Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Establishment of renal failure models by laparoscopy in bama pigs which underwent partial nephrectomy and radical contralateral nephrectomy Cover

Establishment of renal failure models by laparoscopy in bama pigs which underwent partial nephrectomy and radical contralateral nephrectomy

Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume 63 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
By: Hai-Feng Liu,  Hui Li,  Ge Bai,  Qian-Zhen Zhang,  Xiang-Gao,  Tao Liu and  Hong-Bin Wang  
Open Access
|Sep 2019

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

The clamped artery was released two seconds after suturing to confirm haemostasis. The two haemostatic clips were released completely when there was no haemorrhage
The clamped artery was released two seconds after suturing to confirm haemostasis. The two haemostatic clips were released completely when there was no haemorrhage

Fig. 2

Rectal temperature in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
Rectal temperature in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 3

Heart rate in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
Heart rate in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 4

WBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
WBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 5

RBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚) group q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point ???
RBC in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚) group q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point ???

Fig. 6

PLT in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
PLT in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 7

CRE in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
CRE in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 8

BUN in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point
BUN in 15 pigs (n = 5 for ⅔ group, n = 5 for ¾ group, n = 5 for ⅚ group) q – preoperative baseline* p < 0.05 compared with the preoperative baseline. A p < 0.05 compared with value of ⅔ group at the same time point. B p < 0.05 compared with value of ¾ group at the same time point

Fig. 9

Histological examination after ⅚ nephrectomy. The picture was captured in microscope vision.A – normal renal tissue, B – at 4 weeks after surgery, C – at 10 weeks after surgery. All at 400×
Histological examination after ⅚ nephrectomy. The picture was captured in microscope vision.A – normal renal tissue, B – at 4 weeks after surgery, C – at 10 weeks after surgery. All at 400×
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2019-0052 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 447 - 455
Submitted on: Dec 24, 2018
|
Accepted on: Aug 6, 2019
|
Published on: Sep 13, 2019
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
miniature pig,
chronic renal failure,
animal model,
laparoscopy,
nephrectomy
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Microbiology and virology,
Life sciences, other,
Medicine,
Veterinary medicine

© 2019 Hai-Feng Liu, Hui Li, Ge Bai, Qian-Zhen Zhang, Xiang-Gao, Tao Liu, Hong-Bin Wang, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 63 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)Next article