Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Visibility and perception analysis of city monuments: The case of Bratislava city centre (Slovakia) Cover

Visibility and perception analysis of city monuments: The case of Bratislava city centre (Slovakia)

Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. AMEDEO, D., GOLLEDGE, R., STIMSON, R. (2009): Person environment behaviour research: Investigating activities and experiences in spaces and environments. New York, London, Guilford Press.
  2. APPLETON, J. (1975): The experience of landscape. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons.
  3. ASHWORTH, G., PAGE, S. J. (2011): Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes. Tourism Management, 32(1): 1–15.10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.002
  4. BATTY, M. (2001): Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1): 123–150.10.1068/b2725
  5. BAUDER, M., FREYTAG, T. (2015): Visitor mobility in the city and the effects of travel preparation. Tourism Geographies, 17(5): 682–700.10.1080/14616688.2015.1053971
  6. BELL, S. (1999): Landscape: pattern, perception and process. London, E&FN Spon.
  7. BENEDIKT, M. L. (1979): To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6(1): 47–65.10.1068/b060047
  8. BERTAMINI, M., YANG, T. L., PROFFITT, D. R. (1998): Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(4): 673–682.10.3758/BF03206054
  9. BISHOP, I. D. (2003): Assessment of visual qualities, impacts, and behaviours, in the landscape, by using measures of visibility. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(5): 677–688.10.1068/b12956
  10. CAÑAS, I., AYUGA, E., AYUGA, F. (2009): A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy, 26(4): 1173–1181.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.007
  11. CHURCH, A., COLES, T. (2007): Tourism and many faces of power. In: Church, A., Coles, Z. [eds.]: Tourism, space and power (pp. 269–283). London, New York, Routledge.10.4324/9780203392096-23
  12. DANIEL, T. C. (2001): Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(4): 267–281.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
  13. DALTON, R. C., BAFNA, S. (2003): The syntactical image of the city: a reciprocal definition of spatial syntaxes. In International Space Syntax Symposium. London. Available at: http://www.spacesyntax/symposia/SSS4/fullpapers/59DaltonBafnapapers.pdf
  14. DE FLORIANI, L., MARZANO, P., PUPPO, E. (1994): Line-of-sight communication on terrain models. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 8(4): 329–342.10.1080/02693799408902004
  15. DI LORENZO, G., READES, J., CALABRESE, F., RATTI, C. (2012): Predicting personal mobility with individual and group travel histories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(5): 838–857.10.1068/b37147
  16. EDWARDS, D., GRIFFIN, T., HAYLLAR, B. (2008): Urban tourism research: developing an agenda. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(4): 1032–1052.10.1016/j.annals.2008.09.002
  17. FISHER, P. F. (1995): An exploration of probable viewsheds in landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22(5): 527–546.10.1068/b220527
  18. FISHER-GEWIRTZMAN, D. (2016): Integrated ‘weighted views’ to quantitative 3D visibility analysis as a predictive tool for perception of space. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science https://doi.org/10.1177/026581351667648610.1177/0265813516676486
  19. FYHRI, A., JACOBSEN, J. K. S., TØMMERVIK, H. (2009): Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4): 202–211.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.002
  20. GARNERO, G., FABRIZIO, E. (2015): Visibility analysis in urban spaces: a raster-based approach and case studies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42(4): 688–707.10.1068/b130119p
  21. GRANÖ, J. G. (1929): Reine Geographie: eine methodologische Studie beleuchtet mit Beispielen aus Finnland und Estland. Helsinki, Helsingfors.
  22. GRASS DEVELOPMENT TEAM (2010): Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software, Version 6.4.0, Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Available at: http://grass.osgeo.org
  23. HLAVATÁ, Z., OŤAHEĽ, J. (2010): Visual analysis of selected historical dominants in Bratislava. Geografický časopis, 62(3): 239–311.
  24. IRA, V. (2003): The changing intra-urban structure of the Bratislava city and its perception. Geografický časopis, 55(2): 91–107.
