Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of high and low doses of acrylamide on porcine erythropoiesis Cover

The influence of high and low doses of acrylamide on porcine erythropoiesis

Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

The average number of cells from the erythroblastic cell line in relation to 1,000 of all porcine bone marrow cells (mean ± SD) on day 0

ParameterControlLDHD
PROERBL20.6 ± 2.7220.2 ± 2.2421 ± 1.6
BASO ERBL25.8 ± 3.7627.2 ± 2.5624.6 ± 3.68
POLY ERBL75.8 ± 13.7669.2 ± 9.8478.4 ± 9.52
ORTHO ERBL202 ± 15.6196.2 ± 9.36201.2 ± 7.36
TOTAL NORMO324.2 ± 29.84312.8 ± 15.76325.2 ± 16.96
PROMEGALOBL000
BASO MEGALO000
POLY MEGALO000
TOTAL MEGALO000
NORMO/MEGAL000
PARA ERB0.6 ± 0.7200
TOTAL ERBL324.8 ± 29.76312.8 ± 15.76325.2 ± 16.96

[i] PROERBL – proerythroblast; BASO ERBL – basophilic erythroblast; POLY ERBL – polychromatic erythroblast; ORTO ERBL – orthochromatic erythroblast; TOTAL NORMO – total number of normocytes; PROMEGALOBL – promegaloblast; BASO MEGALO – basophilic megaloblasts; POLY MEGALO – polychromatic megaloblast; TOTAL MEGALO – total number of megaloblasts; NORMO/MEGALO – normoblasts/megaloblasts; PARA ERB – paraerythroblast; TOTAL ERBL – total number of cells from erythroblastic cell line

Table 2

The average number of cells from the erythroblastic cell line in relation to 1,000 of all porcine bone marrow cells (mean ± SD) on day 28

ParameterControlLDHD
PROERBL21.2b ± 1.8418.6c ± 2.4826ac ± 6.4
BASO ERBL24.4a ± 2.2718.8ac ± 3.7625.8c ± 3.84
POLY ERBL70.2ab ± 6.260.6ac ± 15.1256.6bc ± 7.92
ORTO ERBL190ab ± 11.2165ac ± 7.291.2bc ± 10.96
TOTAL NORMO305.8ab ± 14.96263ac ± 14201.8bc ± 11.84
PROMEGALOBL000
BASO MEGALO000
POLY MEGALO000
TOTAL MEGALO000
NORMO/MEGALO000
PARA ERBL000
TOTAL ERBL305.8ab ± 14.96263ac ± 14201.8bc ± 11.84

[i] Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) are marked by a – difference between the control and LD groups; b – difference between control and HD groups; c – difference between LD and HD groups. Abbreviations as in Table 1

Fig. 1

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing a Howell– Jolly body in erythrocyte in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 2

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic and normochromatic erythroblasts in the control group on day 0; 1,000×

Fig. 3

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 4

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the LD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 5

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing polychromatic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

Fig. 6

Representative cytological image of a bone marrow smear stained with the May–Grünwald–Giemsa method showing basophilic erythroblasts in the HD group on day 28; 1,000×

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0065 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Language: English
Page range: 609 - 614
Submitted on: Mar 26, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 30, 2020
Published on: Oct 15, 2020
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Anna Snarska, Katarzyna Palus, Dominika Wysocka, Liliana Rytel, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.