Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Turów coal mine international dispute as a determinant of the cross-border integration of inhabitants of the Polish-Czech border Cover

The Turów coal mine international dispute as a determinant of the cross-border integration of inhabitants of the Polish-Czech border

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Andersen, D. J., & Prokkola, E. K. (Eds.) (2021). Borderlands resilience: Transitions, adaptation and resistance at borders. Routledge.
  2. Anheier, H., & Kendall, J. (2002). Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: examining three approaches. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131022000000545
  3. Arieli, T. (2016). Borders, conflict and security. International Journal of Conflict Management, 27(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2015-0050
  4. Aspinwall, M. (2021). Bringing rights to life: How civil society organizations help guarantee participation rights in developing countries. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(3), 100923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100923
  5. Beck, J. (Ed.) (2019). Transdisciplinary Discourses on Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe. Peter Lang.
  6. Berg, E. (2018). Bridging the divide between parent states and secessionist entities: a new perspective for conflict management? Space and Polity, 22(1), 15–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1457341
  7. Blatter, J. K. (2001). Debordering the world of states: Towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America insights from border regions. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 175–209.
  8. Boháč, A., Łaźniewska, E., & Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2023). Geographical Preconditions of the International Controversies around the Turów Mine. In H. Y. Gomez Arias, & G. Antošová (Eds.), Considerations of Territorial Planning, Space, and Economic Activity in the Global Economy (pp. 126–147). IGI Global.
  9. Böhm, H. (2022a). Challenges of Pandemic-Related Border Closures for Everyday Lives of Poles and Czechs in the Divided Town of Cieszyn/Český Těšín: Integrated Functional Space or Reemergence of Animosities? Nationalities papers, 50(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.51
  10. Böhm, H. (2022b). Sprachliche (A-)Symmetrien in der Euroregion Neisse-Nysa-Nisa: Analyse von Projekten zur Förderung der Nachbarschaftssprachen. In T. Weber & H. Böhm (Eds.), Wissenskommunikation unter Bedingungen von Mehrsprachigkeit (pp. 55–71). Peter Lang.
  11. Böhm, H. (2023). Five roles of cross-border cooperation against re-bordering. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 38(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1948900
  12. Böhm, H., Boháč, A., & Wróblewski, Ł. (2023). Evaluation of cross-border cooperation in Czechia since 1993: Euroregions on the way to authentic cross-border regions? Geografický časopis, 75(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.31577/geogrcas.2023.75.3.13
  13. Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
  14. Branda, P. (2009). Euroregiony v České republice – komparativní analýza. Současná Evropa, 2009(1), 71–101.
  15. Chilla, T., Evrard, E., & Schulz, C. (2012). On the Territoriality of Cross-Border Cooperation: "Institutional Mapping" in a Multi-Level Context. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673563
  16. Chilla, T., & Lambracht, M. (2022). Institutional mapping of cross-border cooperation. INTERREG programme analyses with KEEP data. European Planning Studies, 31(4), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2058321
  17. Centrum Informacji o Rynku Energii (2021). PGE GiEK: Kompleks Turów strategiczny dla zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa energetycznego Polski [online]. https://www.cire.pl/artykuly/serwis-informacyjny-cire-24/181242-pge-giek-kompleks-turow-strategiczny-dla-zapewnieniabezpieczenstwa-energetycznego-polski
  18. CZSO (2021a). Veřejná databáze [online]. https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2
  19. CZSO (2021b). Základní statististické ukazatele Euroregionu Neisse-Nisa-Nysa – rok 2021 [online]. https://www.czso.cz/csu/xl/rok-2021
  20. Datel, J. V., & Hrabánková, A. (2020). Povrchový důl Turów: Stručné shrnutí současných i potenciálních budoucích negativních dopadů na poměry povrchových a podzemních vod na území České republiky. VÚV TGM.
  21. Drápela, E., & Bašta, J. (2018). Kvantifikace síly hraničního efektu na hranicích Libereckého kraje. Geografické informácie, 22(1), 51–60.
  22. Durand, F., & Decoville, A. (2019). A multidimensional measurement of the integration between European border regions. Journal of European Integration, 42(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1657857
  23. European Commission (2021). EU Border Regions: Living labs of European integration. COM. Publications Office of the European Union.
