Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Summary of mink farm SARS-CoV-2 monitoring data amassed during a period of 14 months

Voivodeship2021 (February–December)2022 (January–March)TotalNumber of positive farms
No. of farmsNo. of swabsNo. of farmsNo. of swabsNo. of farmsNo. of swabs
Mazowieckie581,16028420861,5800
Podkarpackie8160575132351
Lubuskie3570019295549950
Wielkopolskie1172,340871,4722043,8121
Zachodniopomorskie541,0808420621,5003
Pomorskie19380120204001
Dolnośląskie1428000142800
Kujawsko-Pomorskie2448000244801
Lubelskie361,12022356581,4762
Łódzkie612011571351
Małopolskie714011581550
Opolskie61200061200
Podlaskie1020000102001
Świętokrzyskie612013185193050
Warmińsko-Mazurskie120001200
Śląskie81600081600
Total4098,5801853,27359411,85311
Fig. 1

Locations of inspected mink farms (marked as grey dots) and those which were SARS-CoV-2 positive (marked as red dots)

Table 2

A summary of the analysis of positive mink farms

rRT-PCR
NoDate of sample collectionVoivodeshipLocationPositive/Tested Ct value range*
Wisznice (house 1)2/2021.8–25.5
116/06/2021LubelskieWisznice (house 2)1/2028.9
222/11/2021Kujawsko-PomorskieKraczki1/2028.9
3Zieleniewo11/2030.5
430/11/2021ZachodniopomorskieZieleniewo213/2024.7–36.8
5Ołużna19/2018.9–37.3
601/12/2021WielkopolskieBiadki18/2017.6–36.4
714/12/2021PodkarpackieJanowiec20/2028.1–30.4
815/12/2021PodlaskieKościuki2/2032.1–35.3
920/12/2021PomorskieLeźno10/2019.1–26.3
1020/12/2021LubelskieKłoczew5/2028.9–30.2
1120/01/2022ŁódzkieStefanów2/2020.5–21.8

[i] Ct – threshold cycle; * – results for E gene rRT-PCR

Table 3

Results of oral swab and serum sample analysis collected in two houses in Wisznice in the Lubelskie voivodeship

CollectedPositive
16/06/202120221.8–25.510
119/07/2021Oral swab90128.81.1
02/08/2021Serum of kitten15151.25100
Serum of adult15141.6493.3
16/06/202120228.5–30.710
19/07/2021Oral swab600-0
2Serum of kitten15151.04100
02/08/2021Serum of adult15141.2593.3

[i] * – results for E gene rRT-PCR/mean OD values obtained using Ingezim ELISA test

Fig. 2

Maximum-likelihood phylogenic tree constructed using the SARS-CoV-2 sequences from all Polish mink farms obtained in this and previous studies. The tree was processed with the Nextclade open source tool (https://clades.nextstrain.org/tree)

Table 4

Molecular characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 detected in farmed mink in Poland in the studied period

NoMink farmGisaid_IDCladePango lineageNucleotideFrame shiftsAmino acid
substit.delet.substit.delet.
1Wisznice, house 2,EPI_ISL_3218555GR/20BB.1.13100180
LubelskieEPI_ISL_32185573100180
2Kraczki, Kujawsko-PomorskieEPI_ISL_7721854GK/21J (Delta)AY.4344130344
EPI_ISL_869390638130334
3Ołużna, ZachodniopomorskieEPI_ISL_8693911GK/21J (Delta)AY.4340141344
EPI_ISL_869391238130334
4ZieleniewoZachodniopomorskie 1,EPI_ISL_8693816GK/21J (Delta)AY.4338130334
EPI_ISL_869391341130344
5Biadki, WielkopolskieEPI_ISL_8693914GK/21J (Delta)AY.4341130344
EPI_ISL_869391541130344
EPI_ISL_96400285110413734
6Janowiec, PodkarpackieEPI_ISL_9640033GK/21J (Delta)AY.1265010713734
EPI_ISL_96400525010713734
7Kościuki, PodlaskieEPI_ISL_9640055GRY/20I (Alpha, V1)B.1.1.7523703011
8Leźno, PomorskieEPI_ISL_9640059GK/21J (Delta)B.1.617.247160375
EPI_ISL_9640062454713612
9Kłoczew, LubelskieEPI_ISL_9640065GK/21J (Delta)AY.12241160324
EPI_ISL_10337406745305112
10Stefanów, ŁódzkieEPI_ISL_10337127GRA/21L (Omicron)BA.2725305112
Table 5

Sequence mutations in SARS-CoV-2 detected in farmed mink in Poland in the studied period

NoMink farmPango lineageNonsynonymous mutations in the S protein in comparison to the Wuhan reference strain
1Wisznice, Lubelskie house 2,B.1.1Q183R, Y453F, K558N, D614G, C1236F
2Kraczki, Kujawsko- PomorskieAY.43T19R, E96A, G142D, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N, E156-, F157-
3Ołużna, ZachodniopomorskieAY.43T19R, G142D, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N, E156-, F157-
4Zieleniewo1, ZachodniopomorskieAY.43T19R, G142D, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N, E156-, F157-
5Biadki, WielkopolskieAY.43T19R, G142D, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N, E156-, F157-
6Janowiec, PodkarpackieAY.126T19R, T95I, G142D, R158G, G181V, L452R, T478K, N532S, D614G, P681R, I850L, D950N, K1045N E156-, F157-
7Kościuki, PodlaskieB.1.1.7S94F, Y453F, N501Y, A570D, D614G, P681H, T716I, S982A, D1118H H69-, Y144-, H245-, S247-, V70-, L244-, R246-, Y248-
8Leźno, PomorskieB.1.617.2T19R, T95I, G142D, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N, E156-, F157-
9Kłoczew, LubelskieAY.122T19R, G142D, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N E156-, F157-
10Stefanów, ŁódzkieBA.2T19I, A27S, G142D, V213G, G339D, S371F, S373P, S375F, T376A, D405N, R408S, K417N, N440K, S477N, T478K, E484A, Q493R, Q498R, N501Y, Y505H, D614G, H655Y, N679K, P681H, N764K, D796Y, Q954H, N969K L24-, P25-, P26-

[i] bold – Y453F mutation; italic and bold – D614G mutation; underlined – substitutions in position 681

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2022-0066 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Language: English
Page range: 449 - 458
Submitted on: Apr 13, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 15, 2022
Published on: Dec 3, 2022
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Katarzyna Domańska-Blicharz, Anna Orłowska, Marcin Smreczak, Bas Oude Munnink, Paweł Trębas, Wojciech Socha, Krzysztof Niemczuk, Magdalena Kawiak-Sadurska, Justyna Opolska, Anna Lisowska, Aleksandra Giza, Arkadiusz Bomba, Ewelina Iwan, Marion Koopmans, Jerzy Rola, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.