Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perceptions of Energy Crop Production by Lay People and Farmers Using the Ecosystem Services Approach Cover

Perceptions of Energy Crop Production by Lay People and Farmers Using the Ecosystem Services Approach

Moravian Geographical Reports
Volume 22 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
By: Gerd Lupp,  Olaf Bastian,  Ralf-Uwe Syrbe and  Reimund Steinhäußer  
Open Access
|Jul 2014

References

  1. Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien (2013): Potenzialatlas Bioenergie in den Bundesländern. [cit. 17.6.2013] Available at: http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/de/service/mediathek/bioenergie-bundeslaenderatlas.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. ATTESLANDER, P (2003): Methoden der empirischen. Sozialforschung. De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 411 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. BASTIAN, O, LUPP G., SYRBE, R.-U.; STEINHÄUßER, R., (2013): Energy Crops – Spatial differentiation of Risks. Ekologia, Vol. 32, No. 1, p. 13–29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BfN – Federal Agency for Nature Protection, (2009): Naturbewusstsein 2009 – Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Natur und biologischer Vielfalt. Bonn, 66 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. BfN – Federal Agency for Nature Protection, 2011. Naturbewusstsein 2011 – Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Natur und biologischer Vielfalt. Bonn, 81 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. BMBF – Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2008): Announcement of regulations for the “Sustainable land management” funding measure, Bonn.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. BMU (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety) (2011): Erneuerbare Energie in Zahlen – Internetupdate ausgewählter Daten.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bonn, Berlin. [cit. 3.7.2012] http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/ee_zahlen_internet-update.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. BMU (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety) (2010): Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Bonn, Berlin. [cit. 3.7.2012] Available at:www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/energiekonzept_bundesregierung.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. BMELV and BMU (2009): Nationaler Biomasseaktionsplan für Deutschland. Beitrag der Biomasse für eine nachhaltige Energieversorgung. Berlin, 32 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. BROWN, J., ISAAK, D. (2005): The World Cafe: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter. BK Publishers, San Francisco, 242 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Bundesregierung Deutschland (2010): Energiekonzept füreineumweltschonende, zuverlässigeund bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Berlin, Deutschland: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) und Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU) (Federal Ministry for Economy and Technology, and Federal Ministry for Environment, Conservation, and Reactor Safety), 40 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. BURGER, F. (2006): Zur Ökologie von Energiewäldern. In: Die Auswirkungen erneuerbarer Energien auf Natur und Landschaft. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 79, p. 74–80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. CHERUBINI, F., STRØMMAN, A. H. (2011): Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology, No. 102: p. 437–451.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Commission of the European Union (2007): Renewable Energy Road Map – Renewable energies in the 21st century: Building a more sustainable future. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Brussels.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. DEGENHARDT, S., HAMPICKE, U., HOLM-MÜLLER, K., JAEDICKE, W., PFEIFFER, C. (1998): ZahlungsbereitschaftfürNaturschutzprogramme. Angewandte Landschaftsökologie 25, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, xx pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Deutscher Bauernverband (2012): Der Mais – Anbau und Verwendung. [cit. 3.7.2012] Available at: http://www. bauernverband.de/mais
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Destatis: GENESIS Online Datenbank: [cit. 25.9.2013] Available at: https://www.genesis.destatis.de
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Deutsches Maiskomitee (2012): Maisanbau/Viehbesatz. Fakten, Statistik, Deutschland, [cit. 3.7.2012] Available at: http://www.maiskomitee.de/web/public/Fakten.aspx/Statistik/Deutschland/Maisanbau Viehbesatz