  24. Eurostat (2021). Production of lignite in the EU – statistics [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Production_of_lignite_in_the_EU_-_statistics
  25. Faludi, A. (2018). The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning. Edward Elgar.
  26. Fawn, R. (2006). The Temelín nuclear power plant and the European Union in Austrian–Czech relations. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.12.001
  27. Hippe, S., Bertram, D., Chilla, T. (2023). Convergence and resilience in border regions. European Planning Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2170214
  28. Hřebíčková, M., & Graf, S. (2014). Accuracy of National Stereotypes in Central Europe: Outgroups are not Better than Ingroup in considering Personality Traits of Real People. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1904
  29. IMM (2021). Spór Polski i Czech o Turów. Jak sprawa kształtuje się w mediach? [online]. https://www.imm.com.pl/spor-polski-i-czech-oturow-jak-sprawa-ksztaltuje-sie-w-mediach
  30. Kajta, J., & Opiłowska E. (2021). The Impact of Covid-19 on Structure and Agency in a Borderland. The Case of Two Twin Towns in Central Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1996259
  31. Konarski, R. (2015). Modele równań strukturalnych. Teoria i praktyka. Wydawnictwo PWN.
  32. Kurnicki, K., & Sternberg, M. (2016). Arrested conflict: transnational place-making in Polish-German border towns. Space and Polity, 20(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2016.1225860
  33. Kurowska-Pysz, J., Łaźniewska, E., Böhm, H., & Boháč, A. (2022). Cross-border cooperation in the shadow of crisis – the Turów Coalmine case. Journal of International Studies, 15(4), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-4/3
  34. KWB Turów (2023). O oddziale [online]. https://kwbturow.pgegiek.pl/O-oddziale
  35. Laine, J. P. (2021). Epilogue: Borderland resilience: thriving in adversity? In D. J. Andersen & E. K. Prokkola (Eds.), Borderlands Resilience (pp. 182–192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131328
  36. Lehtonen, M., & De Carlo, L. (2019). Diffuse institutional trust and specific institutional mistrust in Nordic Participatory Planning: Experience from contested urban projects. Planning Theory and Practice, 20(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1606929
  37. Makkonen, T., Hokkanen, T. J., Korhonen, J., & Malkamäki, A. (2019). Cross-border regional resilience: conceptual and empirical notions. In Perspektivy social`no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia prigranichnyh regionov 2019 (pp. 18–23). https://doi.org/10.36867/BR.2019.87.66.003
  38. Martinelli, A. (2018). National populism and the European Union. Populism, 1(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-01011000
  39. Mazzoleni, O. (2023). Introduction: national populism and the politicization of borders in a changing Europe. In O. Mazzoleni, C. Biancalana, A. Pilotti, L. Bernhard, G. Yerly, & L. Lauener (Eds.), National Populism and Borders (pp. 1–15). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802208054.00007
  40. Meinhof, U. H. (2003). Migrating borders: an introduction to European identity construction in process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(5), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000149569
  41. Mirwaldt, K. (2010). Contact, conflict and geography: What factors shape cross-border citizen relations? Political Geography, 29(8), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.10.004
  42. Newton Media (2021). Mediální analýza sporu o důl Turów ukazuje, jak rozdílné argumenty zaznívají na české a polské straně [online]. https://www.focus-age.cz/m-journal/aktuality/medialni-analyzasporu-o-dul-turow-ukazuje--jak-rozdilne-argumenty-zaznivaji-naceske-a-polske-strane__s288x16056.html
  43. Novotný, L., & Böhm, H. (2022) New re-bordering left them alone and neglected: Czech cross-border commuters in German-Czech borderland. European Societies 24(3): 333-353. 10.1080/14616696.2022.2052144
  44. Öge, K. (2017). Transparent autocracies: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and civil society in authoritarian states. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(4), 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.12.010.
  45. Opioła, W., & Böhm, H. (2022). Euroregion as political actor: managing the border policies in the time of COVID-19 in Polish borderlands. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(6), 896–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.2017339
  46. Paldam, M. (2000). Social capital: one or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of economic surveys, 14(5), 629–653.
