Impact of prepartum body condition score loss on metabolic status during the transition period and subsequent fertility in Brown Swiss dairy cows

Çolakoğlu, Hatice Esra; Yazlık, Murat Onur; Pekcan, Mert; Kaya, Ufuk; Kaçar, Cihan; Vural, Mehmet Rıfat; Kurt, Serdal; Yildirim, Merve Menekse; Bas, Ahmet; Küplülü, Şükrü

Impact of prepartum body condition score loss on metabolic status during the transition period and subsequent fertility in Brown Swiss dairy cows

Volume 63 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

By:

Hatice Esra Çolakoğlu, Murat Onur Yazlık, Mert Pekcan, Ufuk Kaya, Cihan Kaçar, Mehmet Rıfat Vural, Serdal Kurt, Merve Menekse Yildirim, Ahmet Bas and Şükrü Küplülü

Open Access

|Sep 2019

Figures & Tables

BCS changes (mean ± SEM) during the study period among groups

Effect of different body condition score (BCS) loss on concentration of Ca (mean ± SEM)

Effect of different body condition score (BCS) changes at peripartum period on BHBA

Effect of different body condition score (BCS) changes on rate of the corpus luteum activity, clinical endometritis, calving to conception interval (median (min–max)), and pregnancy rate

		Group
Parameter	BCS-C	BCS-L	BCS-H	P-value
Corpus luteum activity < 30 ± 4d (%)	61.90	40	50	0.187
Clinical endometritis (%)	9.50 ^b	35 ^a	37.50 ^a	0.032
Interval from calving to conception (day)	82 (47–119)	122(50–168)	106 (47–150)	0.561
Pregnancy rate (%)
1^st service	61.90	50	50	0.473
Overall	80.95^a	65 ^b	56.25 ^b	0.035

Effect of different body condition score (BCS) changes on concentrations of AST, CK, GGT, cholesterol, BID, and BIT (mean ± SEM) among groups

		Days			P-value
Parameters	−14 ± 3 Antepartum	3 Postpartum	14 Postpartum	30 ± 4 Postpartum	Group	Time	Group*Time
AST
BCS-H	76.76 ± 4.09_b	146.09 ± 18.46^a	146.26 ± 17.36^a,A	88.90 ± 5.03^b
BCS-L	82.49 ± 5.51^b	127.04 ± 12.01^a	112.70 ± 11.97^ab,C	92.21 ± 5.22^b	0.034	0.000	0.050
BCS-C	79.75 ± 3.18	107.23 ± 4.03	102.03 ± 4.98^B	85.51 ± 4.85
ALP
BCS-H	45.63 ± 3.26	34.94 ± 5.07	34.25 ± 4.74	35.69 ± 5.75
BCS-L	40.85 ± 4.87^ab	51.90 ± 6.27^a	33.75 ± 3.92^b	30 ± 3.74^b	0.624	0.000	0.052
BCS-C	45.81 ± 6.27^ab	50.48 ± 6.23^a	37.76 ± 5.87^b	40.62 ± 7.12^ab
CK
BCS-H	464.18 ± 183.58^b	1675.20 ± 621.04^a,A	536.60 ± 130.88^b	404.19 ± 139.10^b
BCS-L	452.46 ± 228.74	433.14 ± 104.29^B	376.79 ± 114.27	414.46 ± 132.60	0.010	0.047	0.048
BCS-C	458.78 ± 118.61	219.90 ± 29.43^B	286.23 ± 51.44	329.82 ± 91.09
GGT
BCS-H	15.01 ± 1.27	13.20 ± 2.45	16.10 ± 1.78	18.54 ± 1.49
BCS-L BCS-C	19.02 ± 2.85 15.75 ± 1.63	23.21 ± 3.02 18.90 ± 2.82	22.76 ± 1.95 17.50 ± 2.17	16.03 ± 1.78 14.31 ± 1.26	0.041	0.322	0.112
Cholesterol
BCS-H	93.88 ± 3.43^b	68 ± 4.14^c	79.94 ± 4.48^bc	115.19 ± 5.91^a
BCS-L	88.70 ± 2.90^b	67.25 ± 2.77^c	76.55 ± 8.45^bc	110.30 ± 7.29^a	0.164	0.000	0.940
BCS-C	92.38 ± 2.99^b	76.86 ± 3.05^c	87.48 ± 6.09^bc	117 ±6.01^a
BID
BCS-H	0.11 ± 0.02^ab	0.18 ± 0.03^a,AB	0.13 ± 0.03^ab	0.08 ± 0.02^b
BCS-L	0.10 ± 0.01^bc	0.27 ± 0.03^a,A	0.16 ± 0.02^b	0.08 ± 0.01^c	0.008	0.000	0.016
BCS-C	0.11± 0.01^a	0.14 ± 0.02^a,B	0.10 ± 0.02^ab	0.05 ± 0.01^b
BIT
BCS-H	0.09 ± 0.01^b	0.31 ± 0.06^a,AB	0.20 ± 0.05^ab,AB	0.11 ± 0.01^b
BCS-L	0.11 ± 0.01^b	0.45 ± 0.07^a,A	0.32 ± 0.05^a,A	0.15 ± 0.02^b	0.001	0.000	0.014
BCS-C	0.09 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.02^B	0.16 ± 0.03^B	0.13 ± 0.02

Constituents of diets fed during far-off (−50 to −31 days relative to expected calving), close-up (−30 days to calving), and early lactation

Component	Far-off	Close-up	Early lactation
Ingredient, % of DM
Vetch hay	11.58	-	-
Alfalfa silage	-	-	9.67
Alfalfa hay	7.89	6.97	10.29
Corn silage	52.60	43.51	44.16
Wheat straw	10.52	22.25	-
Soybean meal, 48% CP	-	-	1.61
Concentrated feed	15.78	20.94	30.31
Limestone	0.82	2.25	1.57
Salt	0.30	-	0.26
Ammonium chloride	-	1.15	-
Dicalcium phosphate	0.14	0.30	0.44
Magnesium oxide	-	0.12	0.44
Magnesium sulphate	0.16	1.35	0.25
Sodium bicarbonate	-	-	0.70
Calcium sulphate	-	-	0.10
Mineral-vitamin mix¹	0.21	0.17	0.20

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2019-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 375 - 382

Submitted on: Dec 19, 2018

Accepted on: Jul 2, 2019

Published on: Sep 13, 2019

Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 times per year

Keywords:

cow,

pregnancy,

body condition score,

metabolites

Related subjects:

Life sciences,

Molecular biology,

Microbiology and virology,

Life sciences, other,

Medicine,

Veterinary medicine

© 2019 Hatice Esra Çolakoğlu, Murat Onur Yazlık, Mert Pekcan, Ufuk Kaya, Cihan Kaçar, Mehmet Rıfat Vural, Serdal Kurt, Merve Menekse Yildirim, Ahmet Bas, Şükrü Küplülü, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous article Volume 63 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)Next article

Impact of prepartum body condition score loss on metabolic status during the transition period and subsequent fertility in Brown Swiss dairy cows

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Effect of different body condition score (BCS) changes on rate of the corpus luteum activity, clinical endometritis, calving to conception interval (median (min–max)), and pregnancy rate

Effect of different body condition score (BCS) changes on concentrations of AST, CK, GGT, cholesterol, BID, and BIT (mean ± SEM) among groups

Constituents of diets fed during far-off (−50 to −31 days relative to expected calving), close-up (−30 days to calving), and early lactation

Paradigm

My account