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. EC 2009: Directive 2009/28/EC of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. ELSASSER, P MEYERHOFF, J., MONTAGNÉ, C. &., STENGER, A. (2009). A bibliography and database on forest valuation studies from Austria, France, Germany and Switzerland – A possible base for a concerted European approach. J Forest Econ 15: p. 93–107.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Eurobarometer No. 336 (2010): Europäer, Landwirtschaft und gemeinsame Agrarpolitik (esp. p. 70) Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_336_de.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. FLEISCHER, B., SYRBE, R.-U. [eds.]: Nachhaltige Nutzung von Energiepflanzen für eine regionale Entwicklung im Landkreis Görlitz. Ein Handlungsleitfaden. Internationales Begegnungszentrum St. Marienthal (IBZ) und Leibniz-Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung Dresden (IÖR), 81 pp. [cit.25.9.2013] Available at: http://www.loebestein. de/documente/Handlungsleitfaden_web.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. FNR (Fachagentur nachwachsende Rohstoffe) (2012): Anbaufläche für nachwachsende Rohstoffe 2012 [cit. 3.7.2012] Available at: http://mediathek.fnr.de/grafiken/daten-und-fakten/anbauflache-fur-nachwachsende-rohstoffe-2012.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. HALL, R. L., ALLEN, S. J., ROSIER, P T. W., SMITH, D. M., HODNETT, M. G., ROBERTS, J. M.; HOPKINS, R., DAVIES, H. N. (1996): Hydrological effects of short rotation energy coppice. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 201 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. HEIDMANN, T., THOMSEN, A., Schelde, K. (2000): Modelling soil water dynamics in winter wheat using different estimates of canopy development. Ecological Modelling, No. 129, p. 229–243.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00238-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. HUNZIKER, M. (2000): Einstellung der Bevölkerung zu möglichen Landschaftsentwicklungen in den Alpen. Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf (CH), 157 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. KAVALOV B., PETEVES, S. D. (2005): Status and, perspectives of biomass-to-liquid fuels in the European Union. Mission of the Institute for Energy Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 126 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. LAMARQUE, P TAPPEINER, U., TURNER, C., STEINBACHER, M., BARDGETT, R. D., SZUKICS, U., SCHERMER, M., LAVOREL, S. (2011): Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Regional Environm. Change, No. 11, p. 791–804.10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Leopoldina (2011): Stellungnahme Bioenergie: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Leopoldina National Academy of Sciences. Halle, 132 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. LEE, Y. H., BÜCKMANN, W., HABER, W. (2008): Bio-Kraftstoff, Nachhaltigkeit, Naturund Bodenschutz. NuR (Natur und Recht), No. 29, p. 821–831.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. LIESEBACH, M., MULSOW, H. (2003): Der Sommervogelbestand einer Kurzumtriebsplantage, der umgebenden Feldflur und des angrenzenden Fichtenwaldes im Vergleich. Die Holzzucht, No. 54, p. 27–31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. LONDO, M., ROOSE, M., DEKKER, J., DeGRAAF, H. (2004): Willow short-rotation coppice in multiple land-use systems: evaluation of four combination options in the Dutch context. Biomass and Bioenergy, No. 27, p. 205–221.10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.01.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. LUPP G., KONOLD, W. (2008): Landscape Preferences, and Perception of Both Residents and Tourists: A Case Study in Müritz National Park (Germany). In: Siegrist, D.; Clivaz, C.; Hunziker, M.; Iten, S. [eds.]: Visitor Management in Nature-based Tourism-Strategies and Success Factors for Parks and Recreational Areas, Series of the Institute for Landscape and Open Space, HSR University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil 2, Rapperswil, p. 47–58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. LUPP R., STEINHÄUßER, R., STARICK, A., GIEß, M., BASTIAN, O., ALBRECHT, J. (2014): Forcing Germany´s renewable energy targets by increased energy crop production – A challenge for regulation to secure sustainable land use practices. Land Use Policy, No. 36, p. 296–306.10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. MARSHALL, C., ROSSMAN, G. B. (1998). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 321 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. MAYRING, P. (2000): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyze –. Grundlagen und Techniken, 7. Auflage. Beltz Deutscher Studien Verlag, Weinheim, Basel, 135 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. McLAUGHLIN, S. B., WALSH, M. E. (1998): Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy, No. 14, p. 317–324.10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10066-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. MEYERHOFF, J., ANGELI, D., HARTJE, V (2010):. Social benefits of implementing a national strategy on biological diversity in Germany. 12th Int. BIOECON Conf. “From the Wealth of Nations to the Wealth of Nature: Rethinking Economic Growth, “ Venice, Sep. 27–28, 2012. Retrieved from – http//www.bioecon. ucl.ac.uk/12th_2010/Angeli.pdf [cit. 25.9. 2013].
