Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Explanation by Idealized Theories Cover
Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Bangu, Sorin (2015), “Why Does Water Boil? Fictions in Scientific Explanation”, in Uskali Mäki et al. (eds.), Recent Developments in Philosophy of Science, Springer, Cham, 319–330.10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_24
  2. Batterman, Robert W. (2002), The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/0195146476.003.0004
  3. Batterman, Robert W. and Rice, Collin C. (2014), “Minimal Model Explanations”, Philosophy of Science 81, 349–376.10.1086/676677
  4. Bokulich, Alisa (2011), “How Scientific Models Can Explain”, Synthese 180, 33–45.10.1007/s11229-009-9565-1
  5. Bokulich, Alisa (2012), “Distinguishing Explanatory from Nonexplanatory Fictions”, Philosophy of Science 79, 725–737.10.1086/667991
  6. Bokulich, Alisa (2017), “Models and Explanation”, in Lorenzo.Magnani and Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, Springer, Dordrecht, 103–118.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_4
  7. Brzezinski, Jerzy et al. (eds) (2007), The Courage of Doing Philosophy: Essays Presented to Leszek Nowak, Rodopi, Amsterdam.10.1163/9789401205368
  8. Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001
  9. Cevolani, Gustavo, Crupi, Vicenzo & Festa, Roberto (2011), “Verisimilitude and Belief Change for Conjunctive Theories”, Erkenntnis 75, 183–202.10.1007/s10670-011-9290-2
  10. Craver, Carl E. (2006). “When Mechanistic Models Explain”. Synthese 153, 355–376.10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x
  11. Duhem, Pierre (1954), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9780691233857
  12. Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Machete, Reason & Smith, Leonard (2013), “Probabilistic Forecasting: Why Model Imperfection Is a Poison Pill”, in Hanne Andersen et al. (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, Springer, Dordrecht, 479–491.10.1007/978-94-007-5845-2_39
  13. Hempel, Carl G. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.
  14. Hempel, Carl G. (1966), Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  15. Hindriks, Frank (2008), “False Models as Explanatory Engines”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38, 334–360.10.1177/0048393108319414
  16. Hindriks, Frank (2013), “Explanation, Understanding, and Unrealistic Models”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, 523–531.10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.12.004
  17. Krajewski, Wladislaw (1977), Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-010-1178-5
  18. Kuipers, Theo (2000), From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism, Kluwer, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-017-1618-5
  19. Lange, Marc (2015), “On ‘Minimal Model Explanations’: A Reply to Batterman and Rice”, Philosophy of Science 82, 292–305.10.1086/680488
  20. Liu, Chang (1999), “Approximation, Idealization, and Laws of Nature”, Synthese 118, 229–256.10.1023/A:1005186322310
  21. Mäki, Uskali (1994), “Isolation, Idealization and Truth in Economics”, in Bert Hamminga and Neil De Marchi (eds.), Idealization in Economics, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 147–168.
  22. Mäki, Uskali (2009), “MISSing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems”, Erkenntnis 70, 29–43.10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9
  23. McMullin, Ernan (1985), “Galilean Idealizations”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16, 247–273.10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2
  24. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1987), Truthlikeness, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-3739-0
  25. Niiniluoto, Ilkka. (1989), “Theories, Approximations, Idealizations”, in Jerzy Brzezinski et al. (eds.), Idealization I: General Problems, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 9–57.
  26. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1999), Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  27. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2002), “Truthlikeness and Economic Theories”, in Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social Construction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 214–228,10.1017/CBO9780511493317.011
  28. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2005), “Abduction and Truthlikeness”, in Roberto Festa et al. (eds.), Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth Approximation, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 255–275.
  29. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2013), “Models, Simulations, and Analogical Inference”, in Vassilios Karakostas & Dennis Dieks (eds.), EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, Springer International, Cham, 19–27.10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_2
  30. Nowak, Leszek (1971), “The Problem of Explanation in Karl Marx’s Capital”, Quality and Quantity 5, 311–330.10.1007/BF00218986
  31. Nowak, Leszek (1972), “Laws of Science, Theories, and Measurement”, Philosophy of Science 39, 533–548.10.1086/288479
  32. Nowak, Leszek (1980), The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
  33. Peirce, Charles S. (1931–35), Collected Papers 1–6, ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA: (CP)
  34. Popper, Karl R. (1972), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Account, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  35. Rohwer, Yasha & Rice, Collin (2013), “Hypothetical Pattern Idealization and Explanatory Models”, Philosophy of Science 80, 334–355.10.1086/671399
  36. Rudner, Richard (1966), Philosophy of Social Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  37. Rueger, Alexander & Sharp, W. David (1996), “Simple Theories of a Messy World: Truth and Explanatory Power in Nonlinear Dynamics”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 93–112.10.1093/bjps/47.1.93
  38. Salmon, Wesley C. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  39. Sellars, Wilfrid (1963), Science, Perception, and Reality, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
  40. Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (1989), “Idealized Laws, Antirealism, and Applied Science: A Case in Hydrogeology”, Synthese 81, 329–351.10.1007/BF00869320
  41. Strevens, Michael (2008). Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  42. Tuomela, Raimo (1979), “Scientific Change and Approximation”, in Ilkka Niiniluoto & Raimo Tuomela (eds.), The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 265–297.
  43. van Fraassen, Bas (1980), The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
  44. Wayne, Andrew (2011), “Expanding the Scope of Explanatory Idealization”, Philosophy of Science 78, 830–841.10.1086/662277
  45. Weisberg, Michael (2007), “Three Kinds of Scientific Idealizations”, Journal of Philosophy 104, 639–659.10.5840/jphil20071041240
  46. Weisberg, Michael (2013), “Getting Serious about Similarity”, Philosophy of Science 79, 785–794.10.1086/667845
  47. Winsberg, Eric (2010), Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226902050.001.0001
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 63
Published on: Aug 20, 2018
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2018 Ilkka Niiniluoto, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.