  25. JACOBS, M. (2011): Psychology of the visual landscape. In: Nijhuis, S., et al. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape. (pp. 41–54). Delft, University of Technology.
  26. JANEČKOVÁ MOLNÁROVÁ, K., SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., KALIVODA, O., SKLENIČKA, P. (2017): Rural identity and landscape aesthetics in exurbia: Some issues to resolve from a Central Europe perspective. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28(1): 2–12.10.1515/mgr-2017-0001
  27. KIDNER, D. B., RALLINGS, P. J., WARE, A. J. (1997): Parallel processing for terrain analysis in GIS: visibility as a case study. GeoInformatica, 1(2): 183–207.10.1023/A:1009740712769
  28. LIN, T., LIN, H., HU, M. (2017): Three-dimensional visibility analysis and visual quality computation for urban open spaces aided by Google SketchUp and WebGIS. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 44(4): 618–646.10.1177/0265813515605097
  29. LLOBERA, M. (2003): Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 17(1): 25–48.10.1080/713811741
  30. LOTHIAN, A. (1999): Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44(4): 177–198.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
  31. LYNCH, K. (1960): The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  32. MEILINGER, T., FRANZ, G., BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (2012): From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps toward closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37(1): 48–62.10.1068/b34048t
  33. MORELLO, E., RATI, C. (2009): A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(5): 837–853.10.1068/b34144t
  34. NIJHUIS, S., VAN LAMMEREN, R., VAN DER HOEVEN, F. [eds.] (2011): Exploring the visual landscape. Delft, University of Technology.
  35. NIJHUIS, S. (2011): Visual research in landscape architecture. In: Nijhuis, S. Van Lammeren, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 103–146). Delft, University of Technology.
  36. NIJHUIS, S., VAN LAMMEREN, R., ANTROP, M. (2011): Exploring the visual landscape – Introduction. In: Nijhuis, S., Van Lammeren, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 15–39). Delft, University of Technology.
  37. ODE, Ĺ., TVEIT, M. S., FRY, G. (2008): Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33(1): 89–117.10.1080/01426390701773854
  38. OŤAHEĽ, J. (1999): Visual landscape perception. Landscape pattern and aesthetic assessment. Ekologia (Bratislava) 18(1): 63–74.
  39. OŤAHEĽ, J. (2003): Visual quality of the landscape: approaches to analysis. Ekologia (Bratislava), 22(Suppl. 2): 150–160.
  40. ROOS-KLEIN LANKHORST, J, DE VRIES, S., BUIS, A. (2011): Mapping landscape attractiveness – A GIS-based landscape appreciation model for the Dutch countryside. In: Nijhuis, S., Van Lammer, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 147–161). Delft, University of Technology.
  41. RØD, J. K., VAN DER MEER, D. (2009): Visibility and dominance analysis: assessing a high-rise building project in Trondheim. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(4): 698–710.10.1068/b34118
  42. SAARINEN, T. F. (1976): Environmental planning – perception and behaviour. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
  43. SEVENANT, M., ANTROP, M. (2007): Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(4): 362–374.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.004
  44. SPECTOR, R. H. (1990): Visual Fields. In: Walker, H. K., Hall, W. D., Hurst, J. W. [eds.]: Clinical Methods, 3rd edition. The history, Physical and Laboratory examination (pp. 565–572). Atlanta, Georgia, Boston, Butterwortth Publishers, Emory University School of Medicine.
  45. VAN LAMMEREN, R. (2011): Geomatics in physiognimc landscape research – A Dutch view. In: Nijhuis, S., Van Lammer, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 73–97). Delft, University of Technology.
  46. ŻEMŁA, M. (2016): Tourism destination: The networking approach. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(4): 2–14.10.1515/mgr-2016-0018
  47. ZUBE, E. H., SELL, G. L., TAYLOR, J. G. (1982): Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9: 1–33.10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 68
Submitted on: May 10, 2017
|
Accepted on: Mar 10, 2018
|
Published on: Apr 11, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Ján Oťaheľ, Vladimír Ira, Zuzana Hlavatá, Róbert Pazúr, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.