Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the utility of testicular-only processing fluid for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus diagnostics and the effect of sample pooling on the test results Cover

Evaluation of the utility of testicular-only processing fluid for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus diagnostics and the effect of sample pooling on the test results

Open Access
|Mar 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Receiver operating curve for interpreting the sample-to-positive-control (S/P) ELISA results in testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF). Red line – male serum S/P (reference); green line – TOPF S/P
Receiver operating curve for interpreting the sample-to-positive-control (S/P) ELISA results in testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF). Red line – male serum S/P (reference); green line – TOPF S/P

Fig. 2.

Receiver operating curve for interpreting threshold cycle (Ct) results in testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF). Red line – male serum Ct (reference); green line – TOPF Ct
Receiver operating curve for interpreting threshold cycle (Ct) results in testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF). Red line – male serum Ct (reference); green line – TOPF Ct

Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV), and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) obtained for testicular-only processing fluid using the ELISA manufacturer’s and receiver operating curve (ROC)-calculated cut-off values

ParameterELISA cut-off
Manufacturer’s (S/P ≥ 0.4)ROC-calculated (S/P ≥ 0.1)
SE (%)76.9686.47
SP (%)96.8496.31
NPV0.650.95
PPV0.980.91
κ0.650.86

Minimum, maximum and mean sample-to-positive ratio (S/P) values in the sera of female and male piglets and in testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF)

ParameterFemalesMales
Serum S/PSerum S/PTOPF S/P
Min.-0.018-0.032-0.030
Mean1.4121.2790.694
Max.3.5003.2202.610

The effect of pooling one low-, one moderately- and one highly-positive testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF) sample (classified by sample-to-positive-control ratio (S/P)) with 4, 9, 19, 39 and 79 negative TOPF samples

DilutionLow-positive samplesModerately-positive samplesHighly-positive samples
S/PaCut-offS/PCut-offS/PCut-off
Manufacturer’s S/P ≥ 0.4Calculated S/P ≥ 0.1 Manufacturer’s S/P ≥ 0.4Calculated S/P ≥ 0.1 Manufacturer’s S/P ≥ 0.4Calculated S/P ≥ 0.1
Ndil0.95 1.87 2.18
1 : 50.35010.99111.3211
1 : 100.08000.51110.9911
1 : 200.05000.22010.5411
1 : 400.04000.17010.2401
1 : 800.02000.12010.1301
Ndil0.71 1.76 2.17
1 : 50.13010.96111.1611
1 : 100.08000.48111.0111
1 : 200.04000.26010.5211
1 : 400.02000.16010.3101
1 : 800.01000.11010.2201
Ndil0.60 1.69 2.16
1 : 50.11010.81111.1111
1 : 100.07000.41110.6211
1 : 200.03000.21010.3801
1 : 400.01000.1010.2501
1 : 800.00000.08000.1601
Ndil0.53 1.56 1.95
1 : 50.14010.75111.0111
1 : 100.07000.24010.6511
1 : 200.03000.19010.1501
1 : 400.00000.12010.201
1 : 800.00000.09000.1401
Correctly classified
1 : 50/44/4 4/44/4 4/44/4
1 : 100/40/4 3/44/4 4/44/4
1 : 200/40/4 0/44/4 2/44/4
1 : 400/40/4 0/44/4 0/44/4
1 : 800/40/4 0/42/4 0/44/4
Total0/204/20 7/2018/20 10/2020/20

Minimum, maximum and mean threshold cycle (Ct) values in the serum of female and male piglets and in testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF)

ParameterFemalesMales
Serum CtSerum CtTOPF Ct
Min.19.7419.3621.27
Mean34.3934.1631.78
Max.44.5244.9344.93

Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV), and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) obtained in real-time reverse-transcription (RT)-PCR for testicular-only processing fluid using the manufacturer’s and the receiver operating curve (ROC)-calculated cut-off values

Real-time RT-PCR cut-off
ParameterManufacturer’s (Ct < 45)ROC-calculated (Ct < 43.96)
SE (%)67.5767.57
SP (%)98.91100.00
NPV0.940.92
PPV0.921.00
κ0.740.77

The effect of pooling one low-, one moderately- and one highly-positive testicular-only processing fluid (TOPF) sample with 9, 19, 39, 79, 159 and 319 negative TOPF samples

DilutionLow-positive samplesModerately-positive samplesHighly-positive samples
CtaCut-offCtCut-offCtCut-off
Manufacturer’s Ct < 45Calculated Ct < 43.96 Manufacturer’s Ct < 45Calculated Ct < 43.96 Manufacturer’s Ct < 45Calculated Ct < 43.96
Ndil38.34--34.09--21.9--
1 : 1039.161135.321126.8111
1 : 2040.881139.051127.7511
1 : 4000039.161129.0211
1 : 8000000029.92 1
1 : 16000000030.3211
1 : 32000000032.1811
Ndil43.7--34.16--22.62--
1 : 1000035.241125.0811
1 : 2000043.001125.4511
1 : 4000043.661127.0811
1 : 8000044.711027.8511
1 : 16000000028.0411
1 : 32000000029.4311
Ndil43.96--27.7--25.00--
1 : 1000029.481126.5911
1 : 2000030.951128.3811
1 : 4000033.361129.9411
1 : 8000033.661130.6311
1 : 16000043.471131.2811
1 : 32000043.781133.0511
Correctly classified
1 : 101/31/3 3/33/3 3/33/3
1 : 201/31/3 3/33/3 3/33/3
1 : 400/30/3 3/33/3 3/33/3
1 : 800/30/3 2/31/3 3/33/3
1 : 1600/30/3 1/31/3 3/33/3
1 : 3200/30/3 1/31/3 3/33/3
Total2/182/18 13/1812/18 18/1818/18
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 16
Submitted on: Dec 19, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 25, 2025
Published on: Mar 1, 2025
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2025 Hanna Turlewicz-Podbielska, Arkadiusz Dors, Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.