Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Molecular variation analysis based on cox1 and nad1 gene sequences
| Source of variation | Gene | Degrees of freedom | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within | cox1 | 141 | 62.933 | 0.44634 Vb | 99.70 |
| populations | nad1 | 141 | 55.711 | 0.39511 Vb | 96.48 |
| Among | cox1 | 2 | 0.990 | 0.00133 Va | 0.30 |
| populations | nad1 | 2 | 1.844 | 0.01442 Va | 3.52 |
| Total | cox1 | 143 | 63.924 | 0.44767 | |
| nad1 | 143 | 57.556 | 0.40953 | ||
| F–statistic | cox1 | 0.04451, P > 0.05 | |||
| nad1 | 0.03520, P > 0.05 | ||||
Genetic diversity parameters of the three geographic populations of F_ hepatica
| Genes | Populations | N | h | Hd | K | π |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urumqi | 45 | 18 | 0.909 ± 0.00089 | 3.160 | 0.00637 | |
| cox1 | Hami | 90 | 23 | 0.890 ± 0.00047 | 3.280 | 0.00661 |
| Kuqa | 9 | 6 | 0.833 ± 0.01600 | 2.722 | 0.00549 | |
| Total | 144 | 34 | 0.894 ± 0.00034 | 3.287 | 0.00663 | |
| Urumqi | 45 | 12 | 0.835 ± 0.00118 | 2.638 | 0.00400 | |
| nad1 | Hami | 90 | 25 | 0.7590 ± 0.00218 | 2.778 | 0.00421 |
| Kuqa | 9 | 6 | 0.889 ± 0.00828 | 2.583 | 0.00391 | |
| Total | 144 | 33 | 0.805 ± 0.00086 | 2.969 | 0.00450 |
Neutrality indices based on cox1 and nad1 genes of F_ hepatica in different geographical regions of Xinjiang
| Population | cox1 | nad1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tajima’s D | Fu’s Fs | Tajima’s D | Fu’s Fs | |
| Urumqi | –0.74410 | –7.514 | –0.72079 | –2.547 |
| Hami | –0.36276 | –8.659 | –1.94511* | –13.448 |
| Kuqa | –0.34120 | –1.395 | –0.55536 | –1.522 |
| Total | –1.01276 | –19.204 | –1.92702* | –19.881 |