Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Protective role of propolis on low and high dose furan-induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in rats

Open Access
|Sep 2019

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Different origins of furan (adapted from Perez-Locas and Yaylayan (31))
Different origins of furan (adapted from Perez-Locas and Yaylayan (31))

Fig. 2

The livers of furan-treated rats. A – normal macroscopic view of the liver in the control group. B – focal congestion and pale yellow surface in the furan-L group. C – appearance of enlarged pale yellow liver with a rounded edge in the furan-H group
The livers of furan-treated rats. A – normal macroscopic view of the liver in the control group. B – focal congestion and pale yellow surface in the furan-L group. C – appearance of enlarged pale yellow liver with a rounded edge in the furan-H group

Fig. 3

A – control group: normal histological appearance of the liver. B – propolis group: normal histological appearance of the liver. C – furan-L group: slight macrovesicular lubrication in hepatocytes (arrowheads), periportal fibrosis and bile duct proliferation. D – furan-H group: severe and diffuse macrovesicular lubrication in hepatocytes (arrowheads), oval cell proliferation (*) and severe diffuse fibrosis in the liver parenchyma. E – furan-L+propolis group: cloudy swelling in pericentrally located hepatocytes (arrowheads). F – furan-H+propolis group: slight macrovesicular lubrication in hepatocytes (arrowheads) and mild periportal fibrosis. (HE, 50×)
A – control group: normal histological appearance of the liver. B – propolis group: normal histological appearance of the liver. C – furan-L group: slight macrovesicular lubrication in hepatocytes (arrowheads), periportal fibrosis and bile duct proliferation. D – furan-H group: severe and diffuse macrovesicular lubrication in hepatocytes (arrowheads), oval cell proliferation (*) and severe diffuse fibrosis in the liver parenchyma. E – furan-L+propolis group: cloudy swelling in pericentrally located hepatocytes (arrowheads). F – furan-H+propolis group: slight macrovesicular lubrication in hepatocytes (arrowheads) and mild periportal fibrosis. (HE, 50×)

The effect of propolis supplementation on liver histopathological changes

ControlPropolisFuran-LFuran-HFuran-L+ PropolisFuran-H+ Propolis
Oval cell proliferation0.0 ± 0.0d0.0 ± 0.0d1.67 ± 0.33b3.00 ± 0.0a0.0 ± 0.0d1.00 ± 0.0c
Pseudo-inclusion0.0 ± 0.0d0.0 ± 0.0d1.00 ± 0.0b2.00 ± 0.0a0.33 ± 0.21c1.00 ± 0.0b
Nuclear atypia0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b1.33 ± 0.21a1.50 ± 0.22a0.33 ± 0.21b1.00 ± 0.0a
Karyomegaly0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c1.17 ± 0.17ab1.50 ± 0.22a1.00 ± 0.0b1.00 ± 0.0b
Macrovesicular fatty0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c1.00 ± 0.37b3.00 ± 0.0a0.67 ± 0.21b1.00 ± 0.0b
Apoptotic body0.0 ± 0.0d0.0 ± 0.0d1.33 ± 0.21b2.00 ± 0.0a1.00 ± 0.0c2.00 ± 0.0a
Periportal fibrosis0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c1.33 ± 0.21b2.50 ± 0.22a1.00 ± 0.0b1.00 ± 0.0b
Pericentral fibrosis0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c0.33 ± 0.21bc0.50 ± 0.22b0.0 ± 0.0c1.00 ± 0.0a
Capsular fibrosis0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b0.17 ± 0.17b1.00 ± 0.45a0.33 ± 0.21ab1.00 ± 0.0a
Bile duct proliferation0.0 ± 0.0d0.0 ± 0.0d1.67 ± 0.21b3.00 ± 0.0a1.00 ± 0.0c1.00 ± 0.0c
Nodule (adenoma)0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b0.17 ± 0.17ab0.50 ± 0.22a0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b
Sinusoidal congestion0.0 ± 0.0d0.0 ± 0.0d1.50 ± 0.22b2.00 ± 0.0a1.33 ± 0.21bc1.00 ± 0.0c
Periportal cell infiltration0.0 ± 0.0e0.0 ± 0.0e1.50 ± 0.22c2.50 ± 0.22a1.00 ± 0.0d2.00 ± 0.0b
Single cell necrosis0.0 ± 0.0d0.0 ± 0.0d1.50 ± 0.22b2.00 ± 0.0a0.67 ± 0.21c1.00 ± 0.0c
Bile pigment accumulation0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c1.00 ± 0.37b2.00 ± 0.0a0.67 ± 0.21b1.00 ± 0.0b
Sinusoidal congestion0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c1.00 ± 0.0a1.00 ± 0.0a0.67 ± 0.21b1.00 ± 0.0a
Parenchyma degeneration0.0 ± 0.0c0.0 ± 0.0c1.50 ± 0.22b2.00 ± 0.0a1.33 ± 0.21b2.00 ± 0.0a
Intestinal metaplasia in the bile duct epithelium0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b0.50 ± 0.24a0.0 ± 0.0b0.0 ± 0.0b

