Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The delimitation of areas of strategic intervention in Poland: A methodological trial and its results Cover

The delimitation of areas of strategic intervention in Poland: A methodological trial and its results

Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. BAŃSKI, J. (2001): Problem areas in Polish agriculture, Geographia Polonica, 74(1): 47–63.
  2. BAŃSKI, J., GARCIA-BLANCO, G. [eds.] (2013): European Land Use Patterns, Rural Studies, 32 Warsaw, IGSO PAS.
  3. BAŃSKI, J., MAZUR, M. (2009): Identyfikacja obszarów o silnej koncentracji problemów społecznych. In: Bański, J. [ed.]: Analiza zróżnicowania i perspektyw rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w Polsce do 2015 roku. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 16 (pp. 79–95). Warszawa, GiPZ PAN, PTG.
  4. BARCA, F. (2009): An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy [online] [cit. 01.02.2014]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/barca_en.htm
  5. BÖHME, K. (2011): Internal Summary of the Workshop on Territorial Cohesion Indicators organised by the ESPON INTERCO project 14.01.2011. ESPON INTERCO. Unpublished manuscript.
  6. CAMAGNI, R. (2008): Regional competitiveness: towards a theory of territorial capital. In: Capello, R., Camagni, R., Chizzolini, P., Frasati, R. [eds.]: Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe: European competitiveness and global strategies. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
  7. CAPELLO, R., CARAGLIU, A., NIJKAMP, P. (2009): Territorial Capital and Regional Growth: Increasing Returns in Cognitive Knowledge Use [online]. Available at: http://papers.tinbergen.nl/09059.pdf10.2139/ssrn.1443830
  8. CASTELLLS, M. (2008): The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Oxford, Wiley Blackwell.
  9. CHURSKI, P. (2010): Problem areas in Polish regional policy. Moravian Geographical Reports, 18(2): 23–35.
  10. Cohesion Policy and Germany (2014): European Commission [online] [cit. 26.02.2016]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/information/cohesion-policy-achievement-and-future-investment
  11. COPUS, A. K., DAX, T., SHUCKSMITH, M., MEREDITH, D. (2011): Cohesion Policy for rural areas after 2013: A rationale derived from the EDORA project (European Development Opportunities in Rural Areas) – ESPON 2013 Project 2013/1/2. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 113(2): 121–132.10.7896/j.1113
  12. COTELLA, G. (2006): Economic growth and territorial cohesion in CEECs: what changes for local development? Geografický časopis, 58(4): 259–277.
  13. DAMSGAARD, O., DOUCET, P., DRAHOS, Z., GERE, L., ILLÉS, L., JETMAR, M., KOMORNICKI, T., LOPEZ, L., PÉTI, M., PROKAI, R., RADVÁNSZKI, A., RICZ, J., SALAMIN, G., SCHMIDT-SEIWERT, V., SCHÖN, P., SOMFAI, A., SÜTŐ, A., TOMAY, K., VANAUTGAERDEN, L., ZAUCHA, J (2011): The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union. 2011 update. Background document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020, Budapest, Vati.
  14. EBERHARDT, P. (1989): Regiony wyludniające się w Polsce. Prace Geograficzne 148, Warsaw: IGSO PAS.
  15. EDORA (2011): European Development Oportunities in Rural Areas. Final Report. ESPON, Luxemburg.
  16. FRIEDMAN, J., ALONSO, W. (1966): Regional development and planning. Cambridge, MIT Press.
  17. FUJITA, M., KRUGMAN, P., VENABLES, A. J. (1999): The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001
  18. GAWRYSZEWSKI, A., POTRYKOWSKA, A. (1988). Rural depopulation areas in Poland. Geographia Polonica, 54: 81–100.
  19. General Report on the Activities of the European Union 2001 (2002): European Commission, Brussels – Luxembourg.
  20. HIRSCHMAN, A. (1958): The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University.
  21. HORVÁTH, G. (2012): The German Mezzogiorno? Discussion Papers, 86, Budapest, Institute of Regional Studies Research Centre for Economic and Regional Studies Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  22. KASSENBERG, A., ROLEWICZ, C. (1984). Obszary ekologicznego zagrożenia (wstępna diagnoza przestrzenna – 1980 r.). In: Gospodarka zasobami przyrody, 85: 150–155.10.1378/chest.85.2.150
  23. KLAASSEN, L. (1965): Area economic and social redevelopment: guidelines for programmes. Paris, OECD.
  24. KOKOTKIEWICZ, I. (1985): Obszary problemowe w Polsce, interpretacja z punktu widzenia zagrożeń. In: Kukliński, A. [ed.]: Gospodarka przestrzenna Polski wczoraj, dziś i jutro, 2: 84–96. Warsaw, PAX.
  25. KOMORNICKI, T., ŚLESZYŃSKI, P. (2009). Typologia obszarów wiejskich pod względem powiązań funkcjonalnych i relacji miasto-wieś. In: Bański., J. [ed.]: Analiza zróżnicowania i perspektyw rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w Polsce do 2015 roku.Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 16: 9–38. Warsaw, IGSO PAS, PTG.
  26. KOMORNICKI, T., ROSIK, P., STĘPNIAK, M., GOLISZEK, S., KOWALCZYK, K. (2015): Estimation of expected intervention results using transport accessibility measures adjusted to the needs of strategic and operational documents concerning the financial perspective 2014–2020, Report prepared by the Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences on the order of Ministry of Infrastructure and Development.
  27. Koncepcja Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2030 (2011): Warsaw, Ministry of Regional Development of the Republic of Poland.
  28. KORCELLI, P., DEGÓRSKI, M., DRZAZGA, D., KOMORNICKI, T., MARKOWSKI, T., SZLACHTA, J., ZAUCHA, J. (2010): Ekspercki projekt koncepcji przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju do roku 2033. Studia KPZK PAN, 78.
  29. Krajowa Strategia Rozwoju Regionalnego 2010–2020 (2010): Regiony, Miasta, Obszary wiejskie, Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, Warszawa.
  30. KUKLIŃSKI, A. (1983): Diagnoza stanu gospodarki przestrzennej Polski. Wstępne wyniki badań. Biuletyn KPZK PAN, 123.
  31. KULIKOWSKI, R. (1992): Obszary problemowe rolnictwa w Polsce. Wybrane zagadnienia obszarów wiejskich. Biuletyn KPZK PAN, 158: 23–40.
  32. LAGENDIJK, A. (2007). Regional anchoring and modernization strategies in non-core regions: Evidence from the UK and Germany. European Planning Studies, 7(6): 775–792.10.1080/09654319908720553
  33. LENTZ, S. [ed.]: (2010): Restructuring Eastern Germany. German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.
  34. MEDEIROS, E. (2016): Territorial Cohesion: An EU Concept, European Journal of Spatial Development, 60 [online] [cit. 18.02.2018]. Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed60.pdf
  35. NOVOTNÝ, L., MAZUR, M., EGEDY, T. (2015): Definition and delimitation of peripheries of Visegrad countries, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 39: 35–48.10.7163/SOW.39.3
  36. PERROUX, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de “pôle de croissance”. Economie Appliquée, 8(1–2): 307–320.10.3406/ecoap.1955.2522
  37. PENZÉS, J. (2013): The dimensions of peripheral areas and their restructuring in Central Europe. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 62(4): 373–386.
  38. PIKE, A., RODRIGUES-POSE, A., TOMANEY, J. (2006): Local and regional development. New York, London, Routledge.10.4324/9780203003060
  39. RAY, C. (1997): Towards a theory of the dialectic of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 27(3): 345–362.10.1111/j.1467-9523.1997.tb00055.x
  40. SCOTT, A., STORPER, M. (2003): Regions, Globalization, Development. Regional Studies, 37(6–7): 579–593.10.1080/0034340032000108697a
  41. Spatial Development and Spatial Planning in Germany (2001): Bonn, Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning.
  42. STRUBELT, W. (2010): Policy lessons from the reconstruction of East Germany – The former German Democratic Republic. In: Gorzelak, G., Bachtler, J., Smętkowski, M. [eds.]: Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe – Development Processes and Policy Challenges (pp. 71–90). London–New York, Routledge.10.4324/9780203855386-6
  43. ŚLESZYŃSKI, P. (2016): A synthetic index of the spatio-temporal accessibility of communes in Poland. Geographia Polonica, 89(4): 567–574.10.7163/GPol.0074
  44. ŚLESZYŃSKI, P., BAŃSKI, J., DEGÓRSKI, M., KOMORNICKI, T. (2017): Delimitation of problem areas in Poland. Geographia Polonica, 90(2): 131–138.10.7163/GPol.0088
  45. TONDL, G. (2001): Regional policy. In: Artis, M., Nixson, F. [eds.]: The Economics of European Union. Policy and Analysis (pp. 171–197): Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  46. TOWN (2014): Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context. Draft Final Report. Leuven, ESPON-KU.
  47. WĘCŁAWOWICZ, G., BAŃSKI, J., DEGÓRSKI, M., KOMORNICKI, T., KORCELLI, P., ŚLESZYŃSKI, P. (2006): Przestrzenne zagospodarowanie Polski na początku XXI wieku. Monografie, 6. Warsaw, IGSO PAS.
  48. ZAGOŻDŻON, A. (1988): Kilka uwag o obszarach problemowych. In: Gospodarka przestrzenna, region, lokalność. Biuletyn KPZK, 138.
  49. ZAUCHA, J., BRODZICKI, T., CIOŁEK, D., KOMORNICKI, T., MOGIŁA, Z., SZLACHTA, J., ZALESKI,, J. (2015): Terytorialny wymiar wzrostu i rozwoju. Warsaw-Sopot: Diffin, Institute of Development.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 94
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2017
|
Accepted on: Apr 16, 2018
|
Published on: Jul 4, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Jerzy Bański, Marek Degórski, Tomasz Komornicki, Przemysław Śleszyński, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.