Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Public transport accessibility to upper secondary schools measured by the potential quotient: The case of Kraków Cover

Public transport accessibility to upper secondary schools measured by the potential quotient: The case of Kraków

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. BIOSCA, O., SPIEKERMANN, K., STĘPNIAK, M. (2013): Transport Accessibility at Regional Scale. Europa XXI, 24: 5–17.10.7163/Eu21.2013.24.1
  2. CAVE, W., CHESTER, M. A. (1981): A sociology of education: access to power and privilege. New York, Macmillan Publishing.
  3. CHENG, J., BERTOLINI, L. (2013): Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity. Journal of Transport Geography, 30: 100–109.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.03.005
  4. CZYŻ, T. (2002): Application of the potential model to the analysis of regional differences in Poland. Geographia Polonica, 75(1): 13–24.
  5. DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (2005): Guidance on Accessibility Planning in Local Transport Plans. 104.
  6. DONY, C. C., DELMELLE, E. M., DELMELLE, E. C. (2015): Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: A Variable-width Floating Catchment Area (VFCA) method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143: 90–99.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.011
  7. GAO, Y., HE, Q., LIU, Y., ZHANG, L., WANG, H., CAI, E. (2016): Imbalance in Spatial Accessibility to Primary and Secondary Schools in China: Guidance for Education. Sustainability, 8(12): 1236.10.3390/su8121236
  8. GEURS, K., ZONDAG, B., DE JONG, G., DE BOK, M. (2010): Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(7): 382–393.10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006
  9. GEURS, K. T., RITSEMA VAN ECK, J. (2001): Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact. RIVM Report, 787: 1–265.
  10. GEURS, K. T., VAN WEE, B. (2004): Accessibility measures: a literature review. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport geography, 12(2): 127–140.
  11. GODDARD, M., SMITH, P. (2001): Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 53(9): 1149–62.10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00415-9
  12. GOLISZEK, S. (2021): GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland. Journal of Geographical Systems, 23(1): Forthcoming. Doi: 10.1007/s10109-020-00337-z.10.1007/s10109-020-00337-z
  13. GOLISZEK, S., POŁOM, M., DUMA, P. (2020): Potential and cumulative accessibility of workplaces by public transport in Szczecin. Bulletin of Geography. Socioeconomic Series, 50: 133–146.
  14. GOULD, P. R. (1969): Spatial diffusion. Commission on College Geography. Resource Paper No. 4.
  15. GULHAN, G., CEYLAN, H., ÖZUYSAL, M., CEYLAN, H. (2013): Impact of utility-based accessibility measures on urban public transportation planning: A case study of Denizli, Turkey. Cities, 32: 102–112.10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.001
  16. GUS (2013): Wybory ścieżki kształcenia a sytuacja zawodowa Polaków.
  17. GUS (2018): Dojazdy uczniów do szkół zlokalizowanych w miastach wojewódzkich.
  18. GUTIERREZ, J., CONDECO-MELHORADO, A., LOPEZ, E., MONZON, A. (2011): Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 840–850.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.011
  19. GUZIK, R. (2003a): Przestrzenna dostępność szkolnictwa ponadpodstawowego, Kraków: Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  20. GUZIK, R. (2003b): Interpretacja przestrzennej dostępności szkół ponadpodstawowych w oparciu o metodę ilorazu potencjału. In: Rogacki, H. [ed.]: Problemy interpretacji wyników metod badawczych stosowanych w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej i gospodarce przestrzennej (pp. 101–110). Poznań, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bogucki.
  21. HALAS, M., KLAPKA, P. (2015): Spatial influence of regional centres of Slovakia: analysis based on the distance-decay function. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 26(2): 169–185.10.1007/s12210-015-0387-4
  22. HANSEN, W. G. (1959): How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2): 73–76.10.1080/01944365908978307
  23. JOHNSTON, R. J., GREGORY, D., SMITH, D. M. [eds.] (1994): The Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  24. JURKOWSKI, W., SMOLARSKI, M. (2018): The impact of transport supply on passenger volume characterising regional rail transport in Lower Silesia. Europa XXI, 34: 79–93.10.7163/Eu21.2018.34.5
  25. KBR in Gdańsk (2016): Gdańskie Badania Ruchu. Gdańsk, Gdańsk Development Office.
  26. KBR in Kraków (2013): Badania zachowań komunikacyjnych mieszkańców Krakowskiego Obszaru Metropolitarnego. Politechnika Krakowska, PBS Sp. z o.o., Jan Friedberg – Projektowanie i doradztwo w zarządzaniu, EKKOM Sp. z o.o. and International Management Services Sp. z o.o., Kraków.
  27. KBR in Poznań (2013): Badania i opracowanie planu transportowego aglomeracji poznańskiej, Plan transportowy aglomeracji poznańskiej. Poznań, Biuro Inżynierii Transportu. Pracownie Projektowe sp.j.
  28. KBR in Warsaw (2015): PBS Sp. z o.o., Badanie zachowań transportowych mieszkańców Warszawy, Politechnika Krakowska and Politechnika Warszawska.
