Right: Accessibility as Determinant for Attractiveness of Urban Location. Hamburg Contemporary Economic Discussions, (12), 1–36. http://www.hced.uni-hamburg.de/WorkingPapers/HCED_12.pdf
  2. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use: Towards a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  3. Boarnet, M., & Crane, R. (2001). The influence of land use on travel behavior: Specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 35(9), 823–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00019-7
  4. Chatman, D. G., & Nolan, R. B. (2011). Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research. Transport Reviews, 31(6), 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.587908
  5. CZSO (2011). 2011 Census Results – Open Data. https://csu.gov.cz/otevrena_data_pro_vysledky_scitani_lidu_domu_a_bytu_2011_sldb_2011
  6. CZSO (2021). 2021 Census Results – Open Data. https://csu.gov.cz/produkty/vysledky-scitani-2021-otevrena-data
  7. CZSO (2021). Veøejná databáze. Praha. SLDB 2021. https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=profiluzemi&uzemiprofil=34055&u=__VUZEMI__43__554782#
  8. de la Barra, T., Pérez, B., & Vera, N. (1984). TRANUS-J: putting large models into small computers. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 11(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1068/b110087
  9. Derudder, B., Taylor P. J., Hoyler M., Ni, P., Liu, X., Zhao, M., Shen, W., & Witlox, F. (2013). Measurement and interpretation of connectivity of Chinese cities in world city network, 2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(3), 261–273. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55756574.pdf
  10. de Vries, J. J., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Exponential or power distance-decay for commuting? An alternative specification. Environment and Planning A, 41(2), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39369
  11. Echenique, M. H. (1994). Urban and regional studies at the Martin Centre: Its Origins, its Present, its Future. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(5), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1068/b210517
  12. Echenique, M. H. (2011). Land use/transport models and economic assessment. Research in Transportation Economics, 31(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.007
  13. El-Geneidy, A., & Levinson, D. (2006). Access to Destinations: Development of Accessibility Measures. University of Minnesota.
  14. Erlebach, M., Tomáš, M., & Tonev, P. (2016). A functional interaction approach to the definition of meso regions: The case of the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0009
  15. Franke, D., Vorel, J., & Peltan, T. (2017). Job accessibility modelling in Prague Functional Urban Area. In Proceedings of the 2017 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP), Prague, The Czech Republic, 25–26 May 2017.
  16. Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
  17. Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 682–703. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
  18. Hansen, S. H. (2009). Analysing the Role of Accessibility in Contemporary Urban Development. In O. Gervasi, D. Taniar, B. Murgante, A. Laganà, Y. Mun, & M. L. Gavrilova (Eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2009. ICCSA 2009. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02454-2_27
  19. Hanson, S., & Giuliano, G. (Eds.) (2004). The Geography of Urban Transportation. Third Edition, London: The Guilford Press.
  20. Hewko, J., Smoyer-Tomic, K. E., & Hodgson, M. J. (2002). Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: Does aggregation error matter? Environment and Planning A, 34(7), 1185–1206. https://doi.org/10.1068/a34171
  21. Iacono, M., Krizek, K. J., & El-Geneidy, A. (2010). Measuring non-motorized accessibility: issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002
  22. IRP (2020). Chudé mìsto pražské? Veøejné finance Prahy v èeském a mezinárodním kontextu. Institut plánování a rozvoje hlavního mìsta Prahy. https://iprpraha.cz/uploads/assets/5694_IPR_Chude_mesto_prazske_sazba_16_korektura.pdf
  23. Kwan, M. P., & Weber, J. (2008). Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use–travel interaction. Applied Geography, 28(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.002
  24. Logan, T. M., Williams, T. G., Nisbet, A. J., Liberman, K., Zuo, C. T., & Guikema, S. D. (2017). Evaluating urban accessibility: leveraging open-source data and analytics to overcome existing limitations. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317736528
  25. Lopane, F. D., Kalantzi, E., Milton, R., & Batty, M. (2023). A land-use transport-interaction framework for large scale strategic urban modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 104: 102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.102007
  26. Lowry, I. S. (1964). A Model of Metropolis, Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
  27. Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976328
  28. Maier, K., Drda, F., Mulíèek O., & Sýkora L. (2007). Dopravní dostupnost funkèních mìstských regionù a urbanizovaných zón v Èeské republice. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 10(3), 75–80.
