References
- Bryson, Joanna. 2010. Robots Should Be Slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues (pp. 63–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2010a. Moral Appearances: Emotions, Robots, and Human Morality. Ethics and Information Technology 12(3): 235–241.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2010b. Robot Rights? Towards a Social-Relational Justification of Moral Consideration. Ethics and Information Technology 12(3): 209–221.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2011a. Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations. Philosophy & Technology 24(3): 269–278.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2011b. You, Robot: On the Linguistic Construction of Artificial Others. AI & Society 26(1): 61–69.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2012. Growing Moral Relations: Critique of Moral Status Ascription. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2014. The Moral Standing of Machines: Towards a Relational and Non-Cartesian Moral Hermeneutics. Philosophy & Technology 27(1): 61–77.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2017. Using Words and Things: Language and Philosophy of Technology. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
- Coeckelbergh, Mark and Gunkel, David. 2014. Facing Animals: A Relational, Other-Oriented Approach to Moral Standing. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27(5): 715–733.
- Darling, Kate. 2012. Extending Legal Protection to Social Robots. IEEE Spectrum 10 Sept 2012. Retrieved 22 June 2017 from http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/extending-legal-protection-to-social-robots.
- Darling, Kate. 2017. ‘Who’s Johnny?’ Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy. Robot Ethics S 2.0, eds. P. Lin, G. Bekey, K. Abney, R. Jenkins, Oxford University Press.
- Floridi, Luciano and Sanders, J.W. 2004. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14(3): 349–379.
- Gunkel, David. 2012. The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gunkel, David. 2017. The Other Question: Can and Should Robots Have Rights? Ethics and Information Technology (online first). DOI 10.1007/s10676–017–9442–4.10.1007/s1067601794424
- Johnson, Deborah G. 2006. Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4): 195–204.
- Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Lectures on Ethics, eds. P. Heath and J.B. Schneewind. Trans. P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kant, Immanuel. 2012. Lectures on Anthropology, eds. A.W. Wood and R.B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Astrid M., Krämer, Nicole C., Hoffmann, Laura, Sobieray, Sabrina, and Sabrina C. Eimler. 2013. An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics. 5: 17–34.
- Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: The Penguin Press.
- Suzuki et al. 2015. Measuring Empathy for Human and Robot Hand Pain Using Electroencephalography. Nature, Scientific Reports 5.
- Whitby, Blay. 2008. Sometimes It’s Hard to Be a Robot: A Call for Action on the Ethics of Abusing Artificial Agents. Interaction with Computers 20: 338–341.
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, eds and trans: Hacker PMS, Schulte J. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.