  29. KNOX, P. L. (1978): The intraurban ecology of primary medical care: patterns of accessibility and their policy implications. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 4(1): 415–435.10.1068/a100415
  30. KUČEROVÁ, S. R., BLÁHA, J. D., KUČERA, Z. (2015): Transformations of spatial relationships in elementary education: A case study of changes in two Czech rural areas since the second half of the 20th century. Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(1): 34–44.10.1515/mgr-2015-0004
  31. KUREK, S., WÓJTOWICZ, M., GAŁKA, Z. (2015): The changing role of migration and natural increase in suburban population growth: The case of a non-capital post-socialist city (The Krakow Metropolitan Area, Poland). Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(4): 59–70.10.1515/mgr-2015-0025
  32. LEE, J., LUBIENSKI, C. (2017): The Impact of School Closures on Equity of Access in Chicago. Education & Urban Society, 49(1): 53–80.10.1177/0013124516630601
  33. LITMAN, T. (2008): Evaluating accessibility for transportation planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, Canada.
  34. LÓPEZ, E., GUTIÉRREZ, J., GÓMEZ, G. (2008): Measuring Regional Cohesion Effects of Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Investments: An Accessibility Approach, European Planning Studies, 16: 277–301.10.1080/09654310701814629
  35. LUCAS, K. (2012): Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20: 105–113.10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
  36. MANAUGH, K., BADAMI, M. G., EL-GENEIDY, A. M. (2015): Integrating social equity into urban transportation planning: A critical evaluation of equity objectives and measures in transportation plans in North America. Transport Policy, 37: 167–176.10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.013
  37. MARTENS, K. (2012): Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer’s “Spheres of Justice” to the transport sector. Transportation, 39(6): 1035–1053.10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7
  38. MCGRAIL, M. R. (2012): Spatial accessibility of primary health care utilising the two-step floating catchment area method: an assessment of recent improvements. International Journal of Health Geographics, 11(1): 50.10.1186/1476-072X-11-50352070823153335
  39. MORENO-MONROY, A. I., LOVELACE, R., RAMOS, F. R. (2018): Public transport and school location impacts on educational inequalities: Insights from São Paulo. Journal of Transport Geography, 67: 110–118.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.012
  40. NIEDZIELSKI, M. A., KUCHARSKI, R. (2019): Impact of commuting, time budgets, and activity durations on modal disparity in accessibility to supermarkets. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 75: 106–120.10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.021
  41. ORTEGA, E., LÓPEZ, E., MONZÓN, A. (2012): Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels, Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 130–141.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008
  42. ÖSTH, J., LYHAGEN, J., REGGIANI, A. (2016): A new way of determining distance decay parameters in spatial interaction models with application to job accessibility analysis in Sweden. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 16(2): 344–363.
  43. PACIONE, M. (1989): Access to urban services – the case of secondary schools in Glasgow. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 105: 12–18.10.1080/00369228918736746
  44. PASHKEVICH, A., PUŁAWSKA, S. (2016): Assessment of Shopping Malls Accessibility: Case Study of Kraków. In CIT2016 – XII Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte València, Universitat Politècnica de València.10.4995/CIT2016.2016.4117
  45. PRITCHARD, J. P., MOURA, F., E SILVA, J. A., MARTINEZ, L. M. (2014): Spatial analysis of transportation-related social exclusion in the Lisbon metropolitan area. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111: 440–449.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.077
  46. QVISTRÖM, M. (2015): Putting accessibility in place: A relational reading of accessibility in policies for transitoriented development. Geoforum, 58: 166–173.10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.007
  47. RICH, D. C. (1978): Population potential, potential transportation cost and industrial location. Area, 10(3): 222–226.
  48. ROSIK, P., POMIANOWSKI, W., KOMORNICKI T., GOLISZEK, S., SZEJGIEC-KOLENDA, B., DUMA, P. (2020): Regional dispersion of potential accessibility quotient at the intra-European and intranational level. Core-periphery pattern, discontinuity belts and distance decay tornado effect, Journal of Transport Geography, 82: 102554.
  49. SALZE, P., BANOS, A., OPPERT, J. M., CHARREIRE, H., CASEY, R., SIMON, C., CHAIX, B., BADARIOTTI, D., WEBER, C. (2011): Estimating spatial accessibility to facilities on the regional scale: an extended commutingbased interaction potential model. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(1): 2.10.1186/1476-072X-10-2302263521219597
  50. SCOTT, D. M., HORNER, M. W. (2008): The role of urban form in shaping access to opportunities. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1(2): 89–119.
  51. SIO (2016): Schools and educational institutions – identification data; List of schools and educational institutions: List of schools and facilities in Małopolska – data according to SIO of September 30 [online]. Available at: https://kuratorium.Kraków.pl/szkoly-i-placowkioswiatowe-dane-identyfikacyjne/
  52. SKOV-PETERSEN, H. (2001): Estimation of distancedecay parameters-GIS-based indicators of recreational accessibility. ScanGIS, 2001(June): 237–258.