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. MITTELSTRASS, J. (2002): Transdisciplinarity – New Structures in Science. In: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft [ed.]: Innovative Structures in Basic (Ringberg Symposium October 4–7, 2000). Munich, p. 43–57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. MÜLLER, F., BURKHARD, B. (2007): An ecosystem based framework to link landscape structures, functions and services. In: Mander, U., Wiggering, H., Helming, K. [eds.]: Multifunctional land use – Meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, p. 37–64.10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_3
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. MÜLLER, M., JOB, H. (2009): Managing natural disturbance in protected areas: Tourists’ attitude towards the bark beetle in a German national park. Biological Conservation, No. 142, p. 375–383.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.037
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. NORGAARD, R. B. (2010): Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ., Vol. 69, No. 6: p. 1219–1227.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. RODE, M., KANNING, H. (2006): Beiträge der räumlichen Planung zur Förderung eines naturund raumverträglichen Ausbaus des energetischen Biomassepfades. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, H. 1. Bonn, p. 103–110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. ROWE, R. L., STREET, N. R., TAYLOR, G. (2009): Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the EU. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, No. 13: p. 271–290.10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. SCHRAMEK, J., OSTERBURG, B., KASPERCZYK, N., NITSCH, H., WOLFF, A., WEIS, M., HÜLEMEYER, K. (2012): Vorschläge zur Ausgestaltung von Instrumenten für einen effektiven Schutz von Dauergrünland. BfN Skript 323, Bonn-Bad-Godesberg. 112 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. SCHULZE, G. (1997):DieErlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart, 7th ed. Campus, Frankfurt, New York, 765 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. SCHWEPPE-KRAFT, B. (2009): Natural Capital in Germany – State and Valuation; with special reference to Biodiversity. In: Döring, R. [ed.]: Sustainability, natural capital and nature conservation. Marburg, 24 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Sinus Sociovision (2009): Kommunikation zur AgroBiodiversität – Voraussetzungen für und Anforderungen an eine integrierte Kommunikationsstrategie zu biologischer Vielfalt und genetischen Ressourcen in der Land-, Forst-, Fischerei-und Ernährungswirtschaft (einschließlich Gartenbau). Study for the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Affairs, 189 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Statistisches Landesamt (2012): Bevölkerung des Freistaates Sachsen am 31 Dezember 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 und 2008 bis 2011 nach Kreisfreien Städten und Landkreisen. [cit. 27.11.2012] Available at: http://www.statistik.sachsen. de/download/010_GB-Bev/02_02_01_tab.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. SEPPELT, R., FATH, B., BURKHARD, B., FISHER, J. L., GRÊT-REGAMEY, A., LAUTENBACH, S., PERTH, P., HOTES, S., SPANGENBERG, J. H., VERBURG, P H., VAN OUDENHOVEN, A. P E. (2012): Form follows. function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol. Indic., No. 21, p. 145–154.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. SRU (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen) (2007): Klimaschutz durch Biomasse. Special Report, Bonn, 48 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. TACCONI, L. (2012): Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ., No. 73, p. 29–36.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. UBA [ed.] (2009): Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten der sozialen Milieus in Deutschland. Dessau-Roßlau, 132 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. WEITH, T., SCHULZ, K., GAASCH, N., SEPPELT, R., WERNTZE, A., EPPINK, F. V (2010): Towards. integration: Sustainable land management: A new German research funding measure. Local Land & Soil News (34/35), p. 21–22.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. WOLTERING, M. (2012): ÖkonomischeEffekte vonGroßschutzgebieten. Naturschutzund Landschaftsplanung, Vol. 44, No. 11, p. 325–331.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Zensus (2011): Zensus. Internet source. [cit. 25.9.2013] Available at: https://ergebnisse.zensus2011.de/?locale=en#
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Zensuskarte 2013. Census Map. [cit. 25.9.2013] Available at: www.zensuskarte.de
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2014-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 25
Submitted on: Oct 30, 2013
|
Accepted on: Apr 30, 2014
|
Published on: Jul 29, 2014
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Energy crops,
biomass,
bioenergy,
ecosystem services,
perception,
farmers,
laypersons,
Görlitz district (Germany)
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Industries,
Environmental management,
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2014 Gerd Lupp, Olaf Bastian, Ralf-Uwe Syrbe, Reimund Steinhäußer, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)Next article