  29. Maier, K., Mulíèek, O., & Franke, D. (2010). Vývoj regionalizace a vliv infrastruktur na atraktivitu území Èeské republiky. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 8(5), 71–81.
  30. Martens, V., Lavalle, C., Batista e Silva, F., & Poelman, H. (2013). Population estimation for the urban atlas polygons. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/54791
  31. Micek, O., Feranec, J., & Štych, P. (2020). Land Use/Land Cover Data of the Urban Atlas and the Cadastre of Real Estate: An Evaluation Study in the Prague Metropolitan Region. Land, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050153
  32. Modelistica (2011). TRANUS General description. https://modelistica.com.mx/files/GeneralDescriptionTranus.pdf
  33. Modelistica (2012). Mathematical description of TRANUS. https://modelistica.com.mx/files/MathDescription.pdf
  34. MoF (2024). Percentage share of individual municipalities in the shares of the national gross value added tax and income tax revenue. https://www.mfcr.cz/cs/kontrola-a-regulace/legislativa/legislativnidokumenty/2024/vyhlaska-c-250-2024-sb-o-procentnim-podilujednotl-56947
  35. Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L. & Wigan, M. R. (1979). Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: General, 13(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8
  36. Musil, J. (1966). Sociology of Urban Redevelopment Areas: A Study from Czechoslovakia. International Review of Community Development, 213–238.
  37. Neis, P., Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2011). The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet, 4(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4010001
  38. Novotný, V. (2011). Towards the Regional Acupuncture: How Far Is Too Far Away. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of life sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague.
  39. Nyamai, D. N., & Schramm, S. (2023). Accessibility, mobility, and spatial justice in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2071284
  40. Openshaw, S. (1983). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, Norwich: Geo Books.
  41. OSM (2011). OpenStreetMaps data. https://download.geofabrik.de/europe/czech-republic.html
  42. Pazúr, R., Feranec, J., Štych, P., Kopecká, M., & Holman, L. (2017). Changes of urbanised landscape identified and assessed by the Urban Atlas data: Case study of Prague and Bratislava. Land Use Policy, 61, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.022
  43. Rohr, C., & Williams, I. N. (1994). Modelling the regional economic impacts of the Channel Tunnel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1068/b210555
  44. Rosik, P., Pu³awska-Obiedowska, S., & Goliszek, S. (2021). Public transport accessibility to upper secondary schools measured by the potential quotient: The case of Kraków. Moravian Geographical Reports, 29(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0002
  45. Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (2007). European regional accessibility and the spatial impacts of transport energy price increases. In The accessibility and attractiveness of rural and landlocked areas: sustainable transport and services of general interest. European spatial planning and landscape, 87. https://www.spiekermann-wegener.de/pub/pdf/CEMAT_Accessibility_2007.pdf
  46. UrbanAtlas (2012). Urban Atlas Land Cover/Land Use 2012 (vector). https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/urban-atlas/urban-atlas-2012
  47. Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950118878
  48. Visser, H. (2004). The MAP COMPARISON KIT: Methods, Software and Applications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27451992_The_MAP_COMPARISON_KIT_methods_software_and_applications
  49. von Thünen, J. H. (1826). Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, oder Untersuchungen über den Einfluss, den die Getreidepreise, der Reichtum des Bodens und die Abgaben auf Ackerbau ausüben. Perthes.
  50. Waddell, P. (2002). UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation and Environmental Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976274
  51. Wee, B. (2022). Accessibility and equity: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Transport Geography, 104, 103421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103421
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2024-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 258 - 267
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 6, 2024
Published on: Jan 17, 2025
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Daniel Franke, Tomáš Peltan, Vojtìch Novotný, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.