Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Public Debt Expectations: The More You Know about Public Debt, the Less Optimistic You Are Cover

Public Debt Expectations: The More You Know about Public Debt, the Less Optimistic You Are

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298021
  2. Alesina, A., Carloni, D., & Lecce, G. (2012). The electoral consequences of large fiscal adjustments. In A. Alesina, D. Carloni & G. Lecce (Eds.), Fiscal policy after the financial crisis (pp. 531-570). University of Chicago Press.
  3. Allers, M., De Haan, J., & De Kam, F. (1998). Using survey data to test for Ricardian equivalence. Public Finance Review, 26(6), 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219802600603
  4. Armantier, O., Nelson, S., Topa, G., Van der Klaauw, W., & Zafar, B. (2016). The price is right: Updating inflation expectations in a randomized price information experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 503-523.
  5. Beckmann, E., & Stix, H. (2015). Foreign currency borrowing and knowledge about exchange rate risk. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 112, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.015
  6. Badarinza, C., & Buchmann, M. (2009, September). Inflation perceptions and expectations in the euro area: the role of news (Working Paper No. 1088). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/153522/1/ecbwp1088.pdf
  7. Brender, A., & Drazen, A. (2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2203-20. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.2203
  8. Bruine de Bruin, W., van der Klaauw, W., & Topa, G. (2011, April). Expectations of inflation: The biasing effect of thoughts about specific prices (Staff Report No. 489). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60790/1/656136790.pdf
  9. Cavallo, A., Cruces, G., & Perez-Truglia, R. (2017). Inflation expectations, learning, and supermarket prices: Evidence from survey experiments. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(3), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20150147
  10. Choi, E., & Woo, J. (2010). Political corruption, economic performance, and electoral outcomes: A cross-national analysis. Contemporary Politics, 16(3), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2010.501636
  11. Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550
  12. D’Acunto, F., Hoang, D., & Weber, M. (2018, May). Unconventional fiscal policy (Working Paper No. 108). https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181061
  13. De Simone, E., Cicatiello, L., Gaeta, G. L., & Pinto, M. (2022). Expectations about future economic prospects and satisfaction with democracy: Evidence from European countries during the COVID-19 crisis. Social Indicators Research, 159(3), 1017-1033.
  14. Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Hilscher, J., Raviv, A., & Reis, R. (2022). Inflating away the public debt? An empirical assessment. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(3), 1553-1595. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab018
  16. Karadja, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Seim, D. (2017). Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 201-212.
  17. Kuziemko, I., Norton, M. I., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1478-1508. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130360
  18. Lewis-Beck, C., & Martini, N. F. (2020). Economic perceptions and voting behavior in US presidential elections. Research & Politics, 7(4), 2053168020972811. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020972811
  19. Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2013). The VP-function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice, 157(3), 367-385.
  20. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R., & Elias, A. (2008). Economics, party, and the vote: Causality issues and panel data. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x
  21. Lin, C. A., & Bates, T. C. (2022). Smart people know how the economy works: Cognitive ability, economic knowledge and financial literacy. Intelligence, 93, 101667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101667
  22. Lockerbie, B. (1991). Prospective economic voting in U. S. House elections, 1956-88. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.2307/439980
  23. Loveless, M., & Binelli, C. (2020). Economic expectations and satisfaction with democracy: evidence from Italy. Government and Opposition, 55(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.31
  24. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2017). How ordinary consumers make complex economic decisions: Financial literacy and retirement readiness. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 7(03), 1750008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139217500082
  25. Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2016). Learning from inflation experiences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 53-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv037
  26. Manski, C. F. (2004). Measuring expectations. Econometrica, 72(5), 1329-1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00537.x
  27. Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x
  28. Markus, G. B. (1988). The impact of personal and national economic conditions on the presidential vote: A pooled cross-sectional analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111314
  29. Mayer, T. (1995). Doing economic research. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  30. Nadeau, R., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2001). National economic voting in US presidential elections. The Journal of Politics, 63(1), 159-181.
  31. Roth, C., Settele, S., & Wohlfart, J. (2020). Beliefs about public debt and the demand for government spending. Journal of Econometrics, 231(1), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.011
  32. Seyd, B. (2015). How do citizens evaluate public officials? The role of performance and expectations on political trust. Political Studies, 63(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12163
  33. Shapiro, M. D., & Slemrod, J. (2009). Did the 2008 tax rebates stimulate spending?. American Economic Review, 99(2), 374-79. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.374
  34. Streeck, W. (2014). The politics of public debt: Neoliberalism, capitalist development and the restructuring of the state. German economic review, 15(1), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12032
  35. Walstad, W. B., & Rebeck, K. (2002). Assessing the economic knowledge and economic opinions of adults. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 42(5), 921-935.
  36. Wobker, I., Lehmann-Waffenschmidt, M., Kenning, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012, October). What do people know about the economy? A test of minimal economic knowledge in Germany (Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 03/12). https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/67721/1/732597579.pdf
  37. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00609
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2023-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2392-8042 | Journal ISSN: 2286-2668
Language: English
Page range: 190 - 207
Submitted on: May 2, 2023
Accepted on: May 28, 2023
Published on: Jun 19, 2023
Published by: Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Cecilia Ciocîrlan, Andreea Stancea, Valentin Stoica, published by Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.