Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences Cover
By: Rui Sampaio  
Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Andersen, H., 2012, The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation, Synthese, 189, 415–432.10.1007/s11229-011-9965-x
  2. Bechtel, W., 2008, Mental Mechanisms, London, Routledge.10.4324/9780203810095
  3. Bechtel, W. and Wright, C., 2009. What is psychological explanation? In: J. Symons and P. Calvo (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology, London, Routledge, 113–130.10.4324/9780429244629-8
  4. Craver, C. and Darden, L., 2013, In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226039824.001.0001
  5. Craver, C., 2007, Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience, Oxford, Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299317.003.0007
  6. Craver, C. and Bechtel, W., 2007, Top-down causation without top-down causes, Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.10.1007/s10539-006-9028-8
  7. Cartwright, N., 2002, Against modularity, the causal Markov Condition and any link between the two, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 411–453.10.1093/bjps/53.3.411
  8. Crick, F., 1988, What Mad Pursuit, New York, Basic Books.
  9. Cummins, R., 2000, How does it work? versus what are the laws?: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In: F. Keil and R. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 117–144.10.7551/mitpress/2930.003.0009
  10. Davidson, D., 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Clarendon.
  11. Earman, J., Roberts, J. and Smith, S., 2002, Ceteris paribus lost, Erkenntnis, 57, 281–301.10.1023/A:1021526110200
  12. Elster, J., 2015, Explaining Social Behaviour: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107763111
  13. Elster, J., 1983a, Sour Grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press – Paris, Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.10.1017/CBO9781139171694
  14. Elster, J., 1983b, Explaining Technical Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  15. Glennan, S., 2017, The New Mechanical Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198779711.001.0001
  16. Glennan, S., 2010, Ephemeral mechanisms and historical explanation, Erkenntnis, 72, 251–266.10.1007/s10670-009-9203-9
  17. Glennan, S., 2002, Rethinking mechanistic explanation, Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.10.1086/341857
  18. Roux, S., 2018, From the mechanical philosophy to early modern mechanisms, in S. Glennann, and P. Illari, The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, New York and London, Routledge, 26–45.10.4324/9781315731544-3
  19. Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., 2009, What is analytical sociology all about? In: The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3–24.
  20. Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R., 1998, Introduction. In: Social Mechanisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1–32.10.1017/CBO9780511663901.001
  21. Hedström, P. and Udehn, L., 2009, Analytical sociology and theories of the middle range. In: P. Hedström and P. Bearman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 25–47.
  22. Hempel, C., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York, The Free Press.
  23. Illari, P. and Williamson, J., 2012, What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2,119–135.10.1007/s13194-011-0038-2
  24. Kincaid, H., 1996, Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  25. Malinowski, B., 1935, Coral Gardens and Their Magic, New York, American Book Co.
  26. Norkus, Z., 2005, Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the “mechanismic approach” in social science and history, History and Theory, 44, 348–372.10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00329.x
  27. Pietroski, P. and Rey, G., 1995. “When other things aren’t equal: saving ceteris paribus laws from vacuity”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 81–110.10.1093/bjps/46.1.81
  28. Rasler, K. and Thompson, W., 2004, The democratic peace and a sequential, reciprocal, causal arrow hypothesis, Comparative Political Studies, 37, 879–908.10.1177/0010414004267980
  29. Risjord, M., 2014, Philosophy of Social Science, New York and London, Routledge.10.4324/9780203802540
  30. Rousseau, D., Gelpi, C, Reiter, D. and Huth, P. 1996, Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918–88, The American Political Science Review, 90, 512–533.10.2307/2082606
  31. Russo, F., and Williamson, J., 2007, Interpreting causality in the health sciences, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21, 157–170.10.1080/02698590701498084
  32. Steel, D., 2008, Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science, Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331448.001.0001
  33. Von Wright, G. H., 1971, Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.
  34. Woodward, J., 2002, What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account, Philosophy of Science, 69, S366–S377.10.1086/341859
  35. Wright, C. and Bechtel, W., 2007, Mechanisms and psychological explanations. In: P. Thagard (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 31–79.10.1016/B978-044451540-7/50019-0
  36. Zahle, J., 2016, Methodological holism in the social sciences. In: E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at:<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/holism-social/>.10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0738
Language: English
Page range: 64 - 88
Published on: Aug 20, 2018
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2018 Rui Sampaio, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.