Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of territorial benefits and efficiency from the construction of motorway and speed train networks: The Czech case Cover

Assessment of territorial benefits and efficiency from the construction of motorway and speed train networks: The Czech case

By:
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. ADAMS, J. S. (1970): Residential structure of mid-western cities. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 60: 37–62.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1970.tb00703.x
  2. BALCHIN, P., KIEVE, J. L., BULL, G. H. (1988): Urban land economics and public policy. London, Macmillan Education.10.1007/978-1-349-19444-5
  3. BECK, M., BLIEMER, M. (2015): Does building more roads create more traffic? City Metric [online]. Available at: https://www.citymetric.com/authors/m-beck-and-m-bliemer
  4. BEZÁK, A. (1975): Několik poznámek k matematickému modelování v ekonomické geografii. Geografický časopis 27(1): 9–15.
  5. BLACK, W. R. (2003): Transportation: a geographical analysis. New York, Guilford Press.
  6. BRAESS, D. (1968): Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung Operations Research 12(1): 258–268.10.1007/BF01918335
  7. BRINKE, J. (1999): Úvod do geografie dopravy. Praha, Karolinum.
  8. BROVELLI, M. A., MINGHINI, M., MOLINARI, M., MOONEY, P. (2017): Towards an automated comparison of OpenStreetMap with authoritative road datasets. Transactions in GIS 21: 191–206.10.1111/tgis.12182
  9. CHRISTIE, E. (2001): Potential trade in Southeast Europe: a gravity model approach. Working Papers WIIW Balkan Observatory 011: 1–35.
  10. COCHRANE, R. A. (1975): A possible economic basis for the gravity model. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1975: 34–49.
  11. COE, N. M., KELLY, P. F., YEUNG, H. W. C. (2007): Economic geography: a contemporary introduction. Oxford, Blackwell.
  12. CONDEÇO-MELHORADO, A., REGGIANI, A., GUTIÉRREZ, J. (2014): Accessibility and spatial interaction. NECTAR Series on transportation and communication networks. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781782540731
  13. CRESWELL, T. (2010): Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and space, 28: 17–31.10.1068/d11407
  14. ČSÚ (CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE) (1993, 2003, 2013). Census 1991, 2001, 2011.
  15. ČTK, 2018: Osobní přeprava Českých drah [online]. Available at: https://www.ceskenoviny.cz/zpravy/ceskym-draham-se-loni-zvysil-pocet-cestujicich-na-174-7-milionu/1579722
  16. DELBOSC, A., CURRIE, G. (2011): Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6): 1252–1259.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008
  17. GEURS, K. T., VAN WEE, B. (2004): Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12: 127–140.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
  18. GEURS, K., ZONDAG, B., DE JONG, G., DE BOK, M. (2010): Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings. Transportation Research Part D. Transport and Environment, 15(7): 382–393.10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006
  19. GRASER, A., STRAUB, M., DRAGASCHNIG M. (2015): Is OSM Good Enough for Vehicle Routing? A Study Comparing Street Networks in Vienna. In: Gartner, G., Huang H. [eds.]: Progress in Location-Based Services 2014. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-11879-6_1
  20. GRIMES, A., YOUNG C. (2013): Spatial effects of urban rail upgrades. Journal of Transport Geography, 30: 1–6.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.003
  21. HAMPL, M. (2005): Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: Transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. Praha, Karlova Univerzita.
  22. HANLY, M., DARGAY, J. M. (2003): A panel exploration of travel to work: An investigation. London, University College London, ESRC Transport Studies Unit, Centre for Transport Studies.
  23. HANSEN, W. G. (1959): How Accessibility Shapes Land-Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2): 73–76.10.1080/01944365908978307
  24. HANSON, S. (2004): The context of urban travel. Concepts and recent trends. In: Hanson, S. Giuliano, G. [eds.]: The geography of urban transportation (pp. 3–29). New York, The Guilford Press.
