References
- Batty, M. (2018). Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), 817-820.
- Juarez, M. G., Botti, V. J., & Giret, A. S. (2021). Digital twins: Review and challenges. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 21(3), 030802.
- Dawson, M. (2018). Cyber security in industry 4.0: The pitfalls of having hyperconnected systems. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(1), 19-28.
- CISA (n.d.). Critical manufacturing sector Retrieved from https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/critical-manufacturing-sectore Security Agency CISA
- Ferko, M., et al. (2023). Standardisation in Digital Twin Architectures in Manufacturing. IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA), L’Aquila, Italy, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA56044.2023.00015
- Miller, D. C. Rowe, A survey scada of and critical infrastructure incidents., RIIT 12 (2012) 51–56.
- Cárdenas, A. A., Amin, S., Lin, Z. S., Huang, Y. L., Huang, C. Y., & Sastry, S. (2011, March). Attacks against process control systems: risk assessment, detection, and response. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM symposium on information, computer and communications security (pp. 355–366). ACM.
- Chahid, Y., Benabdellah, M., & Azizi, A. (2017, April). Internet of things security. In 2017 International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
- Creery, A., & Byres, E. J. (2005, September). Industrial cybersecurity for power system and SCADA networks. In Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference, 2005. Industry Applications Society 52nd Annual (pp. 303–309). IEEE.
- Aljawarneh, S. A., Alawneh, A., & Jaradat, R. (2017). Cloud security engineering: Early stages of SDLC. Future Generation Computer Systems, 74, 385–392.
- Ani, U. P. D., He, H., & Tiwari, A. (2017). Review of cybersecurity issues in industrial critical infrastructure: manufacturing in perspective. Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 1(1), 32-74.
- Shao, G. (2023, September). Manufacturing Digital Twin Standards. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (pp.370-377)
- Attaran, M., & Celik, B. G. (2023). Digital Twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165
- Sharma, A., Kosasih, E., Zhang, J., Brintrup, A., & Calinescu, A. (2022). Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30, 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383
- Sharma, A., Kosasih, E., Zhang, J., Brintrup, A., & Calinescu, A. (2022). Digital Twinds: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30, 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383
- Shao, G. (2021). Use Case Scenarios for Digital Twin Implementation Based on ISO 23247. Advanced Manufacturing Series (NIST AMS), National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.400-2
- Attaran, M., & Celik, B. G. (2023). Digital Twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165
- Shao, G., & Helu, M. (2023a). Framework for A Digital Twin in Manufacturing: Scope and Requirements. Manufacturing Letters, 24, 105-107.
- Shao, G. (2023b, September). Manufacturing Digital Twin Standards. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (pp.370-377).
- International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 23247-1: Automation systems and integration — Digital twin framework for manufacturing — Part 1: Overview and general principles.
- International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO/IEC 30173: Digital twin, Concepts and terminology.
- International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC TR 30172: Internet of Things (IoT). Digital twin. Use cases. https://www.iso.org/standard/81578.html
- International Electrotechnical Commission. (2023). IEC 63278-1:2023 ED1 Asset Administration Shell for industrial applications - Part 1: Asset Administration Shell structure. https://www.iec.ch/dyn/www/f?p=103:38:25763300038578::::FSP_ORG_ID,FSP_APEX_PAGE,FSP_PROJECT_ID:1250,23,103536
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2019). IEEE-P2806 System architecture of digital representation for physical objects in factory environments. https://standards.ieee.org/project/2806.html
- MTConnect Institute. (2022). MTConnect standardizes factory device data. https://www.mtconnect.org/
- OPC Foundation. (2023). OPC-UA services specification. https://opcfoundation.org/developer-tools/specifications-unified-architecture
- International Organization for Standardization (2021). ISO 10303: Industrial automation systems and integration - product data representation and exchange - Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles. https://www.iso.org/standard/72237.html
- International Organization for Standardization (2020). ISO 23952: Automation Systems and Integration – Quality Information Framework (QIF) - An Integrated Model for Manufacturing Quality Information. https://www.iso.org/standard/77461.html
- Lin, S., Kym Watson, K., Shao, G., Stojanovic, L. & Zarkout, B. (2023). Digital twin core conceptual models and services. Industry IoT Consortium. Retrieved https://www.iiconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/10/Digital-Twin-Core-Conceptual-Models-and-Services_20231102.pdf
- Boss, B., Malakuti, S., Lin, S.-W., Usländer, T., Clauer, E., Hoffmeister, M., & Stojanovic, L. (2020). Digital Twin and Asset Administration Shell Concepts and Application in the Industrial Internet and Industrie 4.0, an Industrial Internet Consortium and Plattform Industrie 4.0 Joint White paper. https://www.iiconsortium.org/pdf/Digital-Twin-and-Asset-Administration-Shell-Concepts-and-Application-Joint-Whitepaper.pdf
- Wallner, B., Zwölfer, B., Trautner, T., & Bleicher, F. (2023). Digital Twin Development and Operation of a Flexible Manufacturing Cell using ISO 23247. Procedia CIRP, 120, 1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.09.140
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023). Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins. National Academies Press. http://nap.nationalacademies.org/26894
- Fischer, O. P., Matlik, J., Schindel, W., French, M., Kabir, M., Ganguli, J., Hardwick, M., Arnold, S., Byar, A., Lewe, J.-H., Mahadevan, S., Duncan, S., Dong, J., Kinard, D., & Maiaru, M. (2022). Digital Twin: Reference Model, Realizations, and Recommendations. https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12373
- Denning, D. E. (2012). Stuxnet: What has changed? Future Internet, 4(3), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4030672
- Munro, K. (2012). Deconstructing Flame: The limitations of traditional defences. Computer Fraud & Security, 2012(10), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(12)70103-4
- Bhattacharjee, S., Salimitari, M., Chatterjee, M., Kwiat, K., & Kamhoua, C. (2017, November). Preserving data integrity in IoT networks under opportunistic data manipulation. In 2017 IEEE DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech (pp. 446–453). https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC-PICom-DataCom-CyberSciTec.2017.86
- Copos, B., Levitt, K., Bishop, M., & Rowe, J. (2016, May). Is anybody home? Inferring activity from smart home network traffic. IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2016.44
- Robles, R. J., Choi, M. K., Cho, E. S., Kim, S. S., Park, G., & Lee, J. (2008). Common threats and vulnerabilities of critical infrastructures. International Journal of Control and Automation, 1(1), 17–22.
- Lewis, J. A. (2002). Assessing the risks of cyber terrorism, cyber war and other cyber threats. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
- Lichtman, M., Rao, R., Marojevic, V., Reed, J., & Jover, R. P. (2018, May). 5G NR jamming, spoofing, and sniffing: Threat assessment and mitigation. In 2018 IEEE ICC Workshops, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCW.2018.8403660
- Ge, X., Ye, J., Yang, Y., & Li, Q. (2016). User mobility evaluation for 5G small cell networks based on individual mobility model. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(3), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2016.2525639
- Wilson, C. (2014). Cyber Threats to Critical Information Infrastructure. In Cyberterrorism (pp. 123–136)
- Dawson, M (2018). Cybersecurity in Industry 4.0: The pitfalls of having hyperconnected systems. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(1), 19–28.
- Dawson, M., Bacius, R., Gouveia, L. B., & Vassilakos, A. (2021). Understanding the Challenge of Cybersecurity in Critical Infrastructure Sectors. Land Forces Academy Review, Vol. XXVI, No. 1(101), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2021-0011
- Gaia, J., Sanders, G.L., Sanders, S.P. Upadhyaya, S., Wang, X., & Yoo, C.W. (2021). Dark traits and hacking potential. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 21(3), 23-46.