Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fertility Patterns and Regional Disparities in Romania: Evidence from Spatial Panel Models Cover

Fertility Patterns and Regional Disparities in Romania: Evidence from Spatial Panel Models

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Andrei, T., Mirică, A., & Petcu, I.-R. (2022). Demographic decline in Romania: An analysis using census data after the Romanian Revolution of 1989. Proceedings of the Romanian Academy, Series B, 24(2), 205–212.
  2. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
  4. Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  5. Billingsley, S., & Duntava, A. (2015). The “transition generation’s” entrance to parenthood: Postponement across 19 post-socialist countries. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography.
  6. Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer.
  7. Fent, T., Diaz, B. A., & Prskawetz, A. (2013). Family policies in the context of low fertility and social structure. Demographic Research, 29, 963–998.
  8. Ghețău, V. (2018). Un sfert de secol de declin demografic. Editura Academiei Române.
  9. Goschin, Z. (2015). Spatial dependence and regional economic growth in Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 18(2), 85–100.
  10. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
  11. Jaba, E., Viorică, D., Robu, I. B., & Balan, C. B. (2020). Spatial panel modelling of socio-economic determinants in Romania. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 54(1), 21–36.
  12. Jemna, D.-V., & David, M. (2018). Post-transitional regional fertility in Romania. Demographic Research, 38, 1733–1776.
  13. Jungho, K. (2023). Female education and its impact on fertility. IZA World of Labor, 228.
  14. Moran, P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17–23.
  15. Mureșan, C. (2008). Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context. Demographic Research, 19, 855–906.
  16. National Institute of Statistics. (2025). TEMPO Online database. http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table
  17. Preda, M., et al. (2020). Defining the concept of family through the lens of fertile-aged women in Bucharest, Romania: Between traditionalism and inclusion. Sustainability, 12(7).
  18. Rotariu, T. (2015). Demografie și sociologia populației. Polirom.
  19. Sobotka, T. (2008). The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 171–224.
  20. Vignoli, D., Bazzani, G., Guetto, C., Tocchioni, V., & Pirani, E. (2020). Uncertainty and narratives of the future: A theoretical framework for contemporary fertility. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 18, 1–32.
  21. Voicu, M., & Papuc, R. M. (2023). Fertility in Romania: The delay of the second gender revolution. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 69E, 133–149.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Published on: Jun 29, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Andreea-Denisa Trășcan, Constanța Mihăescu, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.