Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of International Law Concept of Commercial Usages in Latvia Cover

Development of International Law Concept of Commercial Usages in Latvia

By: Jelena Alfejeva  
Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Berger, Klaus. “Force Majeure Clauses and Their Relationship with the Applicable Law, Trade Usages and General Principles of Law.” In Hardship and Force Majeure in International Commercial Contracts, Dossier XVIII, 133–56. 2018.
  2. Cafaggi, Fabrizio. “The Many Features of Transnational Private Rule-Making: Unexplored Relationships between Custom, Jura Mercatorum and Global Private Regulation.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 36, no. 4 (2015): 875–938.
  3. Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 Concerning Unfair Business-to-Consumer Commercial Practices in the Internal Market and Amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive) (Text with EEA Relevance). Official Journal of the European Union L 149, June 11, 2005, 22–39. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2005/29/oj.
  4. Garner, Bryan A. Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  5. Goode, Roy. “Usage and Its Reception in Transnational Commercial Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 46, no. 1 (1997): 19, 25–27.
  6. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Accessed January 1, 2025. https://iccwbo.org/.
  7. International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). Accessed January 1, 2025. https://www.unidroit.org/.
  8. Judgment of the Riga District Court of December 8, 2022, in case C68456921.
  9. Judgment of the Riga District Court of February 21, 2017, in case C33542715.
  10. Judgment of the Riga District Court of January 11, 2024, in case C68310220.
  11. Judgment of the Riga District Court of January 18, 2021, in case C33601418.
  12. Judgment of the Riga District Court of June 9, 2020, in case C29301719.
  13. Judgment of the Riga District Court of October 16, 2017, in case C33540215.
  14. Judgment of the Riga District Court of September 9, 2021, in case C29301719.
  15. Kārkliņš, Jānis. “Vainas, prettiesiskas rīcības un atbildības ideja privāttiesībās.” Juridiskā zinātne: Latvijas Universitātes žurnāls, no. 8 (2015): 156.
  16. Király, Miklós. The Unification of Contract Law and Commercial Usages. 2022. https://doi.org/10.26494/tclr220225.
  17. Lando, Ole, Antonius Prüm, Eric Clive, and Reinhard Zimmermann. Principles of European Contract Law, Part III. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2003.
  18. Latvia. Civillikums [Civil Law]. Law of the Republic of Latvia, adopted January 28, 1937. Valdības Vēstnesis 41, February 20, 1937.
  19. Latvia. Konkurences likums [Competition Law]. Law of the Republic of Latvia, adopted October 4, 2001. Latvijas Vēstnesis 151, October 23, 2001; Latvijas Republikas Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Ziņotājs 22, November 22, 2001.
  20. Latvia. Komerclikums [Commercial Law]. Law of the Republic of Latvia, adopted April 13, 2000. Latvijas Vēstnesis 158/160, May 4, 2000; Latvijas Republikas Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Ziņotājs 11, June 1, 2000.
  21. Latvia. Par Apvienoto Nāciju Organizācijas Konvenciju par starptautiskajiem preču pirkuma-pārdevuma līgumiem [On the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods]. Law of the Republic of Latvia, adopted June 19, 1997. Latvijas Vēstnesis 170, July 3, 1997; Latvijas Republikas Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Ziņotājs 15, August 7, 1997.
  22. Loebers, Augusts. Tirdzniecības tiesību pārskats. Rīga: Valtera un Rapas, 1926.
  23. Margene, Ozolniece. “Saprātīgums kā visu lietu mērs jurisprudencē.” Jurista Vārds, no. 29 (1347), July 16, 2024: 15–29.
  24. Mistelis, Loukas. “Is Harmonisation a Necessary Evil? The Future of Harmonisation and New Sources of International Trade Law.” In Foundations and Perspectives of International Trade Law, 3–27. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001.
  25. Principles of European Contract Law (PECL). Accessed January 1, 2025. http://www.trans-lex.org/principles.
  26. Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia. Summary of Case Law. Accessed January 1, 2025. https://www.at.gov.lv/files/uploads/files/6_Judikatura/Tiesu_prakses_apkopojumi/2019/konkurences%20lietu%20apkopojums%2021_03_2019.docx.
  27. UNIDROIT. UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. Rome: UNIDROIT, 2016. https://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/principles2016-e.pdf.
  28. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Accessed January 1, 2025. https://uncitral.un.org/en/about.
  29. Vogenauer, Stefan, ed. Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC). 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Language: English
Published on: Nov 25, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Jelena Alfejeva, published by Polish Economic Security Foundation. Institute for Legal and Economic Dialogue and Analysis
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT