Legal Balance between the Human Rights Protection and the Effectiveness of the Criminal Investigation
References
- [1] Papucharova, G. Short profiles of different European Investigation order domestic regulations in the European Union, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balcescu”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 25, Issue 2, 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2019-0075, pp. 169-175.10.2478/kbo-2019-0075
- [2] Girginov, A., Voynova, R. Bulgarian-English Handbook on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, ISBN 978-619-198-068-0, C., Новазвезда, 2017.
- [3] The so-called Council of Europe Convention of Budapest (CETS № 185) establishes the primary international mechanisms for cooperation in combating and investigating cybercrime by requiring the parties to adopt special legal procedures for obtaining, resp. providing electronic evidence that is not limited to cybercrime.
- [4] Such as Art. 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Art.17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Art.8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Art.7-8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
- [5] Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1–22).
- [6] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88).
- [7] Belova, G., Georgieva, G. New Data Protection Development in the EU Judicial and Criminal Area, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balchesku”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 23, Issue 2, 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0103, pp.147-148.10.1515/kbo-2017-0103
- [8] Кръстева, Н. Наказателноправназакриланадетето: предизвикателства в съвременнататехнологичнасреда, С.,ВедаСловена-Ж, 2019.
- [9] See Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 Digital Rights Ireland, Judgment of 8 April 2014, and Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15 Tele2 Sverigeand Tom Watson, Judgment of 21 December 2016.
- [10] Stanin, M., Rights within Obligations and Responsibilities, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balcescu”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 22, Issue 2, 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2016-0064, p. 150.10.1515/kbo-2016-0064
- [11] See Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on improving criminal justice in cyberspace, ST9579/16.
- [12] Procedure numbers of the Proposals of EC:COM/2018/225 final - 2018/0108(COD) and COM/2018/226 final - 2018/0107 (COD).
- [13] See Jaloud v. Netherlands (GC), a. no.47708/08: “143. Furthermore, the fact of executing a decision or an order given by an authority of a foreign State is not in itself sufficient to relieve a Contracting State of the obligations which it has taken upon itself under the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, § 40, ECHR 2001-VIII, and K. v. Italy, no. 38805/97, § 21, ECHR 2004-VIII).”
- [14] Tosza, S. The European Commission’s Proposal on Cross-Border Access to E-Evidence Overview and Critical Remarks, in: EUCRIM, Issue 4/2018, pp. 212-219.10.30709/eucrim-2018-021
- [15] Chankova, D., Voynova, R. Towards New European Regulation for Handling Electronic Evidence, in: US-China Law Review, ISSN: 1548-6605 (Print), 1930-2061 (Online), Volume 15, № 3, 2018, р. 125.10.17265/1548-6605/2018.03.001
- [16] See Judgment of the CJEU in Case C-207/16, concerning Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector.
- [17] Marin, N., Kovacheva, D., Legal Problems and Decisions in the Cooperation between National Ombudsmen in South-East Europe (Правнипроблеми и решенияприсътрудничествотомеждунационалнитеомбудсмани в ЮгоизточнаЕвропа), сп. Балканистиченфорум, бр. 2/2019 г., ISSN 1310-3970 (Print), 2535-1265 (Online), ЮЗУ„НеофитРилски“, Благоевград, с. 306.
- [18] Андонова, Г. Възникване и развитие на престъпността и наказанията в минали и наши дни, в: ел. списание „Право, политика, администрация“, ISSN 2367-4601, Правно-исторически факултет, ЮЗУ “Неофит Рилски“, Благоевград, том 3, бр. 3, 2016 г., с. 2-14.
- [19] Stanin, M., The Contemporary Countries in the Conditions of Migratory Multiculturalism, in: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, Land Forces Academy „Nicolae Balcescu”, Sibiu, Romania, Volume 23, Issue 2, 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0114, p. 201.10.1515/kbo-2017-0114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2020-0086 | Journal eISSN: 2451-3113
Language: English
Page range: 255 - 261
Published on: Jul 20, 2020
Published by: Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2020 Ralitsa Voynova, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.