The effect of propolis supplementation on liver MDA and GSH levels and CAT, GSH-Px, GST, and SOD activities

ControlPropolisFuran-LFuran-HFuran-L+ Prop.Furan-H+ Prop.
MDA (nmol/g tissue)0.62 ± 0.02c0.59 ± 0.02c0.79 ± 0.04b0.90 ± 0.05a0.67 ± 0.03c0.67 ± 0.01c
GSH (μmol/ml)23.71 ± 0.30a23.99 ± 0.21a22.48 ± 0.35b21.25 ± 0.30c23.40 ± 0.24a23.39 ± 0.29a
CAT (k/mg protein)0.260 ± 0.02a0.241 ± 0.01a0.113 ± 0.02b0.042 ± 0.01b0.234 ± 0.02a0.238 ± 0.01a
GSH-Px (U/g protein)48.34 ± 2.83a47.44 ± 2.09a25.79 ± 2.42b29.46 ± 0.82b42.27 ± 1.16a42.39 ± 2.46a
GST (U/mg protein)23.19 ± 0.84a21.05 ± 0.80ab14.96 ± 0.84c13.87 ± 1.02c21.03 ± 0.90ab19.97 ± 1.19b
SOD (U/g protein)77.49 ± 0.25a77.19 ± 0.31ab74.18 ± 0.22c73.00 ± 0.58c76.10 ± 0.27ab75.83 ± 0.81b

The effect of propolis supplementation on plasma AST, ALT, ALP, and LDH activities and cholesterol levels

ControlPropolisFuran-LFuran-HFuran-L+ Prop.Furan-H+ Prop.
AST (U/L)212.66 ± 22.09bc192.0 ± 12.49c236.00 ± 10.56bc639.00 ± 27.71a**192.66 ± 20.52c261.00 ± 16.74b
ALT (U/L)55.66 ± 2.69c52.33 ± 3.65c62.00 ± 4.70c281.0 ± 3.46a**42.33 ± 1.72c124.50 ± 4.53b
ALP (U/L)6.66 ± 0.21c5.33 ± 0.55c7.00 ± 0.80bc9.50 ± 0.28a*6.00 ± 0.36c8.50 ± 0.28ab
LDH (U/L)969.00 ± 143.21b804.50 ± 112.87b957.50 ± 32.75b1647.33 ± 245.63a**768.50 ± 101.32b1557.50 ± 115.75a
Cholesterol (mg/dL)50.66 ± 0.8447.00 ± 2.1956.75 ± 2.8957.00 ± 1.1545.66 ± 1.8747.00 ± 1.15
Language: English
Page range: 423 - 431
Submitted on: Feb 13, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 12, 2019
Published on: Sep 13, 2019
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2019 Emre Kaya, Seval Yılmaz, Songul Ceribasi, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.