  25. HELDT-CASSEL, S., MACUCHOVA, Z., RUDHOLM, N., RYDELL, A. (2013): Willingness to commute long distance among job seekers in Dalarna, Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 28: 49–55.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.10.011
  26. HUDEČEK, T. (2010): Dostupnost v Česku v období 1991–2001: Vztah k dojížďce do zaměstnání a do škol. Praha, Česká geografická společnost.
  27. HUFF, D. (1963): A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Economics, 39: 81–90.10.2307/3144521
  28. HUFF D. L., JENKS, G. F. (1968): A graphic interpretation of the friction of distance in gravity models. Association of American Geographers, 58: 814–824.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1968.tb01670.x
  29. INGRAM, D. R. (1971): The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an Operational Form. Regional Studies, 5(2): 101–105.10.1080/09595237100185131
  30. JOHANSSON, B., KLAESSON, J., OLSSON, M. (2002): On the non-linearity of the willingness to commute. Wien, ERSA [online]. Available at: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/476.pdf
  31. KEELING, D. J. (2008): Transportation geography – new regional mobilities. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2): 275–283.10.1177/0309132507084400
  32. KHADAROO, J., SEETANAH, B. (2008): The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: a gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29(5): 831–840.10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.005
  33. KORUNKA, C., KUBICEK, B. (2017): Job demands in a changing world of work. Cahm, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0
  34. KRAFT, S. (2012): A transport classification of settlement centres in the Czech Reepublic using cluster analysis. Moravian Geographical Reports, 20(3): 2–13.
  35. KRAFT, S., VANČURA, M. (2009): Transport hierarchy of Czech settlement centres and its changes in the tranformation period: Geographical analysis, Moravian Geographical Reports, 17(3): 41–52.
  36. LUCAS, K., VAN WEE, B., MAAT, K. (2016): A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43(3): 473–490.10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
  37. MAIER, K., FRANKE, D. (2015): Trendy prostorové sociálně-ekonomické polarizace v Česku 2001–2011. Sociologický časopis / Sociological Review, 51(1): 89–123.10.13060/00380288.2015.51.1.155
  38. MANDERSCHEID, K. (2009): Unequal mobilities. In: Ohnmacht, T., Maksim, H., Bergman, M. M. [eds.]: Mobilities and inequality (pp. 27–50). Ashgate Publishing.
  39. MARADA, M., KVĚTOŇ, V., VONDRÁČKOVÁ, P. (2010): Doprava a geografická organizace společnosti v Česku. Edice Geographica, Praha, Česká geografická společnost.
  40. MARYÁŠ, J. (1983): K metodám výběru středisek maloobchodu a sfér jejich vlivu. Zprávy geografického ústavu ČSAV, 20(3): 61–76.
  41. MCARTHUR, D. P., KLEPPE, G., THORSEN, I., UBØE, J. (2011): The spatial transferability of parameters in a gravity model of commuting flows. Journal of Transport Geography, 19: 596–605.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.014
  42. MIKKONEN, K., LUOMA, M. (1999): The parameters of the gravity model are changing – how and why? Journal of Transport Geography, 7: 277–283.10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00024-1
  43. MULÍČEK, O. et al. (2011): POLYREG – Podpora polycentrického regionálního rozvoje. Grant WD-40-07-1. Praha, Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj.
  44. MURRAY, A. T., DAVIS, R. (2001): Equity in regional service provision. Journal of Regional Sciences, 41(4): 557–600.10.1111/0022-4146.00233
  45. NOVOTNÝ, V., FRANKE, D., POKORNÁ, I. (2008): A theoretical approach to the computation of functional accessibility. Journal of Landscape Studies, 1: 79–89.
  46. NOVOTNÝ, V. (2011): Towards the regional acupuncture: How far is too far away. Dissertation Thesis. Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences.