  53. STĘPNIAK, M., GOLISZEK, S. (2017): Spatio-Temporal Variation of Accessibility by Public Transport – The Equity Spatio-Temporal Variation of Accessibility by Public Transport – The Equity Perspective. In: Ivan, I., Singleton, A., Horák, J., Inspektor, T. [eds.]: The Rise of Big Spatial Data. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (pp. 241–261). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_18
  54. STĘPNIAK, M., PRITCHARD, J. P., GEURS, K. T., GOLISZEK, S. (2019): The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland, Journal of Transport Geography, 75: 8–24.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.007
  55. STĘPNIAK, M., ROSIK, P. (2016): From improvement in accessibility to the impact on territorial cohesion: the spatial approach. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(3): 1–13.
  56. STĘPNIAK, M., ROSIK, P. (2018): The role of transport and population components in change in accessibility: the influence of the distance decay parameter. Networks and Spatial Economics, 18(2): 291–312.10.1007/s11067-017-9376-8
  57. STĘPNIAK, M., WISNIEWSKI, R., GOLISZEK, S., MARCIŃCZAK, S. (2017): Dostępność przestrzenna do usług publicznych w Polsce. IGiPZ PAN.
  58. SZARATA, A. (2013): Modelowanie podróży wzbudzonych oraz tłumionych zmianą stanu infrastruktury transportowej. Kraków, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej. Seria Inżynieria Lądowa.
  59. SZARATA, A. (2014): Kompleksowe Badania Ruchu w Krakowie w 2013 r. – wybrane wyniki. Logistyka, 6: 13798–13805.
  60. THELIN, M., NIEDOMYSL, T. (2015): The (ir)relevance of geography for school choice: Evidence from a Swedish choice experiment. Geoforum, 67: 110–120.10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.003
  61. TIRAN, J., LAKNER, M., DROBNE, S. (2019): Modelling walking accessibility: A case study of Ljubjana, Slovenia. Moravian Geographical Reports, 27(4): 194–206.10.2478/mgr-2019-0015
  62. TSOU, K. W., HUNG, Y. T., CHANG, Y. L.(2005): An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6): 424–435.10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.004
  63. VAN WEE, B., GEURS, K. (2011): Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4): 350–367.
  64. VAN WEE, B., HAGOORT, M., ANNEMA, J. A. (2001): Accessibility measures with competition. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3): 199–208.10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00010-2
  65. WALASZEK, M. (2006): Dostępność przestrzenna szkół oraz warunki i wyniki nauczania w aglomeracji poznańskiej, Poznań, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  66. WALASZEK, M. (2016): Zasięg oddziaływania szkolnictwa ponadgimnazjalnego na przykładzie miasta Poznania - Spatial Range of Secondary Education on the Example of Poznan Marzena Walaszek. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 4(6): 129–146.10.18559/SOEP.2016.6.8
  67. WAN, N., ZOU, B., STERNBERG, T. (2012): A three-step floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(6): 1073–1089.10.1080/13658816.2011.624987
  68. WANG, C. H., CHEN, N. (2015): A GIS-based spatial statistical approach to modeling job accessibility by transportation mode: Case study of Columbus, Ohio. Journal of Transport Geography, 45: 1–11.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.03.015
  69. WEGENER, M., KVĚTOŇ, V., MARADA, M., SCHÜRMANN, C., BIOSCA, O., SEGUI, A. U., ANTIKAINEN, H., KOTAVAARA, O., RUSANE, J., BIELAŃSKA, D., FIORELLO, D., KOMORNICKI, T., ROSIK, P., STĘPNIAK, M. (2015): TRACC – Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe. European Spatial Planning Observation Network – ESPON, 2: 264.
  70. WEIBULL, J. W. (1976): An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 6(4): 357–379.10.1016/0166-0462(76)90031-4
  71. WIDENER, M. J., FARBER S., NEUTENS T., HORNER M. W. (2013): Using urban commuting data to calculate a spatiotemporal accessibility measure for food environment studies. Health and Place, 21: 1–9.10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.00423395918
  72. WIĘCKOWSKI, M., SAARINEN J. (2019): Tourism transitions, changes, and the creation of new spaces and places in Central-Eastern Europe. Geographia Polonica, 92(4): 369–377.10.7163/GPol.0154a
  73. WILLIAMS, S., WANG, F. (2014): Disparities in accessibility of public high schools, in metropolitan Baton Rouge, Louisiana 1990–2010. Urban Geography, 35(7): 1066–1083.10.1080/02723638.2014.936668
  74. YE, C., ZHU, Y., YANG, J., FU, Q. (2018): Spatial equity in accessing secondary education: Evidence from a gravitybased model. Canadian Geographer, 62(4): 452–469.10.1111/cag.12482
  75. ZELINSKY, T., KUBAK, M. (2014): Distance to Education and Health Services by Pupils from Marginalized Roma Communities. Central European Conference in Regional Science CERS 2014: 1180–1187.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2021-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 26
Submitted on: Mar 25, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 30, 2020
Published on: Apr 18, 2021
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Piotr Rosik, Sabina Puławska-Obiedowska, Sławomir Goliszek, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.