Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of the addition of different forms of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) on the quality of vacuum-packed minced pork Cover

Effect of the addition of different forms of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) on the quality of vacuum-packed minced pork

Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Mean thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) values as mg malondialdehyde/kg meat and pH values of minced pork without and with one of three forms of rosemary

AdditiveStorage time (ST)SEMP-value
C n = 30ROL n = 30REX n = 30REO n = 30ST0 n = 40ST7 n = 40ST14 n = 40AdditiveST
pH5.68 b5.72 a5.68 b5.70 b5.68 b5.69 b5.72 a0.003<0.001<0.001
TBARS0.49 a0.39 a0.41 a0.13 b0.360.340.320.013<0.0010.146

1a, b – superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P-value ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage

Table 2.

Mean colour parameters (lightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma (C*) and hue angle (h°)) of minced pork without and with one of three forms of rosemary

AdditiveStorage time (ST)SEMP-value
C n = 30ROL n = 30REX n = 30REO n = 30ST0 n = 40ST7 n = 40ST14 n = 40AdditiveST
L*58.55 b, c59.61 a57.74 b60.24 a59.0359.0359.040.142<0.0010.964
a*9.45 b8.31 b, c9.72 b10.66 a9.369.559.700.127<0.0010.183
b*17.56 a, b, c22.34 a21.12 b19.00 c19.9620.0120.050.215<0.0010.824
C*19.96 b, c23.84 a23.25 a21.79 b22.1022.1922.320.187<0.0010.546
61.79 b69.62 a65.29 b, c60.74 b64.7463.2263.980.419<0.0010.371

1a, b, c – superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P-value ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage

Table 3.

Mean scores for sensory properties of minced pork without and with one of three forms of rosemary, as assessed by six panellists

AdditiveStorage time (ST)SEMP-value
C n = 30ROL n = 30REX n = 30REO n = 30ST0 n = 40ST7 n = 40ST14 n = 40AdditiveST
Aroma7.02 b, c7.95 a8.15 a7.40 b7.537.657.720.069<0.0010.177
Colour7.25 b7.30 b7.75 a7.60 a7.22 b7.68 a7.72 a0.048<0.001<0.001
Taste7.30 b, c8.20 a8.45 a6.65 b7.527.687.770.087<0.0010.153

1 9 – liked extremely; 8 – liked very much; 7 – liked moderately; 6 – liked slightly; 5 – neither liked nor dislike; 4 – disliked slightly; 3 – disliked moderately; 2 – disliked very much; 1 – disliked extremely

1a, b, c – superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage

Table 4.

Microbiological quality as mean log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/g of minced pork without or with one of three forms of rosemary

AdditiveStorage time (ST)SEMP-value
C n = 30ROL n = 30REX n = 30REO n = 30ST0 n = 40ST7 n = 40ST14 n = 40AdditiveST
Enterobacteriaceae1.762.242.23NDND1.12 b3.11 a0.3390.054<0.001
Pseudomonas spp.0.982.071.74NDND0.98 b2.40 a0.2840.059<0.001
Lactic acid bacteria3.54 a3.383.412.86 b3.263.293.330.0930.0480.709
Total aerobic psychrotrophic bacteria2.202.462.522.05ND2.45 b4.62 a0.3780.971<0.001

1 a, b – superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P-value ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage; ND – not detected (below the detection limit and <1 × 101 CFU/g)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0047 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Language: English
Page range: 419 - 426
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 2, 2024
Published on: Sep 23, 2024
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Katarzyna Śmiecińska, Tomasz Daszkiewicz, Agnieszka Krajewska, Dorota Kubiak, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.