  47. O’FARRELL, P. N., MARKHAM, J. (1975): Commuting costs and residential location: A process of urban sprawl. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 66(2): 66–74.10.1111/j.1467-9663.1975.tb01263.x
  48. OSLAND, L., THORSEN, I. (2013): Spatial Impacts, Local Labour Market Characteristics and Housing Prices. Urban Studies, 50(10): 2063–2083.10.1177/0042098012474699
  49. PÁEZ, A., SCOTT, D. M., MORENCY, C. (2012): Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25: 141–153.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
  50. PAVLÍK, Z., KÜHNL, K. (1981): Úvod do kvantitativních metod pro geografy. Praha, SPN.
  51. REIF, B. (1973). Models in urban and regional planning. Aylesbury, Leonard Hill.
  52. ROBEŠ, M., ZEMAN, J. (2003): Strategie rozvoje železniční a související cyklistické dopravy v ČR [online]. Available at: http://www.srkd.eu/dokument/080602/Kapitoly1_5prosinec_08_aktualizace.htm
  53. RODRIGUE, J. P., COMTOIS, C., SLACK, B. (2017): The geography of transport systems. Routledge.10.4324/9781315618159
  54. ROUWENDAL, J. (1999): Spatial job search and commuting distances, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29: 491–517.10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00002-2
  55. ŘSD (ŘEDITELSTVÍ SILNIC A DÁLNIC) (2016): Záměry rozvoje silniční sítě [online]. Available at: https://www.rsd.cz/wps/wcm/connect/750816c7-fba2-43af-a2c7-c9b2784f2d56/rsd-mapa-vystavba-2016_v1_2016-02-24.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
  56. ŘSD (ŘEDITELSTVÍ SILNIC A DÁLNIC) (2013): Komunikace.
  57. SCHERSCHEL, K., STRECKEISEN, P., KRENN, M. [eds.]: (2012): Neue Prekarität: Die Folgen aktivierender Arbeitsmarktpolitik – europäische Länder im Vergleich. Frankfurt/New York, Campus-Verlag.
  58. SEIDENGLANZ, D. (2008): Geografie dopravy. In: Toušek, V., Kunc, J., Vystoupil, J. [eds.]: Ekonomická a sociální geografie (pp. 231–269). Plzeň, Aleš Čeněk.
  59. SEN, A., SMITH, T. E. (1995): Gravity models of spatial interaction behaviour. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-79880-1
  60. ŠLEGR, P. et al. (2012): Rychlá železnice i v České republice. CEDOP.
  61. SPIEKERMANN, K., WEGENER, M. (2007): Update of selected potential accessibility indicators. Final report [online]. Available at: http://www.mdrl.ro/espon_cd2/Project_Reports/Scientific_briefing_and_networking/MapUpdate_final_report.pdf
  62. SÝKORA, L., MULÍČEK, O. (2009): The micro-regional nature of functional urban areas (FUAs): Lessons from the analysis of Czech urban and regional system. Urban Research and Practice, 2(3): 287–307.10.1080/17535060903319228
  63. SÝKORA, L., MULÍČEK, O. (2012): Urbanizace a suburbanizace v Česku na počátku 21. století. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 15(5): 27–38.
  64. SŽDC (2010): Přehledná situace VRT Praha – Brno [online]. Available at: http://www.vysokorychlostni-zeleznice.cz/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/P%C5%99ehledn%C3%A1-situace_VRT_Praha_Brno_SUDOP_2010.pdf
  65. SŽDC (2014): Rychlá spojení – Interoperabilita železniční infrastruktury [online]. Available at: http://www.sizi.cz/file.php?nid=14068&oid=4665874
  66. TSE, C. Y., CHAN, A. (2003): Estimating the commuting cost and commuting time property price gradients. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33: 745–767.10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00011-5
  67. TSEKERIS, T., STATHOPOULOS, A. (2006): Gravity models for dynamic transport planning: development and implementation in urban networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 14: 152–160.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.06.009
  68. VAN WEE, B. (2001): Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. Journal of Geography, 10: 259–271.10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00041-8
  69. WELCH, T. F., MISHRA, S. (2013): A measure of equity for public transport connectivity, Journal of Transport Geography, 33: 29–41.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.007
  70. WHEELER, J. O., MULLER, P. O. (1981): Economic geography. New York, Wiley.
  71. WILSON, A. G. (1967): A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1: 253–269.10.1016/0041-1647(67)90035-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 140 - 154
Submitted on: Dec 6, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2019
Published on: Oct 7, 2019
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2019 Karel Maier, Daniel Franke, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.