Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Ethics of AI-Assisted Academic Writing. Authenticity Criteria in the Evaluation of Students’ Assignments Cover

The Ethics of AI-Assisted Academic Writing. Authenticity Criteria in the Evaluation of Students’ Assignments

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Allen, C., Smit, I., & Wallach, W. (2005). Artificial morality: Topdown, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3), 149–155.
  2. European Commission. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on AI, 2019, available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/196377/AI%20HLEG_Ethics%20Guidelines%20for%20Trustworthy%20AI.pdf.
  3. European Commission. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on AI, 2019, available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/196377/AI%20HLEG_Ethics%20Guidelines%20for%20Trustworthy%20AI.pdf, p. 12.
  4. European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on artificial intelligence. Official Journal of the European Union, L 1689, 12 July 2024. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng.
  5. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People. Retrieved from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-PREX23-PURL-gpo193638/pdf/GOVPUB-PREX23-PURL-gpo193638.pdf.
  6. U.S. Congress. (2022). Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/6580.
  7. State Council of China. (2017). New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan. Retrieved from https://flia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/A-New-Generation-of-Artificial-Intelligence-Development-Plan-1.pdf.
  8. Cyberspace Administration of China. (2021). Administrative Provisions on Recommendation Algorithms in Internet-based Information Services Retrieved from: https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/translation-internet-information-service-algorithmic-recommendation-management-provisions-effective-march-1-2022/.
  9. World Intellectual Property Organization. Generative Artificial Intelligence: Patent Landscape Report. Geneva: WIPO, 2024 Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/patent-landscape-report-generative-artificial-intelligence-genai/en/index.html.
  10. Korean Copyright Commission. (2024). A Guide on Generative AI and Copyright, p.40 Retrieved from https://www.korea.net/Government/Briefing-Room/Press-Releases/view?articleId=391&insttCode=A260123&type=N.
  11. Japan Copyright Office. (2024). General Understanding on AI and Copyright in Japan, p.17 Retrieved from https://www.bunka.go.jp/english/policy/copyright/pdf/94055801_01.pdf.
  12. Council of the European Union. (2024). Policy questionnaire on the relationship between generative Artificial Intelligence and copyright and related rights – Revised Presidency summary of the Member States contributions, p.3. Retrieved from https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16710-2024-REV-1/en/pdf.
  13. Williams, J. P., & Vannini, P. (2009). Authenticity in Culture, Self, and Society. Routledge, p.3. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315261973.
  14. Ferrara, A. (2008). The Force of the Example. Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press, p.3
  15. Jacobs, D. T. (2008). The Authentic Dissertation: Alternative Ways of Knowing, Research and Representation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870501.
Language: English
Page range: 155 - 158
Published on: Jul 5, 2025
Published by: Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Oana-Antonia Ilie, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.