  47. Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza (2019). Wybory do Sejmu i Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 2019 [online]. https://sejmsenat2019.pkw.gov.pl/sejmsenat2019/pl/wyniki/komitet/26079/sejm/pow/22500
  48. Pászto, V., Macků, K., Burian, J., Pánek, J., & Tuček, P. (2019). Capturing cross-border continuity: The case of the Czech-Polish borderland. Moravian Geographical Reports, 27(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0010
  49. Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-Border Regions in Europe: Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-Border Cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 153–171.
  50. Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27(4), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.03.002
  51. Popescu, G. (2012) Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  52. Przybylski, W. (2018). Explaining Eastern Europe: Can Poland's backsliding be stopped? Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0044
  53. Schultz, K. A. (2015). Borders, Conflict, and Trade. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpolisci-020614-095002
  54. Scott, J. W. (2020). Hungarian border politics as an anti-politics of the European Union. Geopolitics, 25(3), 658–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1548438
  55. Shaw, K. (2012). The rise of the resilient local authority? Local Government Studies, 38(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.642869
  56. Siatkowski, J., Olszewski, M., & Konik, J. (2022): The Turów Mine crisis and its impact on Czech-Polish cross-border cooperation: evaluation, conclusions and recommendations. Scientific report – if you are interested in providing it, contact the corresponding author.
  57. Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2013). Cross-Border Mobility, Unfamiliarity and Development Policy in Europe. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716235
  58. Statistics Poland (2023). Basic data [online]. https://stat.gov.pl/en/basic-data
  59. Stoklosa, K., & Besier, G. (2014). European Border Regions in Comparison Overcoming Nationalistic Aspects or Re-Nationalization? Routledge.
  60. Sumner, B. T. (2004). Territorial disputes at the International Court of Justice. Duke Law Journal, 53, 1779–1812.
  61. Svensson, S., & Balogh, P. (2021). Resilience at Hungary's borders. In D. J. Andersen & E. K., Prokkola (Eds.), Borderlands Resilience (pp. 73–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131328
  62. Szent-Ivanyi, B., & Kugiel, P. (2020). The Challenge from within: EU Development Cooperation and the Rise of Illiberalism in Hungary and Poland. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 16(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1078
  63. Teraz Środowisko (2021). Polska wnosi do TSUE o odrzucenie wniosku Czech o zatrzymanie kopalni Turów [online]. https://www.terazsrodowisko.pl/aktualnosci/tsue-kopalnia-turow-czechy-10169.html
  64. Timm, N. H. (2002). Applied Multivariate Analysis. Springer.
  65. Varga, M., & Buzogány, A. (2021). The Foreign Policy of Populists in Power: Contesting Liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1442–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564
  66. Van Houtum, H. (2000). European perspectives on borderlands: an overview of European geographical research on borders and border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 15(1), 56–83.
  67. Vazquez, F. J. C. (2015). Reviewing the Spanish-Portuguese border: Conflict, interaction and cross-border cooperation. Estudios Fronterizos, 16(31), 65–89.
  68. Wróblewski, Ł. (2020). Kształtowamie relacji na polsko-czeskim transgranicznym rynku usług kultury. PWE.
  69. Zach, F. J., & Hill, T. L. (2017). Network, knowledge and relationship impacts on innovation in tourism destinations. Tourism Management, 62, 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.04.001
  70. Żuk, P., & Żuk, P. (2022a). Civic energy and the traditions of the idea of civil society: Dilemmas, frames and discussions. Energy Research and Social Science, 92, 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102798
  71. Żuk, P., & Żuk, P. (2022b). The Turów Brown Coal Mine in the shadow of an international conflict: Surveying the actions of the European Union Court of Justice and the populist policies of the Polish government. The Extractive Industries and Society, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101054
  72. Żuk, P. (2023). The Sense of Socio-Economic Threat and the Perception of Climate Challenges and Attitudes towards Energy Transition among Residents of Coal Basins: The Case of Turoszów Basin in Poland. Resources Policy, 82, 103509. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4252206
  73. Żuk, P., Buzogány, A., Mišík, M., Osička, J., & Szulecki, K. (2023). Semi-peripheries in the world-system? The Visegrad group countries in the geopolitical order of energy and raw materials after the war in Ukraine. Resources Policy, 85, Part B, 104046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104046
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2023-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 203 - 213
Submitted on: Jul 16, 2023
|
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2023
|
Published on: Dec 26, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Łukasz Wróblewski, Artur Boháč, Hynek Böhm, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.